throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:
`5359
`
`EXHIBIT 12
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 1 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5360
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`Case No. 6:23-cv-00160
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION












`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff, AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software” or “Plaintiff”) files this
`
`Complaint against Defendant Google LLC (“Google” or “Defendant”) for patent infringement
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and alleges as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software is a limited liability company organized and existing under
`
`the laws of the State of Texas and maintains its principal place of business at 100 W. Houston
`
`Street, Marshall, Texas 75670. AGIS Software is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and
`
`to U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 (the “Patent-in-Suit”).
`
`2.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Google is a Delaware corporation, with a
`
`principal address of 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043, and has
`
`regular and established places of business throughout this District, including at least at 500 West
`
`2nd
`
`Street,
`
`Suite
`
`2900,
`
`Austin,
`
`Texas
`
`78701.
`
`See
`
`https://about.google/intl/en_us/locations/?region=north-america&office=austin.
`
` Defendant is
`
`registered to do business in Texas and may be served through its registered agent at Corporation
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 3 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5361
`
`District, and has the requisite minimum contacts with this Judicial District, such that this venue is
`
`a fair and reasonable one.
`
`PATENT-IN-SUIT
`
`7.
`
`On July 3, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”) entitled “Method of Utilizing Forced Alerts
`
`for Interactive Remote Communications.” On September 1, 2021, the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office issued an Inter Partes Review Certificate for the ’970 Patent cancelling claims
`
`1 and 3-9. On December 9, 2021, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued an
`
`Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate for the ’970 Patent determining claims 2 and 10 (as amended)
`
`and claims 11-13 to be valid and patentable. A true and correct copy of the ’970 Patent, which
`
`includes the September 1, 2021 Inter Partes Review Certificate and the December 9, 2021
`
`Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`8.
`
`AGIS is the sole and exclusive owner of all right, title, and interest in the Patent-
`
`in-Suit, and holds the exclusive right to take all actions necessary to enforce its rights to the Patent-
`
`in-Suit, including the filing of this patent infringement lawsuit. AGIS also has the right to recover
`
`all damages for past, present, and future infringement of the Patent-in-Suit and to seek injunctive
`
`relief as appropriate under the law.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`9.
`
`Malcolm K. “Cap” Beyer, Jr., a graduate of the United States Naval Academy and
`
`a former U.S. Marine, is the CEO of AGIS Software and a named inventor of the AGIS patent
`
`portfolio. AGIS Software was formed in 2017 and has since opened two offices in Texas,
`
`including one office at 2226 Washington Avenue #2, Waco, Texas 76701. AGIS Software also
`
`has a data center in Texas.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 4 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5362
`
`10. Mr. Beyer has maintained longstanding ties to Texas and the Western District. In
`
`1987, Mr. Beyer founded Advanced Programming Concepts, an Austin-based company focused
`
`on real-time tactical command and control systems. Advanced Programming Concepts was later
`
`acquired by Ultra Electronics, Inc. and is now the Advanced Tactical Systems unit of Ultra
`
`Electronics, Inc., still based in Austin, Texas.
`
`11. Mr. Beyer founded Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. (“AGIS, Inc.”)
`
`shortly after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks because he believed that many first responder
`
`and civilian lives could have been saved through the implementation of a better communication
`
`system. He envisioned and developed a new communication system that would use integrated
`
`software and hardware components on mobile devices to give users situational awareness superior
`
`to systems provided by conventional military and first responder radio systems.
`
`12.
`
`AGIS, Inc. developed prototypes that matured into its LifeRing system. LifeRing
`
`provides first responders, law enforcement, and military personnel with what is essentially a
`
`tactical operations center built into hand-held mobile devices. Using GPS-based location
`
`technology and existing or special-purpose cellular communication networks, LifeRing users can
`
`exchange location, heading, speed, and other information with other members of a group, view
`
`each other’s locations on maps and satellite images, and rapidly communicate and coordinate their
`
`efforts.
`
`13.
`
`AGIS Software licenses its patent portfolio, including the ’970 Patent to AGIS, Inc.
`
`AGIS, Inc. has marked its products accordingly. AGIS Software and all previous assignees of the
`
`Patent-in-Suit have complied with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287(a).
`
`14.
`
`Defendant manufactures, uses, sells, offers for sale, and/or imports into the United
`
`States products, such as [1] Google mobile devices, smartphones, and tablets including, but not
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 5 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5363
`
`limited to: Nexus S, Galaxy Nexus, Nexus 4, Nexus 5, Nexus 6, Nexus 5X, Nexus 6P, Nexus 7 1st
`
`Gen., Nexus 7 2nd Gen., Nexus 10, Pixel 2, Pixel 2 XL, Pixel 3, Pixel 3 XL, Pixel 3a XL, Pixel 4,
`
`Pixel 4 XL, Pixel 4a, Pixel 4a (5G), Pixel 5, Pixel 5a, Pixel 6, Pixel 6 Pro, Pixel 6a, Pixel 7, Pixel
`
`7 Pro, Pixel C, Chromebook Pixel, Google Pixelbook, Google Pixelbook Go, and Pixel Slate; and
`
`[2] the Android operating system and Android-based applications and/or services including, but
`
`not limited to, Google Find My Device (formerly Android Device Manager), Google Play Protect,
`
`Google Play Services, Google Mobile Services, Google Maps, Google Messages, and Google
`
`Chrome (collectively, “Accused Products”), as well as Google’s servers for running the
`
`aforementioned applications and services. The Accused Products include applications and
`
`software including, but not limited to, the above-listed applications and/or features as components
`
`of its operating system and as downloads from a pre-installed application store, such as the Play
`
`Store, in the Accused Products. The Accused Products, together with Google’s software
`
`components such as, but not limited to, Google Find My Device (formerly Android Device
`
`Manager), Google Play Protect, Google Play Services, Google Mobile Services, Google Maps,
`
`Google Messages, and Google Chrome applications and services which are configured to interact
`
`with Google’s servers which provide services related to the above Android OS and Android-based
`
`applications and services, among other services provided by Google and utilized by Google’s
`
`customers when operating the Accused Products, such as the Google mobile devices, smartphones,
`
`and tablets identified herein.
`
`15.
`
`The Accused Products include functionalities that allow users to share and view
`
`locations with other users, display symbols corresponding to locations (including locations of other
`
`users or entities) on a map, and initiate communications with other users through the interface of
`
`the Accused Products. The Accused Products include the functionalities to display map
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 6 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5364
`
`information, including symbols corresponding with users, entities, and locations. The Accused
`
`Products further include the functionalities to remotely control their own lost or stolen devices.
`
`The Accused Products further include functionalities to send a forced message alert to which a
`
`required response must be transmitted.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 7 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5365
`
`1
`
`
`1 https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6160491?hl=en
`
`
` 2
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 11 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5366
`
`correct geographical location of the recipient PDA/cellphone based on at least the location data.
`
`For example, the Accused Products include features as shown below.
`
`3
`
`
`3 https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6160491?hl=en
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 12 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5367
`
`4
`
`5
`
`
`4 https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6160491?hl=en
`5 https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6160491?hl=en#zippy=%2Cuse-find-my-device-
`app
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 13 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5368
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`6
`https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.apps.adm&hl=en_US&gl=US
`&pli=1
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 14 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5369
`
`7
`
`23.
`
`AGIS Software has suffered damages as a result of Defendant’s direct and indirect
`
`infringement of the ’970 Patent in an amount to be proved at trial.
`
`24.
`
`AGIS Software has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable harm as a result
`
`of Defendant’s infringement of the ’970 Patent for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless
`
`Defendant’s infringement is enjoined by this Court.
`
`25.
`
`Defendant has committed and continues to commit acts of infringement that
`
`Defendant actually knew or should have known constituted an unjustifiably high risk of
`
`infringement of at least one valid and enforceable claim of the ’970 Patent. Defendant’s
`
`
`
`7
`https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.apps.adm&hl=en_US&gl=US
`&pli=1
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00160-DC-DTG Document 1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 16 of 16Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-13 Filed 07/13/23 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:
`
`5370
`
`Dated: March 1, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/Raymond W. Mort, III
`Raymond W. Mort, III
`Texas Bar No. 00791308
`Email: raymort@austinlaw.com
`THE MORT LAW FIRM, PLLC
`100 Congress Avenue, Suite 2000
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Tel/Fax: 512-865-7950
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice to be filed)
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice to be filed
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice to be filed)
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
`Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`16
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket