throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 03/16/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1653
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:22-CV-263-JRG-RSP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. AND SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR HEARING ON
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.’S (1) PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
`AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12(B)(6) AND (2) MOTION TO STAY
`
`Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,
`
`(collectively, “Defendants”), respectfully move for a hearing, at
`
`the Court’s earliest
`
`convenience, on Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Under
`
`Rule 12(b)(6) and Defendants’ Motion to Stay.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff filed its Sur-Replies in Further Opposition to Defendants’ Partial Motion to
`
`Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 45) and Motion to Stay (Dkt.
`
`46) on January 25, 2023. Accordingly, Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended
`
`Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) and Defendants’ Motion to Stay were fully briefed and ripe for
`
`consideration on January 25, 2023.
`
`
`
`Defendants’ Partial Motion
`
`to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Under
`
`Rule 12(b)(6) and Motion to Stay are important, and oral argument should aid the Court in
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 03/16/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1654
`
`
`
`resolving them. Plaintiff does not oppose the request for a hearing on the Partial Motion to Dismiss
`
`Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) and Motion to Stay.
`
`Dated: March 16, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Neil P. Sirota
`neil.sirota@bakerbotts.com
`Margaret M. Welsh
`margaret.welsh@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`30 Rockefeller Plaza
`New York, New York 10112-4498
`Telephone: (212) 408-2500
`Facsimile: (212) 408-2501
`
`Melissa R. Smith
`Texas Bar No. 24001351
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`
`Counsel for Defendants Samsung
`Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung
`America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 03/16/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1655
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on March 16, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`On March 15, 2023, pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h), counsel for Defendants met and
`
`conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and counsel for Plaintiff indicated that Plaintiff is unopposed
`
`to the relief sought by this Motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket