`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00263-JRG-RSP
`
`§
`§
`§
`
`§§
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
`LTD., ET AL.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`ORDER
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`and Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Defendants”) previously filed a motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 39.) Magistrate Judge Payne
`
`entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 54) recommending denial of Defendants’
`
`motion. Defendants have now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 55), with AGIS Software Development
`
`LLC filing a Response (Dkt. No. 60). Thereafter, Defendants filed a motion for leave to file a
`
`one-page Reply in support of its Objections (Dkt. No. 61), accompanied with said one-page
`
`Reply (Dkt. No. 62), per the local rules. The Court has seen and considered this one-page Reply.
`
`Defendants motion for leave to file a one-page Reply in support of its Objections (Dkt.
`
`No. 61), is hereby GRANTED. Nonetheless, after conducting a de novo review of the briefing
`
`on the motion to dismiss, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Defendants’
`
`Objections,
`
`the Court agrees with
`
`the reasoning provided within
`
`the Report and
`
`Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and
`
`Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendants’
`
`Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ORDERS that Defendants’
`
`motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 39) is DENIED.
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 63 Filed 05/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1815
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of May, 2023.
`
`