throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:
`5334
`
`EXHIBIT 10
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 2 of 21 PageID #:
`5335
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-____
`
`In the Matter of:
`
`CERTAIN LOCATION-SHARING
`SYSTEMS, RELATED SOFTWARE,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 337
`OF THE TARIFF ACT OF 1930, AS AMENDED
`
`Complainants:
`
`Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc.
`92 Lighthouse Dr.
`Jupiter, FL 33469
`Telephone: (561) 744-3213
`
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`100 West Houston Street
`Marshall, TX 75671
`Telephone: (903) 702-1954
`
`Counsel for Complainant:
`
`Evan H. Langdon
`FABRICANT LLP
`1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 300,
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (646) 797-4277
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`Peter Lambrianakos
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`Justine Minseon Park
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206
`South Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (646) 797-4277
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`Proposed Respondents:
`
`Google LLC
`1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
`Mountain View, CA 94043
`Telephone: (650) 253-0000
`
`Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.
`12 Samsung-Ro
`Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu
`Suwon, 443-742, South Korea
`Telephone: (822) 225-0114
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`85 Challenger Rd.
`Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660
`Telephone: (201) 229-4000
`
`OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
`18F, Tairan Building, Block C
`Tairan 8th Road
`Chgongmiao, Futian District
`Shenzhen, Guangdong 518040, China
`
`TCL Technology Group Corporation
`22/F, TCL Technology Building, No. 17
`Huifeng 3rd Road
`Zhongkai High-Tech Development District
`Huizhou, Guangdong, China 516006
`
`TCL Electronics Holdings Limited
`7th Floor, Building 22E
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 3 of 21 PageID #:
`5336
`
`Matthew D. Aichele
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`800 Maine Ave. SW, Suite 200
`Washington, DC 20024
`Telephone: (202) 664-0623
`E-mail: maichele@raklaw.com
`
`
`22 Science Park East Avenue
`Hong Kong Science Park
`Hong Kong
`
`TCL Communication Technology Holdings
`Limited
`5/F, Building 22E,
`22 Science Park East Avenue
`Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin,
`New Territories, Hong Kong
`
`TCT Mobile (US) Inc.
`25 Edelman, Suite 200
`Irvine, CA 92618
`Telephone: (949) 892-2990
`
`Lenovo Group Ltd.
`6 Chuang ye Road, Haidian District
`Beijing 100085, China
`Telephone: (852) 2590-0228
`
`Lenovo (United States) Inc.
`1009 Think Place, Building One
`Morrisville, NC 27560
`Telephone: (855) 253-6686
`
`Motorola Mobility LLC
`222 W Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone: (800) 668-6765
`
`HMD Global
`Karaportti 2, FIN-02610
`Espoo, Finland
`
`HMD Global OY
`Bertel Jungin aukio 9, 02600
`Espoo, Finland
`
`HMD America, Inc.
`1200 Brickell Ave., Suite 510
`Miami, FL 33131
`
`Sony Corporation
`1-7-1 Konan Minato-ku
`Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 4 of 21 PageID #:
`5337
`
`Telephone: 81-3-6748-2111
`
`Sony Mobile Communications, Inc.
`4-12-3 Higashi-Shinagawa, Shinagawa-ku
`Tokyo, 140-0002, Japan
`Telephone: (855) 806-8464
`
`ASUSTek Computer Inc.
`No. 15, Li-Te Rd.
`Beitou Dist., Taipei 112, Taiwan
`Telephone: (866) 2-2894-3447
`
`ASUS Computer International
`48720 Kato Rd.
`Fremont, CA 94538
`Telephone: (510) 739-3777
`
`Caterpillar Inc.
`100 NE Adams St.
`Peoria, IL 61629
`Telephone: (309) 675-2337
`
`BLU Products
`10814 NW 33rd Street
`Doral, FL 33172
`Telephone: (877) 639-6393
`
`Panasonic Corporation
`1006 Oaza Kadoma-shi
`Kadoma 571-8501
`Osaka, Japan
`Phone: +81-6-6908-1121
`Fax: +81-6-6908-2351
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America
`1 Panasonic Way
`Secaucus, New Jersey 07094
`Phone: (201) 348-7000
`Fax: (201) 348-7016
`
`Kyocera Corporation
`6 Takeda Tobadono-cho, Fushmi-ku
`Kyoto, Japan 612-8501
`
`Xiaomi Corporation
`Maples Corporate Services Limited
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 5 of 21 PageID #:
`5338
`
`P.O. Box 309
`Ugland House
`Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands
`
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`Xiaomi H.K. Ltd.
`Unit 806, Tower 2 8/F
`Cheung Sha Wan Plaza
`833 Cheung Sha Wan Road
`Kowloon City, Hong Kong
`
`Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
`Xiaomi Office Building
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`Xiaomi Inc.
`Xiaomi Office Building
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 6 of 21 PageID #:
`5339
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This Complaint is filed by AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”)
`
`and Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. (“AGIS, Inc.”) (collectively, “AGIS” or
`
`“Complainants”), pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337
`
`(“Section 337”), based on the unlawful offer for sale for importation into the United States, sale
`
`for importation into the United States, importation into the United States, and/or sale within the
`
`United States after importation of certain location-sharing systems, related software, components
`
`thereof, and products containing same (“Accused Products”) by proposed Respondents: Google
`
`LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., OnePlus Technology
`
`(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., TCL Technology Group Corporation, TCL Communication Technology
`
`Holdings Limited, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCT Mobile (US), Inc., Lenovo Group
`
`Ltd., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, HMD Global, HMD Global OY, HMD
`
`America, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications, Inc., ASUSTek Computer Inc.,
`
`ASUS Computer International, Caterpillar Inc., BLU Products, Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`
`Panasonic Corporation of America, Kyocera Corporation, Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi H.K. Ltd.,
`
`Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., and Xiaomi Inc. (the “Proposed Respondents”).
`
`2.
`
`Proposed Respondents’ Accused Products infringe one or more claims of U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 8,213,970 (“the ’970 Patent, attached as Ex. 1); 9,467,838 (“the ’838 patent,” attached
`
`as Ex. 2); 9,445,251 (“the ’251 patent,” attached as Ex. 3); 9,749,829 (“the ’829 patent,” attached
`
`as Ex. 4); and 9,820,123 (“the ’123 patent,” attached as Ex. 5) (collectively, “the Asserted AGIS
`
`Patents”), in violation of Section 337(a)(1)(B).
`
`3.
`
`The Accused Products infringe at least the following claims of the Asserted AGIS
`
`Patents in violation of Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i) and 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a)-(c), either literally or under
`
`the doctrine of equivalents:
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 7 of 21 PageID #:
`5340
`
`14.
`
`AGIS Software obtained the intellectual property of AGIS Inc. and AGIS Holdings
`
`and holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the Asserted AGIS Software Patents.
`
`15.
`
`Complainants have dedicated significant labor and financial resources in the United
`
`States to invent, design, develop, engineer, test, and calibrate several improved location-sharing
`
`systems, devices, and software. As a result of Complainants’ investments, it has developed certain
`
`valuable know-how relating to the design, development, engineering, assembly, and testing of
`
`location-sharing systems, related software, and products, and to the distribution and sale of such
`
`location-sharing devices and software. Furthermore, as discussed below in Section IV,
`
`Complainants filed patent applications to protect certain aspects of these improved location-
`
`sharing devices and software. Those filings have resulted in multiple issued United States patents,
`
`including the Asserted AGIS Patents.
`
`B.
`
`16.
`
`The Proposed Respondents
`
`On information and belief, the Proposed Respondents include original equipment
`
`manufacturers, re-sellers, and distributors, including agents therefor, that import, sell for
`
`importation, offer for sale, and/or sell within the United States after importation of location-sharing
`
`systems, related software, components thereof, and products containing same that infringe one or
`
`more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents.
`
`1. Google LLC
`
`17.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Google LLC (“Google”) is a
`
`limited liability company organized and existing under the State of Delaware, with its principal
`
`place of business at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043. On
`
`information and belief, Google manufactures, imports into the United States, sells for importation,
`
`markets, offers for sale, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation Accused
`
`Products that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more
`
`20
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 8 of 21 PageID #:
`5341
`
`claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i).
`
`The Google Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the Asserted
`
`AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`2. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`18.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is
`
`a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea, with its principal
`
`place of business at 129 Samsung-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 443-742,
`
`Republic of Korea. On information and belief, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. manufactures the
`
`Accused Products in Korea and imports, sells for importation, offers for sale, and/or sells within
`
`the United States after importation the Accused Products.
`
`19.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York, with its principal place of
`
`business at 85 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660. On information and belief, Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc. imports, sells for importation, markets, offers for sale, sells, and
`
`distributes within the United States after importation the Accused Products manufactured by
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`20.
`
`On information and belief, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc. are related entities; these entities are therefore collectively referred to herein as
`
`“Samsung.”
`
`21.
`
`As further detailed below, Samsung manufactures, imports into the United States,
`
`sells for importation, markets, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation one
`
`or more Accused Products that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents,
`
`one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section
`
`21
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 9 of 21 PageID #:
`5342
`
`337(a)(1)(B)(i). The Samsung Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims
`
`of the Asserted AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`3. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
`
`22.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen)
`
`Co., Ltd. (“OnePlus”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of China, with its
`
`principal place of business located at 18F, Tairan Building, Block C, Tairan 8th Road,
`
`Chegongmiao, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518040, China. On information and belief,
`
`OnePlus manufactures, imports into the United States, sells for importation, markets, offers for
`
`sale, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation the Accused Products that
`
`directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the
`
`Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i). The
`
`OnePlus Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS
`
`Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`4. TCL Technology Group Corporation, TCL Communication Technology
`Holdings Limited, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, and TCT Mobile
`(US) Inc.
`
`23.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent TCL Technology Group
`
`Corporation f/k/a TCL Corporation (“TCL Technology”) is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of China, with its principal place of business at 22/F, TCL Technology Building,
`
`No. 17, Huifeng 3rd Road, Zhongkai High-Tech Development District, Huizhou, Guangdong,
`
`China 516006.1 On information and belief, TCL Technology manufactures the Accused Products
`

`1 See Ironworks Patents, LLC v. TCL Comm’n Tech. Hldgs. Ltd. et al., No. 2:18-cv-02472-AB-
`AGR, Dkt. 46 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2018).
`
`22
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 10 of 21 PageID #:
`5343
`
`5. Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo (United States) Inc., and Motorola Mobility
`LLC
`
`29.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Lenovo Group Ltd. (“Lenovo
`
`Group”) is a company organized and existing under the laws of China, with its principal place of
`
`business located at 6 Chuang ye Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China. On information
`
`and belief, Lenovo Group manufactures, imports, sells for importation, offers for sale, and/or sells
`
`within the United States after importation the Lenovo Accused Products.
`
`30.
`
`Proposed Respondent Lenovo (United States) Inc. (“Lenovo US”) is a Delaware
`
`Corporation with its principal place of business at 1009 Think Place, Building One, Morrisville,
`
`NC 27560. On information and belief, Lenovo US manufactures, imports, sells for importation,
`
`offers for sale, and/or sells within the United States after importation the Accused Products.
`
`31.
`
`Respondent Motorola Mobility LLC (“Motorola”) is a Delaware limited liability
`
`company with its principal place of business at 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800,
`
`Chicago, IL 60654. On information and belief, Motorola manufactures, imports, sells for
`
`importation, offers for sale, and/or sells within the United States after importation the Accused
`
`Products.
`
`32.
`
`On information and belief, Lenovo Group, Lenovo US, and Motorola are related
`
`entities; these entities are therefore collectively referred to herein as “Lenovo.”
`
`33.
`
`As further detailed below, Lenovo manufactures, imports into the United States,
`
`sells for importation, markets, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation one
`
`or more Accused Products that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents,
`
`one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section
`
`337(a)(1)(B)(i). The Lenovo Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims
`
`of the Asserted AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`25
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 11 of 21 PageID #:
`5344
`
`6. HMD Global, HMD Global OY, and HMD America, Inc.
`
`34.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent HMD Global (“HMD Global”) is
`
`a company organized and existing under the laws of Finland, with its principal place of business
`
`located at Karaportti 2, FIN-02610, Espoo, Finland. On information and belief, HMD Global
`
`manufactures, imports, sells for importation, offers for sale, and/or sells within the United States
`
`after importation the HMD Accused Products.
`
`35.
`
`Proposed Respondent HMD Global OY (“HMD Global OY”) is a company
`
`organized and existing under the laws of Finland, with its principal place of business at Bertel
`
`Jungin aukio 9, 02600, Espoo, Finland. On information and belief, HMD Global OY
`
`manufactures, imports, sells for importation, offers for sale, and/or sells within the United States
`
`after importation the Accused Products.
`
`36.
`
`Proposed Respondent HMD America, Inc. (“HMD America”) is a corporation
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the state of Florida, with its principal place of business at
`
`1200 Brickell Ave., Suite 510, Miami, Florida 33131. On information and belief, HMD America
`
`offers for sale and/or sells within the United States after importation the Accused Products.
`
`37.
`
`On information and belief, HMD Global, HMD Global OY, and HMD America are
`
`related entities; these entities are therefore collectively referred to herein as “HMD.”
`
`38.
`
`As further detailed below, HMD manufactures, imports into the United States, sells
`
`for importation, markets, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation one or
`
`more Accused Products that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents,
`
`one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section
`
`337(a)(1)(B)(i). The HMD Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims
`
`of the Asserted AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`26
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 12 of 21 PageID #:
`5345
`
`7. Sony Corporation and Sony Mobile Communications, Inc.
`
`39.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Sony Corporation (“Sony
`
`Corporation”) is a company organized and existing under the laws of Japan, with its principal place
`
`of business located at 1-7-1 Konan Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan. On information and
`
`belief, Sony Corporation manufactures, imports, sells for importation, offers for sale, and/or sells
`
`within the United States after importation the Sony Accused Products.
`
`40.
`
`Proposed Respondent Sony Mobile Communications, Inc. (“Sony Mobile”) is a
`
`corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York with its principal place
`
`of business at 4-12-3 Higashi-Shinagawa, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 140-0002, Japan. On
`
`information and belief, Sony Mobile manufactures, imports, sells for importation, offers for sale,
`
`and/or sells within the United States after importation the Accused Products.
`
`41.
`
`On information and belief, Sony Corporation and Sony Mobile are related entities;
`
`these entities are therefore collectively referred to herein as “Sony.”
`
`42.
`
`As further detailed below, Sony manufactures, imports into the United States, sells
`
`for importation, markets, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation one or
`
`more Accused Products that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents,
`
`one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section
`
`337(a)(1)(B)(i). The Sony Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of
`
`the Asserted AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`8. ASUSTek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International
`
`43.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent ASUSTek Computer Inc.
`
`(“ASUSTek Computer”) is a company organized and existing under the laws of Taiwan, with its
`
`principal place of business located at No. 15, Li-Te Rd., Beitou District, Taipei City 112, Taiwan.
`
`27
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 13 of 21 PageID #:
`5346
`
`On information and belief, ASUSTek Computer manufactures, imports, sells for importation,
`
`offers for sale, and/or sells within the United States after importation the ASUS Accused Products.
`
`44.
`
`Proposed Respondent ASUS Computer International (“ASUS Computer”) is a
`
`company organized and existing under the laws of State of California, with its principal place of
`
`business at 48720 Kato Road, Fremont, California 94538. On information and belief, ASUS
`
`Computer manufactures, imports, sells for importation, offers for sale, and/or sells within the
`
`United States after importation the Accused Products.
`
`45.
`
`On information and belief, ASUSTek Computer and ASUS Computer are related
`
`entities; these entities are therefore collectively referred to herein as “ASUS.”
`
`46.
`
`As further detailed below, ASUS manufactures, imports into the United States, sells
`
`for importation, markets, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation one or
`
`more Accused Products that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents,
`
`one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section
`
`337(a)(1)(B)(i). The ASUS Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims
`
`of the Asserted AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`9. Caterpillar Inc.
`
`47.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Caterpillar Inc. (“Caterpillar”) is
`
`a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, with its principal
`
`place of business located at 100 NE Adams St., Peoria, Illinois 61629 . On information and belief,
`
`Caterpillar manufactures, imports into the United States, sells for importation, markets, offers for
`
`sale, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation the Accused Products that
`
`directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the
`
`Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i). The
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 14 of 21 PageID #:
`5347
`
`Caterpillar Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the Asserted
`
`AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`10. BLU Products, Inc.
`
`48.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent BLU Products, Inc. (“BLU”) is a
`
`corporation organized and existing under laws of the state of Florida, with its principal place of
`
`business located at 10814 NW 33rd Street, Doral, Florida 33172. On information and belief, BLU
`
`manufactures, imports into the United States, sells for importation, markets, offers for sale, sells,
`
`and distributes within the United States after importation the Accused Products that directly
`
`infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the Asserted
`
`AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i). The BLU Accused
`
`Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents at the
`
`time of importation into the United States.
`
`11. Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America
`
`49.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Panasonic Corporation is a
`
`corporation organized under the laws of Japan and headquartered at 1006, Oaza Kadoma, Kadoma-
`
`shi, Osaka 571-8501, Japan. On information and belief, Panasonic Corporation manufactures the
`
`Accused Products in Japan and imports, sells for importation, offers for sale, and/or sells within
`
`the United States after importation the Accused Products.
`
`50.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Panasonic Corporation of North
`
`America is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New Jersey and
`
`headquartered at Two Riverfront Plaza, 828 McCarter Highway, Newark, New Jersey 07102. On
`
`information and belief, Panasonic Corporation of North America imports, sells for importation,
`
`markets, offers for sale, sells, and distributes within the United States after importation the
`
`Accused Products manufactured by Panasonic Corporation.
`
`29
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 15 of 21 PageID #:
`5348
`
`51.
`
`On information and belief, Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of
`
`North America are related entities; these entities are therefore collectively referred to herein as
`
`“Panasonic.”
`
`52.
`
`As further detailed below, Panasonic manufactures, imports into the United States,
`
`sells for importation, markets, offers for sale, sells, and distributes within the United States after
`
`importation the Accused Products that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents, one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a)
`
`and Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i). The Panasonic Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one
`
`or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`12. Kyocera Corporation
`
`53.
`
`On
`
`information and belief, Proposed Respondent Kyocera Corporation
`
`(“Kyocera”) is a corporation organized under the laws of Japan with a place of business at 6 Takeda
`
`Tobadono-cho, Fushmi-ku, Kyoto, Japan 612-8501. On information and belief, Kyocera
`
`manufactures, imports into the United States, sells for importation, markets, offers for sale, sells,
`
`and distributes within the United States after importation the Accused Products that directly
`
`infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the Asserted
`
`AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i). The Kyocera
`
`Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents
`
`at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`13. Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi H.K.
`Ltd., and Xiaomi Inc.
`
`54.
`
`On information and belief, Proposed Respondent Xiaomi Corporation is a
`
`corporation organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands with a place of business at Maples
`
`Corporate Services Limited, P.O. Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman
`
`30
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 16 of 21 PageID #:
`5349
`
`58.
`
`On information and belief, Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi H.K. Ltd., Xiaomi
`
`Communications Co., Ltd., and Xiaomi Inc. are related entities; these entities are therefore
`
`collectively referred to herein as “Xiaomi.”
`
`59.
`
`On information and belief, Xiaomi manufactures, imports into the United States,
`
`sells for importation, markets, offers for sale, sells, and distributes within the United States after
`
`importation the Accused Products that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents, one or more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a)
`
`and Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i). The Xiaomi Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of one or
`
`more claims of the Asserted AGIS Patents at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`III. THE TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTS AT ISSUE
`
`60.
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. §§ 210.10(b)(1) and 210.12(a)(12), the categories of products
`
`accused of infringing one or more of the Asserted AGIS Patents are mobile devices containing
`
`location-sharing software, mobile phones and tablets containing location-sharing software,
`
`notebook and laptop computers containing location- sharing software, and associated components
`
`thereof. Proposed Respondents infringe the Asserted AGIS Patents through the sale for
`
`importation into the United States, importation into the United States, and/or sale within the United
`
`States after importation of such Accused Products. Exemplary identifications of such infringing
`
`products are provided in Section VI below.
`
`61. Without discovery, Complainants cannot exhaustively identify all devices sold for
`
`importation into the United States, imported into the United States, and/or sold within the United
`
`States after importation that infringe the Asserted AGIS Patents. Complainants reserve the right
`
`to supplement its allegations, to further amend this Complaint, and to add respondents and accused
`
`products in the future, if necessary, based on discovery received during the Investigation.
`
`32
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 17 of 21 PageID #:
`5350
`
`series of photographs of the product. Labels on the product state that the product was “Made in
`
`Japan.” Exhibit 131.
`
`M.
`
`Xiaomi
`
`139. On information and belief, Xiaomi imports, sells for importation, and/or sells
`
`within the United States after importation, the Xiaomi Accused Products, including the
`
`representative Xiaomi 11T, that infringe the Asserted Patents.
`
`140. The specific instances set forth below are representative examples of Xiaomi’s
`
`unlawful importation, sale for importation, and/or sale within the United States after importation
`
`of infringing products.
`
`141. Prior to filing the Complaint, representatives for Complainants purchased the
`
`representative Accused Products in the United States. Exhibit 133 includes a copy of the receipt
`
`for purchase in the United States of a representative product and Exhibits 134 - 135 include a
`
`series of photographs of the product. Labels on the product state that the product was “Made in
`
`China.” Exhibit 134.
`
`VI. UNLAWFUL AND UNFAIR ACTS OF THE PROPOSED RESPONDENTS
`
`142. Complainants assert that Proposed Respondents infringe, literally and/or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, at least the following claims of the Asserted Patents, in violation of 35
`
`U.S.C. §§ 271(a), (b), and (c). Without discovery, Complainants cannot exhaustively identify all
`
`devices sold for importation into the United States, imported into the United States, and/or sold
`
`within the United States after importation that infringe the Asserted Patents. Complainants reserve
`
`their right to supplement its allegations, to further amend this Complaint, and to add respondents
`
`and accused products in the future, if necessary, based on discovery received during the
`
`Investigation.
`
`48
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 18 of 21 PageID #:
`5351
`
`Respondent
`Google
`Samsung Respondents
`OnePlus
`TCL Respondents
`Lenovo Respondents
`HMD Respondents
`Sony Respondents
`ASUS Respondents
`Caterpillar
`BLU
`Panasonic
`Kyocera
`Xiaomi
`Google
`
`Samsung Respondents
`
`OnePlus
`
`TCL Respondents
`
`Lenovo Respondents
`
`HMD Respondents
`
`Sony Respondents
`
`ASUS Respondents
`
`Caterpillar
`
`BLU
`
`Panasonic
`
`Kyocera
`
`Xiaomi
`Google
`Samsung Respondents
`
`Claims
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`2, 10-13
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40,
`54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, 84
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`
`Patent No.
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’970 Patent
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`
`’838 Patent
`’251 Patent
`’251 Patent
`
`49
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 85-11 Filed 07/13/23 Page 19 of 21 PageID #:
`5352
`
`Respondent
`OnePlus
`TCL Respondents
`Lenovo Respondents
`HMD Respondents
`Sony Respondents
`ASUS Respondents
`Caterpillar
`BLU
`Panasonic
`Kyocera
`Xiaomi
`Google
`Samsung Respondents
`OnePlus
`TCL Respondents
`Lenovo Respondents
`HMD Respondents
`Sony Respondents
`ASUS Respondents
`Caterpillar
`BLU
`Panasonic
`Kyocera
`Xiaomi
`Google
`Samsung Respondents
`OnePlus
`TCL Respondents
`Lenovo Respondents
`HMD Respondents
`Sony Respondents
`ASUS Respondents
`Caterpillar
`BLU
`Panasonic
`Kyocera
`
`Claims
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-31, 35
`1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28-3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket