Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 1 of 326 PageID #:
`6502
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 2 of 326 PageID #:
`6503
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`§
`
`§
`Case No. 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP
`§
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
`(LETTER OF REQUEST) BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`Defendants.
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 3 of 326 PageID #:
`6504
`
`TO THE NATIONAL COURT ADMINISTRATION:
`
`The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas presents its compliments
`
`to the National Court Administration and requests international judicial assistance for the
`
`production of documents and source code from Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. as set forth in Schedule
`
`A attached.
`
`This request is made pursuant to the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking
`
`of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, as adopted and implemented at 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1781 and the Evidence (Proceeding in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1975 c. 34. This Court, the United
`
`States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, is a competent court of
`
`law and equity which properly has jurisdiction over this proceeding and has the power to compel
`
`the attendance of witnesses and production of documents both within and outside its jurisdiction.
`
`The documents and information requested in Schedule A exist and Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. has or
`
`will likely have them in its possession, custody, or control.
`
`The documents requested from Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. are intended for use at trial and
`
`will be highly relevant to numerous claims and defenses in the case. Specifically, the documents
`
`sought herein will be relevant to Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s (“AGIS” or
`
`“Plaintiff”) claims of patent infringement (including its alleged damages) against Defendants
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”
`
`or “Defendants”). This Court understands that the approach of the Korean courts may be more
`
`restrictive than that of this Court regarding requests for evidence from a third party, and on this
`
`basis is of the view that the information sought in this Letter of Request goes to the heart of
`
`significant issues of fact and law that will influence the final determination (at trial and/or by
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 4 of 326 PageID #:
`6505
`
`motion) of the existence, non-existence, and/or extent of any liability under Title 35 of the United
`
`States Code (“U.S. Patent Laws”), and other laws.
`
`This request is made with the understanding that it will in no way require any person to
`
`commit any offense, or to undergo a broader form of inquiry that he or she would if the litigation
`
`were conducted in Korea. In the proper exercise of its authority, this Court has determined that the
`
`documents described in Schedule A cannot be secured except by the intervention of the National
`
`Court Administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 5 of 326 PageID #:
`6506
`
`Letter of Request
`
`The following Letter of Request follows the model form presented by the Model Request
`
`for International Judicial Assistance pursuant to the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the
`
`Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters.
`
`1.
`
`Sender
`
`The Honorable J. Rodney Gilstrap
`United States District Judge
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`Sam B. Hall, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse
`100 East Houston Street
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`USA
`
`2.
`
`Central Authority of the Request State
`
`National Court Administration
`Attn.: Director of International Affairs
`Seocho-daero 219
`Seocho-gu
`Seoul 06590
`REPUBLIC OF KOREA
`
`3.
`
`Person to Whom the Executed Request is to be Returned
`
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`Fabricant LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: +1 (212) 257-5797
`Fax: +1 (212) 257-5796
`
`4.
`
`Specification of the date by which the requesting authority requires receipt
`of the response to the Letter of Request
`
`As soon as reasonably practicable consistent with the National Court Administration’s
`calendar.
`
`5.
`
`In Conformity with Article 3 of the Convention, the Undersigned Applicant
`has the Honor to Submit the Following Request:
`
`a.
`
`Requesting judicial authority (Article 3, a)
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 6 of 326 PageID #:
`6507
`
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`Marshall Division
`Sam B. Hall, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse
`100 East Houston Street
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`USA
`
`To the competent authority of (Article 3, a)
`
`Seoul, Republic of Korea
`
`Name of the case and any identifying number
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`AGIS Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et
`al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00263-JRG (E.D. Tex.)
`
`Names and addresses of the parties and their representatives (including
`representatives in the requested State) (Article 3, b)
`
`6.
`
`a.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`AGIS Software Development, LLC, a Texas corporation
`100 W. Houston Street
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`USA
`
`Representatives
`
`FABRICANT LLP
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: +1 (212) 257-5797
`Fax: +1 (212) 257-5796
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`Samuel F. Baxter
`104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Telephone: +1 (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: +1 (903) 923-9099
`sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Defendants
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`129 Samsung-Ro
`
`5
`
`
`b.
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 7 of 326 PageID #:
`6508
`
`Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon-Si
`Gyeonggi-Do, 443-742
`Republic of Korea
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`85 Challenger Road
`Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660
`
`Representatives
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P
`Neil P. Sirota
`Margaret M. Welsh
`30 Rockefeller Plaza
`New York, NY 10112
`Telephone: + 1 (212) 408-2500
`Facsimile: +1 (212) 408-2501
`neil.sirota@bakerbotts.com
`Margaret.welsh@bakerbotts.com
`
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Mark Liang
`Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: + 1 (415) 984-8700
`Facsimile: +1 (415) 984-8701
`mliang@omm.com
`
`c.
`
`Other Parties
`
`
`
`
`
`None.
`
`a. Nature of the proceedings (divorce, paternity, breach of contract, product
`liability, etc.) (Article 3, c)
`
`7.
`
`Civil lawsuit alleging direct and indirect infringement of U.S. patents.
`
`Summary of complaint
`
`b.
`
`On June 16, 2023, Plaintiff AGIS Software Development, LLC (“AGIS” or “Plaintiff”)
`
`amended their complaint originally filed on July 14, 2022 against Defendants Samsung Electronics
`
`Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc. (collectively, “Samsung” or “Defendants'”) in the
`
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging direct and indirect
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 8 of 326 PageID #:
`6509
`
`infringements of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970; 9,467,838; 9,749,829; and 9,820,123, through the
`
`manufacture, import, and/or sale of Samsung Tactical, TAK, ATAK, and CivTAK applications,
`
`products, and solutions, including related servers and services supporting Samsung Tactical, TAK,
`
`ATAK, and CivTAK, and electronic devices which are configured and/or adapted with certain
`
`map-based communication applications, products, and solutions, including but not limited to,
`
`Galaxy S23 Tactical Edition, Galaxy XCover6 Pro Tactical Edition, Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition,
`
`Galaxy S9 Tactical Edition, Galaxy S20, Galaxy S20+ 5G, Galaxy S20 FE, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G,
`
`Galaxy S21, Galaxy S21+ 5G, Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G, Galaxy S21 FE 5G, Galaxy S22, Galaxy
`
`S22+, Galaxy S22 Ultra, Galaxy S23, Galaxy S23+, and Galaxy S23 Ultra.
`
`c.
`
`Summary of defenses and counterclaims
`
`Defendants argue that they “does not infringe and has not infringed (not directly,
`
`contributorily, or by inducement), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and is not
`
`liable for infringement of any valid and enforceable claim of the Patents-in-Suit” and “[t]he claims
`
`of the Patents-in-Suit are invalid and unenforceable under 35 U.S.C. § 101,” 102, 103, 112, 116 ,
`
`and obviousness-type double patenting. See Defendants’ Answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended
`
`Complaint (attached hereto as Exhibit 3) at 12-13. Defendants also argue that Plaintiff’s claim for
`
`infringement is barred by the following affirmative defenses: substantial non-infringing uses,
`
`failure to state a claim, patent unenforceability due to unclean hands or inequitable conduct, patent
`
`misuse, lack of standing, equitable doctrines, prosecution history estoppel, ensnarement, 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1498, and unclean hands. Id. at 13-39. Defendants further contend that Plaintiff’s claim for relief
`
`is limited in whole or in part by its failure to comply with 35 U.S.C. §§ 286, 287, or 288. Id. at 13.
`
`Lastly, Defendants argue that Plaintiffs claim for equitable relief is barred (id. at 32), license or
`
`exhaustion (id. at 33), not an exceptional case (id.), and Plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief
`
`(id.).
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 9 of 326 PageID #:
`6510
`
`d.
`
`Other necessary information or documents
`
`In the course of litigation, Defendants stated that it did not possess the relevant information
`
`and it is in the possession, custody, or control of third-party Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. AGIS attaches
`
`a copy of the operative complaint, which is the Second Amended Complaint, filed by AGIS agains
`
`Defendants, as Exhibit 1, and a copy of the Protective Order governing this action, as Exhibit 2.
`
`8.
`
`a. Evidence to be obtained or other judicial act to be performed (Article 3, d)
`
`Documents in the possession, custody, or control of Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. for use in the
`
`trial of the action of AGIS Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.,
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-00263-JRG (E.D. Tex.).
`
`b.
`
`Purpose of the evidence or judicial act sought
`
`Defendants have identified Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. as a third-party with relevant
`
`information, including source code for the Samsung Knox Manage application. Accordingly,
`
`AGIS seeks documentary and source code evidence from Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. concerning the
`
`Samsung Knox Manage application. This information is relevant to the merits of AGIS’s claims.
`
`Specifically, AGIS has brought claims of direct and indirect patent infringement against
`
`Defendants. The documents and information sought herein will be highly relevant to the
`
`determination of whether AGIS’s patents have been infringed. In sum, the information sought in
`
`this Letter of Request goes to the heart of significant issues of fact and law that will, in large
`
`measure, determine the existence, non-existence, and/or extent of Defendants’ liability under the
`
`U.S. Patent Laws.
`
`9.
`
`Identity and address of any person to be examined (Article 3, e)
`
`None.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 10 of 326 PageID #:
`6511
`
`10. Questions to be put to the persons to be examined or statement of the
`subject-matter about which they are to be examined (Article 3, f)
`
`None.
`
`11.
`
`Documents or other property to be inspected
`
`See Schedule A, attached.
`
`12.
`
`Any requirement that the evidence be given on oath or affirmation and any
`special form to be used (Article 3, h)
`
`None.
`
`13.
`
`Special methods or procedure to be followed (e.g., oral or in writing,
`verbatim, transcript or summary, cross-examination, etc.) (Article 3, i, and 9)
`
`The particular documents requested in Schedule A exist and are, or are likely to be, in the
`
`possession, custody, or control of Samsung SDS Co., Ltd., are relevant to the claims and defenses
`
`of the proceedings before this Court and may not be obtained except from Samsung SDS Co., Ltd.
`
`directly. Therefore, it will further the interests of justice if:
`
`(1)
`
`You order Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. to produce documents electronically, in
`
`accordance with Schedule A attached to this Letter of Request.
`
`(2)
`
`You order that the documentary evidence produced pursuant to your enforcement
`
`of this Letter of Request shall not be used by anyone in any manner or proceeding other than in
`
`this matter, AGIS Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., Case No.
`
`2:22-cv-00263-JRG (E.D. Tex.), pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
`
`of Texas.
`
`14.
`
`Request for notification of the time and place for the execution of the
`Request and identify and address of any person to be notified (Article 7)
`
`Please notify the following counsel regarding the time and place for the execution of the
`
`Request:
`
`FABRICANT LLP
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 11 of 326 PageID #:
`6512
`
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: +1 (212) 257-5797
`Fax: +1 (212) 257-5796
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`Samuel F. Baxter
`104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Telephone: +1 (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: +1 (903) 923-9099
`sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P
`Neil P. Sirota
`Margaret M. Welsh
`30 Rockefeller Plaza
`New York, NY 10112
`Telephone: + 1 (212) 408-2500
`Facsimile: +1 (212) 408-2501
`neil.sirota@bakerbotts.com
`Margaret.welsh@bakerbotts.com
`
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Mark Liang
`Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: + 1 (415) 984-8700
`Facsimile: +1 (415) 984-8701
`mliang@omm.com
`
`Request for attendance or participation of judicial personnel of the
`requesting authority at the execution of the Letter of Request (Article 8)
`
`15.
`
`No attendance of judicial personnel is requested.
`
`16.
`
`Specification of privilege or duty to refuse to give evidence under the law of
`the State of origin (Article 11, b)
`
`All claims of privilege or duty to refuse to give evidence shall be governed by Section 3 of
`
`the Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1975.
`
`
`
`17.
`
`Fees and Costs
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 12 of 326 PageID #:
`6513
`
`The fees and costs incurred which are reimbursable under the second paragraph of Article
`
`14 or under Article 26 of the Convention will be borne by AGIS, through its counsel of record:
`
`Enrique W. Iturralde, FABRICANT LLP, 411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South, Rye,
`
`New York, 10580. AGIS’s payment of such fees and costs (if any) is without prejudice to it making
`
`a subsequent request to be reimbursed for these costs by other parties in this proceeding.
`
`Conclusion
`
`In the spirit of comity and reciprocity, this Court hereby requests international judicial
`
`assistance in the form of this Letter of Request to obtain the production of documents from
`
`Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. as set forth in Schedule A. This Court expresses its sincere willingness to
`
`provide similar assistance to the National Court Administration if future circumstances should
`
`require.
`
`Dated: July __, 2023
`
`
`J. RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 13 of 326 PageID #:
`6514
`
`
`
`
`
`SCHEDULE A
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 14 of 326 PageID #:
`6515
`
`
`
`SCHEDULE A: REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS
`
`The following definitions shall apply to the following subjects:
`
`“This Action” means AGIS Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics
`
`1.
`
`Co., Ltd., et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-00263-JRG (E.D. Tex.).
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`“AGIS” and “Plaintiff” means Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC.
`
`“Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,” “Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,” “Samsung
`
`Electronics,” “Samsung,” and “Defendant(s)” means Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc. and shall include, individually or collectively, any and all individuals or
`
`entities acting on behalf of or in furtherance of Defendants and any and all of Defendants’
`
`predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and all past or
`
`present officers, directors, trustees, employees, agents, consultants, attorneys, patent agents,
`
`entities acting in joint venture, licensing or partnership relationship with the Defendants in any
`
`country.
`
`4.
`
`“Samsung SDS Co., Ltd.,” “You,” and “Your” means Samsung SDS Co., Ltd., its
`
`predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and its officers,
`
`directors, members, principals, employees, agents, representatives, affiliates, or others acting on
`
`Samsung SDS Co., Ltd.’s behalf.
`
`5.
`
`“’970 Patent” means U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970, entitled “Method of Utilizing
`
`Forced Alerts for Interactive Remote Communications.”
`
`6.
`
`“’838 Patent” means U.S. Patent No. 9,467,838, entitled “Method to Provide Ad
`
`Hoc and Password Protected Digital and Voice Networks.”
`
`7.
`
`“’829 Patent” means U.S. Patent No. 9,749,829, entitled “Method to Provide Ad
`
`Hoc and Password Protected Digital and Voice Networks.”
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 15 of 326 PageID #:
`6516
`
`
`
`8.
`
`“’123 Patent” means U.S. Patent No. 9,820,123, entitled “Method to Provide Ad
`
`Hoc and Password Protected Digital and Voice Networks.”
`
`9.
`
`“Asserted Patents” means the ’970 Patent, ’838 Patent, ’829 Patent, and ’123 Patent
`
`at issue in this Action.
`
`10.
`
`“Accused Products” include any and all of Defendants’ products (including
`
`applications, services, devices, and servers) that implement the Accused Functionalities, including
`
`any such products that were released six years preceding the Complaint in this case and any such
`
`products that will be released on or before the date of trial in this Action. “Accused Products”
`
`includes any and all products identified in the Complaint, initial disclosures, infringement
`
`contentions, and any amendments and supplements thereto. “Accused Products” includes any and
`
`all products identified by Defendant in response to discovery requests, including these
`
`Interrogatories. For example, “Accused Products” includes Samsung Tactical and Samsung Knox
`
`services. For example, “Accused Products” includes but is not limited to each and every version
`
`of Samsung devices and servers running: Samsung Tactical, TAK, ATAK, and CivTAK,
`
`WinTAK, Samsung Knox, and Find My Device. For example, “Accused Products” includes but
`
`is not limited to the following devices running Samsung Tactical, TAK, ATAK, and CivTAK,
`
`WinTAK, Samsung Knox, and Find My Device: the Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition, Galaxy S9
`
`Tactical Edition, Galaxy XCover FieldPro, Galaxy XCover Pro, Galaxy XCover6 Pro, GT-I7500
`
`Galaxy, i5700 Galaxy Spica, Galaxy S, Galaxy SL, Galaxy S II, Galaxy S Advance, Galaxy S III,
`
`Galaxy S Duos, Galaxy S III Mini, Galaxy S II Plus, Galaxy S4, Galaxy S4 Active, Galaxy S4
`
`Mini, Galaxy S4 Zoom, Galaxy S Duos 2, Galaxy S III Slim, Galaxy S5, Galaxy S III Neo, Galaxy
`
`S5 Active, Galaxy S5 Mini, Galaxy S Duos 3, Galaxy S5 Plus, Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge, Galaxy
`
`S5 Neo, Galaxy S6 Active, Galaxy S6 Edge+, Galaxy S7, Galaxy S7 Edge, Galaxy S7 Active,
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 16 of 326 PageID #:
`6517
`
`
`
`Galaxy S8, Galaxy S8+, Galaxy S8 Active, Galaxy S9, Galaxy S9+, Galaxy S10e, Galaxy S10,
`
`Galaxy S10+, Galaxy S10 5G, Galaxy S21, Galaxy S20 FE, Galaxy S20 FE 5G, Galaxy S20 Ultra,
`
`Galaxy S20+, Galaxy S20+ 5G, Galaxy S21, Galaxy S21 5G, Galaxy S21 FE 5G, Galaxy S21
`
`Ultra, Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G, Galaxy S21+, Galaxy S21+ 5G, Galaxy S22, Galaxy S22 Ultra,
`
`Galaxy S22+, Galaxy S23, Galaxy S23+, Galaxy S23 Ultra, Galaxy Alpha, Galaxy A3, Galaxy
`
`A5, Galaxy A7, Galaxy A8, Galaxy A3, Galaxy A5, Galaxy A7, Galaxy A8, Galaxy A8+, Galaxy
`
`A6, Galaxy A6+, Galaxy A8 Star, Galaxy A7, Galaxy A9, Galaxy A6s, Galaxy A8s, Galaxy A30,
`
`Galaxy A50, Galaxy A10, Galaxy A20, Galaxy A40, Galaxy A70, Galaxy A20e, Galaxy A80,
`
`Galaxy A40s, Galaxy A60, Galaxy A10s, Galaxy A20s, Galaxy A10e, Galaxy C5, Galaxy C7,
`
`Galaxy C9, Galaxy C9 Pro, Galaxy C7 Pro, Galaxy C5, Pro, Galaxy C8, Galaxy J, Galaxy J1,
`
`Galaxy J5, Galaxy J7, Galaxy J2, Galaxy J1 Ace, Galaxy J1 Nxt, Galaxy J1 Mini, Galaxy J5
`
`(2016), Galaxy J3 Pro, Galaxy J7, Galaxy J Max, Galaxy J1 Ace Neo, Galaxy J1 (2016), Galaxy
`
`J5 Prime, Galaxy J7, Prime, Galaxy J1 Mini Prime, Galaxy J2 Prime, Galaxy J3 Emerge, Galaxy
`
`J7 V, Galaxy J3 Prime, Galaxy J7 Pro, Galaxy J7 Max, Galaxy J7 Nxt, Galaxy J3 Luna Pro, Galaxy
`
`J7 Sky Pro, Galaxy J7+, Galaxy J2 Pro, Galaxy J7 Prime 2, Galaxy J7 Duo, Galaxy J4, Galaxy J6,
`
`Galaxy J3 (2018), Galaxy J7 (2018), Galaxy J2 Core, Galaxy J4+, Galaxy J6+, Galaxy J4 Core,
`
`Galaxy M, Galaxy M10, Galaxy M20, Galaxy M30, Galaxy M40, Galaxy E5, Galaxy E7, Galaxy
`
`Grand, Galaxy Core, Galaxy Core Plus, Galaxy Grand 2, Galaxy Grand Neo, Galaxy Core Prime,
`
`Galaxy Grand Prime Plus, Galaxy Grand Prime Pro, Galaxy Mega 5.8, Galaxy Mega 6.3, Galaxy
`
`Mega 2, Galaxy Mini, Galaxy Mini 2, Galaxy Trend, Galaxy Trend Lite, Galaxy Trend Plus,
`
`Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Ace Plus, Galaxy Ace 2, Galaxy Ace 3, Galaxy Ace Style, Galaxy Ace 4,
`
`Galaxy On7, Galaxy On5, Galaxy On5 Pro, Galaxy On7 Pro, Galaxy On8, Galaxy On Nxt, Galaxy
`
`On Max, Galaxy On7 Prime, Galaxy On6, Galaxy On8 (2018), Galaxy R, Galaxy R Style, Galaxy
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 17 of 326 PageID #:
`6518
`
`
`
`Y, Galaxy Y Duos, Galaxy Young, Galaxy Young 2, Galaxy Pocket, Galaxy Pocket Plus, Galaxy
`
`Pocket Neo, Galaxy Pocket Duos, Galaxy Pocket 2, Galaxy U, Galaxy Neo, Galaxy Pro, Galaxy
`
`Precedent, Galaxy Z, Galaxy Rush, Galaxy 5, Galaxy W, Galaxy Fit, Galaxy Gio, Galaxy Prevail,
`
`Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Discover, Galaxy Reverb, Galaxy Stellar, Galaxy Appeal, Galaxy Express,
`
`Galaxy Express 2, Galaxy Fame, Galaxy Star, Galaxy Win, Galaxy Win Pro, Galaxy Star Pro,
`
`Galaxy Fame Lite, Galaxy Round, Galaxy Light, Galaxy V, Galaxy V Plus, Galaxy V2, Galaxy K
`
`Zoom, Galaxy Folder, Galaxy Active Neo, Galaxy Folder 2, Galaxy Fold, Galaxy Note, Galaxy
`
`Note II, Galaxy Note 3, Galaxy Note 4, Galaxy Note Edge, Galaxy Note 5, Galaxy Note 7, Galaxy
`
`Note Fan Edition, Galaxy Note 8, Galaxy Note 9, Galaxy Note 10, Galaxy Note 10+, Galaxy Note
`
`10+ 5G, Galaxy Tab, Galaxy Tab 7.0, Galaxy Tab 10.1, Galaxy Tab 10.1N, Galaxy Tab 10.1v,
`
`Galaxy Tab 8.9, Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus, Galaxy Tab 7.7, Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, Galaxy Tab 2 10.1,
`
`Galaxy Tab 3 7.0, Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0, Galaxy Tab 3 8.0, Galaxy Tab 3 10.1, Galaxy Tab 4 7.0,
`
`Galaxy Tab 4 8.0, Galaxy Tab 4 10.1, Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4, Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, Galaxy Tab Pro
`
`12.2, Galaxy Tab S 8.4, Galaxy Tab S 10.5, Galaxy Tab S2 8.0, Galaxy Tab S2 9.7, Galaxy Tab
`
`S3 9.7, Galaxy Tab S4 10.5, Galaxy Tab E 8, Galaxy Tab E 9.6, Galaxy Tab A 8.0, Galaxy Tab A
`
`9.7, Galaxy Tab A 6.0, Galaxy Tab A 7.0, Galaxy Tab A 10.1, Galaxy Tab A 10.5, Galaxy Tab
`
`Pro S 12.0, Galaxy Book 10.6, Galaxy Book 12.0, Galaxy Tab Active, Galaxy Tab Active 2,
`
`Galaxy View, Galaxy Note 8.0, Galaxy Note 10, Galaxy Note 10.1, Galaxy Note Pro 12.2, Galaxy
`
`Gear, Gear Sport, Gear S3 Frontier, Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Watch Active, and Galaxy Watch
`
`Active 2 from July 2016 to the present.
`
`11.
`
`“Document Requests” means all requests for the production of documents made by
`
`Rampart to You regarding this Action, via subpoena or otherwise.
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 18 of 326 PageID #:
`6519
`
`
`
`12.
`
`“Document(s)” shall have the broadest meaning ascribed to it by Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 34 and Federal Rule of Evidence 1001, and shall include within its meaning any
`
`and all papers, videotapes or video recordings, photographs, films, recordings, memoranda, books,
`
`records, accounts, letters, correspondence, notes of meetings, notes of conversations, notes of
`
`telephone calls, inter-office memoranda or written communications of any nature, including email
`
`and chat logs, recordings of conversations either in writing or by means of any mechanical or
`
`electrical recording device, notes, papers, reports, analyses, invoices, canceled checks or check
`
`stubs, receipts, minutes of meetings, time sheets, diaries, desk calendars, ledgers, schedules,
`
`licenses, financial statements, bills, logs and any differing versions of the foregoing whether
`
`denominated formal, informal or otherwise, as well as copies of the foregoing which differ in any
`
`way, including handwritten notations or other written or printed matter of any nature, from the
`
`original. The foregoing specifically includes all forms of “electronically stored information,” as
`
`that term is used in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, including electronic mail, except to the
`
`extent that an Order Regarding E-Discovery in Patent Cases is entered in This Action and requires
`
`that e-mail production requests be propounded separately from requests seeking electronically
`
`stored information. Moreover, the term “Document” shall also include all “technical documents,”
`
`such as source code, specifications, schematics, flow charts, artwork, drawings, pictures, pictorial
`
`representations, formulas, troubleshooting guides, service bulletins, technical bulletins, production
`
`specification sheets, white papers, operator manuals, operation manuals and instruction manuals.
`
`13.
`
`“Communication(s)” means, including its usual and customary meaning, any
`
`transmission, conveyance, or exchange of a word, statement, fact, thing, idea, document,
`
`instruction, information, demand, or question by any medium, whether by written, oral or other
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 19 of 326 PageID #:
`6520
`
`
`
`means including, but not limited to, electronic communications, electronic mail, electronic
`
`messages, and text messages.
`
`14.
`
`“Thing(s)” refers to any physical specimen or tangible item, including research and
`
`development models, samples, prototypes, and the like.
`
`15.
`
`“Person(s)” refers to all natural persons and all types and kinds of business or other
`
`entities including, but not limited to, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, joint
`
`ventures, associations, sole proprietorships, government bodies and government agencies. Any
`
`reference to an individual person, either singularly or as part of a defined group, includes that
`
`person’s employees, agents, legal and non-legal representatives, heirs, successors, assigns and any
`
`other person or entity acting on the behalf of such individual person. Any reference to a corporation
`
`or any other entity also refers to and includes any and all parents, subsidiaries, predecessors,
`
`successors, affiliates, partners, joint venturers, agents, employees, representatives, accountants,
`
`investment bankers, consultants or attorneys acting on behalf of the corporation or other entity.
`
`The masculine includes the feminine and vice versa; the singular includes the plural and vice versa.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`“Patent Laws” refers to Title 35 of the United States Code.
`
`“Infringe” or any variation thereof, including “infringing,” “infringement,” and
`
`“infringer,” refers to the commission of any act constituting infringement under the Patent Laws
`
`including, but not limited to, 35 U.S.C. § 271, and “infringement” means direct infringement,
`
`contributory infringement, infringement by inducement, literal infringement, and infringement by
`
`the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`18.
`
`“Entity” or “Entities” means, including without limitation, corporation, company,
`
`firm, partnership, joint venture, association, governmental body or agency, or persons other than
`
`a natural person.
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 20 of 326 PageID #:
`6521
`
`
`
`19.
`
`“Prior Art” means the subject matter described in 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103
`
`including, but not limited to, publications, patents, physical devices, prototypes, uses, sales, and
`
`offers for sale, and any documents or other items evidencing any of the foregoing.
`
`20.
`
`“Identify” means to state the following: (1) when referring to a person, the person’s
`
`full name, present or last known address, and the last known title and place of employment; (2)
`
`when referring to a business, legal, or governmental entity or association, the name of the entity
`
`or association, and the address of its main office; (3) when referring to a fact, the fact and the
`
`identity of the documentary or testimonial support for that fact; (4) when referring to a product or
`
`thing, the title or model name/number, any code name, project name or other name by which it has
`
`been referred, and a general description of the product or thing; (5) when referring to a written
`
`communication, the identity of the document(s) in which the communication was made; (6) when
`
`referring to an oral communication, the identity of all persons participating in the communication;
`
`(7) when referring to non-patent documents, the Bates number, type of document, its general nature
`
`and subject matter, date of creation, and all author(s), addressee(s), and recipient(s); and (8) when
`
`referring to patent documents, the country, patent and/or application number, dates of filing,
`
`publication and grant, and the names of the patentees or applicants.
`
`21.
`
`“Describe” means, in addition to its usual and customary meaning, to identify all
`
`Persons with knowledge of the information sought in the Document Request and to identify all
`
`documents referring, regarding, or relating to the information sought in the Document Request.
`
`22.
`
`The terms “Request,” “Document Request,” and “Request for Production,” whether
`
`singular or plural, are one and the same and no term is to be treated with distinction relative to the
`
`others.
`
`19
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 21 of 326 PageID #:
`6522
`
`
`
`23.
`
`The terms “relate to,” “reflecting,” “relating to,” or “concerning” or any variations
`
`thereof, mean relating to, referring to, concerning, mentioning, reflecting, regarding, pertaining to,
`
`evidencing, involving, describing, discussing, commenting on, embodying, responding to,
`
`supporting, contradicting, or constituting (in whole or in part), or are between (as in the context of
`
`communications), as the context makes appropriate.
`
`24.
`
`“And” and “or” shall be construed either disjunctively or conjunctively as necessary
`
`to bring within the scope of each Document Request all responses that might otherwise be
`
`construed outside the scope.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`“Any” shall include “all” and “All” shall include “any.”
`
`The term “including” means including without limitation.
`
`The use of the singular form of any word includes the plural and vice versa.
`
`“Day” or “date” means the exact day, month, and year, if ascertainable, or if not,
`
`the best available approximation (including a relationship to other events).
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`The use of any tense of any word includes all other tenses.
`
`Definitions or usages of words or phrases in these Document Requests are not
`
`intended to be, and shall not be, construed as admissions as to the meaning of words or phrases at
`
`issue in the action, and shall have no binding effect on Plaintiff in this or in any other
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 92-1 Filed 07/27/23 Page 22 of 326 PageID #:
`6523
`
`
`
`REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`
`It is requested that the National Court Administration compel the production of the
`
`following documents:
`
`1.
`
`Source code for the Samsung Accused Products, including but not limited to
`
`Samsung Knox Manage.
`
`2.
`
`Documents, including source code, for the Accused Products sufficient to show any
`
`differences between versions of software for Samsung Knox Manage.
`
`3.
`
`Documents sufficient to show Your relationship with Defendant(s) concerning the
`
`Acc