throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00415-JRG Document 10 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 425
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`IN RE: TAASERA LICENSING LLC,
`PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL
`CASES
`
`
`





`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-MD-03042-JRG
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`The Court issues this Order sua sponte. On October 17, 2022, the Court ordered that the
`
`deadline for each Defendant
`
`to file
`
`its responsive pleading under Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 12 would be due within 14 days thereof. Pursuant to Rule 12(a)(4)(A) and (i), the
`
`Court DEFERS a decision on any motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`12(b)(1)–(7) until the time of trial. This deferral applies to such motions filed before or subsequent
`
`to the entry of this Order. For purposes of clarity but not limitation, such deferral includes but is
`
`not limited to the following motions:
`
`• Trend Micro Incorporated’s (“Trend Micro”) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
`
`P. 12(b)(6) (Case No. 2:21-cv-441, Dkt. No. 21);
`
`• Trend Micro’s Motion to Dismiss Taasera Licensing LLC’s (“Taasera”) Amended
`
`Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Case No. 2:21-cv-441, Dkt. No. 39);
`
`• Defendant Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.’s (“Check Point”) Motion for Partial
`
`Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Case No. 2:22-cv-63, Dkt. No. 13);
`
`• Check Point’s Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Case
`
`No. 2:22-cv-63, Dkt. No. 26);
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00415-JRG Document 10 Filed 11/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 426
`
`• Taasera’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Declaratory Judgment for Lack of Subject
`
`Matter Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, to Transfer or Stay Under the First-to-File Rule,
`
`and to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Case No. 2:22-cv-303, Dkt. No. 14);
`
`• Taasera’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, to
`
`Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Case No. 2:22-md-3042, Dkt. No. 11; Case No. 2:22-
`
`cv-314, Dkt. No. 87); and
`
`• Quest Patent Research Corporation’s (“Quest”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject
`
`Matter Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Case No.
`
`2:22-md-3042, Dkt. No. 14; Case No. 2:22-cv-314, Dkt. No. 89).
`
` With regard to subsequent cases that may become a part of this multidistrict litigation
`
`proceeding (known as tag-along cases), the Court intends to impose the same deferral as to
`
`motions brought therein under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)–(7), and any movant
`
`in any such tag-along case should expect similar treatment from the Court.
`
`
`
`2
`
`So Ordered this
`Nov 1, 2022
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket