throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 90-1 Filed 07/25/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 6371
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-263-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MARK LIANG IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC’S OPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 90-1 Filed 07/25/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 6372
`
`
`
`I, Mark Liang, declare and state as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a Partner at O’Melveny & Myers LLP, counsel for Defendants Samsung
`
`Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung Electronics”) in the
`
`above captioned matter.
`
`2.
`
`I submit this declaration in support of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc.’s Response to Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Opposed
`
`Motion for Leave to Amend P.R. 4-3 Disclosures, filed concurrently herewith. I have personal
`
`knowledge of the statements set forth in this declaration and, if called as a witness, would testify
`
`competently.
`
`3.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of AGIS’s December 1,
`
`2023 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions in this case, AGIS Software
`
`Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No.
`
`2:22-CV-00263-JRG-RSP, with cited sections highlighted.
`
`4.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the June 16, 2023
`
`Declaration of Michael C. Brogioli, Ph.D. Regarding Claim Construction for this case, AGIS
`
`Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc., No. 2:22-CV-00263-JRG-RSP.
`
`5.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the June 16, 2023
`
`Declaration of Tim A. Williams, Ph.D. Regarding Claim Construction for this case, AGIS
`
`Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc., No. 2:22-CV-00263-JRG-RSP.
`
`6.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of Order No. 26 in ITC
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1347, issued on June 20, 2023, providing an initial determination granting
`
`AGIS’s motion to withdraw its November 2022 ITC complaint against Google, Samsung, TCL,
`
`Lenovo, Motorola, HMD, Sony, ASUS, BLU, and Panasonic, with cited sections highlighted.
`
`7.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of an email chain between
`
`Samsung’s counsel and AGIS’s counsel where AGIS notified Samsung of its intention to file a
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 90-1 Filed 07/25/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 6373
`
`
`
`motion for leave to amend its infringement contentions to add allegations relating to FMD.
`
`8.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of an email chain between
`
`Samsung’s counsel and AGIS’s counsel where AGIS notified Samsung of its issue with the
`
`agreed-to construction of “group” and its intention to seek leave to construe the “participants”
`
`term in that agreed to construction.
`
`9.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from AGIS’s
`
`Exhibit D1 to its June 23, 2023 Proposed Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`
`Infringement Contentions in this case, AGIS Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics
`
`Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 2:22-CV-00263-JRG-RSP, with cited
`
`sections highlighted.
`
`10.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from AGIS’s
`
`Exhibit A to its June 23, 2023 Proposed Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`
`Infringement Contentions in this case, AGIS Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics
`
`Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 2:22-CV-00263-JRG-RSP, with cited
`
`sections highlighted.
`
`11.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from AGIS’s
`
`Exhibit B to its June 23, 2023 Proposed Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`
`Infringement Contentions in this case, AGIS Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics
`
`Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 2:22-CV-00263-JRG-RSP, with cited
`
`sections highlighted.
`
`12.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from AGIS’s
`
`Opening Claim Construction Brief in AGIS Software Development LLC v. Huawei Device USA
`
`Inc., No. 2:17-CV-00513-JRG-RSP, Dkt. 165, with cited sections highlighted.
`
` I
`
` declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in San
`
`Francisco, California on July 25, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 90-1 Filed 07/25/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 6374
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 25, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark Liang
`
`Mark Liang
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket