throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 5321
`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 1 of 9 PagelD #: 5321
`
`EXHIBIT 8
`EXHIBIT 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 5322
`Case 2:19-cv-00362 Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 1
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Case No. 2:19-cv-362
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`














`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software” or “Plaintiff”) files this
`
`original Complaint against Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Samsung Electronics”)
`
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung Electronics America”) (collectively
`
`“Samsung” or “Defendants”) for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and alleges as
`
`follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software is a limited liability company organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Texas, and maintains its principal place of business at 100 W.
`
`Houston Street, Marshall, Texas 75670. AGIS Software is the owner of all right, title, and
`
`interest in and to U.S. Patent Nos. 9,820,123 and 9,749,829 (the “Patents-in-Suit”).
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Samsung Electronics is a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the Republic of Korea, with its principal place of business at 129 Samsung-Ro,
`
`Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 443-742, Republic of Korea. Upon information and
`

`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 5323
`Case 2:19-cv-00362 Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 10 of 24 PageID #: 10
`

`
`COUNT I
`(Infringement of the ’123 Patent)
`
`17.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 17 are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth
`
`in their entireties.
`
`18.
`
`AGIS Software has not licensed or otherwise authorized Defendants to make, use,
`
`offer for sale, sell, or import any products that embody the inventions of the ’123 Patent.
`
`19.
`
`Defendants have and continue to directly infringe at least claim 23 of the ’123
`
`Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`selling, and/or importing into the United States the Accused Devices without authority and in
`
`violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`20.
`
`Defendants have and continue to indirectly infringe at least claim 23 of the ’123
`
`Patent by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing others to directly infringe, either
`
`literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or
`
`importing into the United States the Accused Devices and by instructing users of the Accused
`
`Devices to perform methods claimed in the ’123 Patent. For example, Defendants, with
`
`knowledge that the Accused Devices infringe the ’123 Patent at least as of the date of this
`
`Complaint, actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continue to actively, knowingly,
`
`and intentionally induce direct infringement of the ’123 Patent.
`
`21.
`
`For example, Defendants have indirectly infringed and continue to indirectly
`
`infringe at least claim 23 of the ’123 Patent in the United States because Defendants’ customers
`
`use such devices, including at least the Google Maps, Find My Device (formerly Android Device
`
`Manager), Find My Phone, Google Messages, Android Messenger, Samsung Messages, Google
`
`Hangouts, Google Plus, Google Latitude, Google Play Protect, and Google Chrome apps
`
`installed on the Accused Devices, in accordance with Defendants’ instructions and thereby
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 5324
`Case 2:19-cv-00362 Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 11 of 24 PageID #: 11
`

`
`directly infringe at least one claim of the ’123 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. Defendants
`
`directly and/or indirectly intentionally instruct its customers to infringe through training videos,
`
`demonstrations, brochures, installations and/or user guides, such as those located at one or more
`
`of the following:
`
`https://ss7.vzw.com/is/content/VerizonWireless/Devices/Samsung/note/samsung-galaxy-note9-
`
`ug.pdf and https://www.samsung.com/my/support/mobile-devices/how-do-i-use-android-device-
`
`manager-to-locate-lock-and-erase-my-lost-samsung-galaxy-s5/, and Google agents and
`
`representatives located within this Judicial District. Defendants are thereby liable for
`
`infringement of the ’123 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`22.
`
`For example, Defendants’ Accused Devices are pre-installed with at least the
`
`Google Maps app which allows users to share their locations and view other users’ locations on a
`
`map and to communicate with those users via the Google Maps app (as shown below) which is
`
`integrated with Google Messages, Android Messenger, and Samsung Messages and which are
`
`also pre-installed on the Accused Devices.
`
`23.
`
`For example, the exemplary Accused Devices allow users to establish groups and
`
`to exchange messages via interaction with Google’s servers and Samsung’s servers which
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 5325
`Case 2:19-cv-00362 Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 16 of 24 PageID #: 16
`

`
`34.
`
`Defendants have and continue to indirectly infringe at least claim 68 of the ’829
`
`Patent by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing others to directly infringe, either
`
`literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or
`
`importing into the United States the Accused Devices and by instructing users of the Accused
`
`Devices to perform methods claimed in the ’829 Patent. For example, Defendants, with
`
`knowledge that the Accused Devices infringe the ’829 Patent at least as of the date of this
`
`Complaint, actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continue to actively, knowingly,
`
`and intentionally induce direct infringement of the ’829 Patent.
`
`35.
`
`For example, Defendants have indirectly infringed and continue to indirectly
`
`infringe at least claim 68 of the ’829 Patent in the United States because Defendants’ customers
`
`use such devices, including at least the Google Maps, Find My Device (formerly Android Device
`
`Manager), Find My Phone, Google Messages, Android Messenger, Google Hangouts, Google
`
`Plus, Google Latitude, Google Play Protect, and Google Chrome apps installed on the Accused
`
`Devices, in accordance with Defendants’ instructions and thereby directly infringe at least one
`
`claim of the ’829 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. Defendants directly and/or indirectly
`
`intentionally instruct its customers to infringe through training videos, demonstrations,
`
`brochures, installations and/or user guides, such as those located at one or more of the following:
`
`https://ss7.vzw.com/is/content/VerizonWireless/Devices/Samsung/note/samsung-galaxy-note9-
`
`ug.pdf and https://www.samsung.com/my/support/mobile-devices/how-do-i-use-android-device-
`
`manager-to-locate-lock-and-erase-my-lost-samsung-galaxy-s5/, and Google agents and
`
`representatives located within this Judicial District. Defendants are thereby liable for
`
`infringement of the ’829 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 5326
`Case 2:19-cv-00362 Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 17 of 24 PageID #: 17
`

`
`36.
`
`For example, Defendants directly and/or indirectly instruct its customers to
`
`infringe through pre-installed applications in the exemplary Accused Devices as shown below.
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 5327
`Case 28456200769-dB86RSBocdARHeENtaed 1HenRage 1BaGe4 phgetporlDLg: 5327
`Case 2:19-cv-00362 Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 18 of 24 PageID #: 18

`
`Google offers an Android device-tracking application available at Android Device Manager.Signin
`to the Google Account associated with the device you wish to locate. The following dialog box displays
`over the interactive Google map.
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG
`
`f 4
`
`Last located at 5:40 PM
`Dallas, TX, USA - Accurate to 23 meters
`Last used January 17, 2014
`
`Us
`Ring
`
`a)
`Lock
`
`x
`Erase
`
`
`
`Whenyourdevice islocateditsapproximate locationisindicatedbygy on themap. Thedevice
`
`manager also displays the name of the place where the device is located, the time it was located and
`whenit waslast used. The following options are available:
`
`. A : Select a different device associated with your Google Account.
`. sf : Change the device name.
`. @® : Refresh the mapto display the location of yourdevice.
`. UJ i) : Ring yourdevice at full volume forfive minutes, even ifit is setto silentorvibrate.
`. a) : Lockthe device with a new password.
`. K : Perform a factory data reset, which permanently deletes all of your data. Google will
`attempt to erase the contents of the memory cardif it is supported by the device.
`
`
`
`
`+ iay Hap pal parisrecee epeety
`
`2eo0o
`
`Pind afd sirind leer Andioed cewek,
`
`o> WIGNT-S MEW
`
`Find My Device
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`18
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 5328
`Case 2:19-cv-00362 Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 23 of 24 PageID #: 23
`

`
`d.
`
`An order awarding damages sufficient to compensate AGIS Software for
`
`Defendants’ infringement of the Patents-in-Suit, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty,
`
`together with interest and costs;
`
`e.
`
`An order awarding AGIS Software treble damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 as a
`
`result of Defendants’ willful and deliberate infringement of the Patents-in-Suit;
`
`f.
`
`Entry of judgment declaring that this case is exceptional and awarding AGIS
`
`Software its costs and reasonable attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285; and
`
`g.
`
`Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`Dated: November 4, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`
`
`
` /s/ Samuel F. Baxter
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-9 Filed 07/13/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 5329
`Case 2:19-cv-00362 Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 24 of 24 PageID #: 24
`

`

`
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC
`
`24
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket