Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1167
`
`Exhibit 1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 1168
`
` 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`November 16, 2022
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`The Honorable Katherine M. Hiner
`Acting Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112-A
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Re:
`
`Certain Location-Sharing Systems, Related Software, Components Thereof, and Products
`Containing Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-____
`
`
`Dear Acting Secretary Hiner:
`
`
`In accordance with the Commission’s Temporary Change to the Filing Procedures, dated
`March 16, 2020, enclosed for filing on behalf of Complainants Advanced Ground Information
`Systems, Inc. and AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS” or “Complainants”) are the
`following documents in support of Complainants’ request that the Commission commence an
`investigation pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended:
`
`1. One (1) electronic copy of the verified Non-Confidential Complaint and the Public
`Interest Statement. (19 C.F.R. §§ 210.8(a)(1)(i) and 210.8(b));
`
`2. One (1) electronic copy of Complainants’ letter and certification requesting
`confidential treatment for the information contained in the Confidential Exhibit Nos. 136C - 144C.
`(19 C.F.R. §§ 210.5(d) and 201.6(b));
`
`3. One (1) electronic copy of the accompanying Non-Confidential Exhibits and public
`versions of the Confidential Exhibits. (19 C.F.R. § 210.8(a)(1)(i));
`
`4. One (1) electronic copy of the Confidential Exhibits Nos. 136C - 144C. (19 C.F.R.
`§§ 210.8(a)(1)(ii) and 201.6(c));
`
`5. One (1) electronic copy of the certified version of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970 (“the
`’970 Patent); 9,467,838 (“the ’838 patent”); 9,445,251 (“the ’251 patent”); 9,749,829 (“the ’829
`patent”); and 9,820,123 (“the ’123 patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted AGIS Patents”) cited in
`the Complaint as Exhibits 1-5. (19 C.F.R. § 210.12(a)(9)(i));
`
` 
` 
`FABRICANT LLP | FABRICANTLLP.COM |1101 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., SUITE 300, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004
` 
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 3 of 15 PageID #: 1169
`
`
`
`November 16, 2022
`Pg.2
`
`
`6. One (1) electronic copy of the certified version of each of the assignments for the
`Asserted AGIS Patents cited in the Complaint as Exhibits 71 - 75. (19 C.F.R. § 210.12(a)(9)(ii));
`
`7. One (1) electronic copy of the certified version of the prosecution history for the
`Asserted AGIS Patents included as Appendix Nos. A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1 to the Complaint. (19
`C.F.R. § 210.12(c)(1));
`
`8. One (1) electronic copy of the patent and technical reference documents identified in
`the prosecution history of the Asserted AGIS Patents, included in the Complaint as Appendix Nos.
`A2, B2, C2, D2, and E2 (19 C.F.R. § 210.12(c)(2)).
`
`Please contact me with any questions regarding this submission. Thank you for your
`attention to this matter.
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`Evan H. Langdon
`
`Counsel for Complainants AGIS Software
`Development LLC and Advanced Ground
`Information Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
` 
`FABRICANT LLP | FABRICANTLLP.COM |1101 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., SUITE 300, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 4 of 15 PageID #: 1170
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-____
`
`In the Matter of:
`
`CERTAIN LOCATION-SHARING
`SYSTEMS, RELATED SOFTWARE,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 337
`OF THE TARIFF ACT OF 1930, AS AMENDED
`
`Complainants:
`
`Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc.
`92 Lighthouse Dr.
`Jupiter, FL 33469
`Telephone: (561) 744-3213
`
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`100 West Houston Street
`Marshall, TX 75671
`Telephone: (903) 702-1954
`
`Counsel for Complainant:
`
`Evan H. Langdon
`FABRICANT LLP
`1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 300,
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (646) 797-4277
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`Peter Lambrianakos
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`Justine Minseon Park
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206
`South Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (646) 797-4277
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`Proposed Respondents:
`
`Google LLC
`1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
`Mountain View, CA 94043
`Telephone: (650) 253-0000
`
`Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.
`12 Samsung-Ro
`Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu
`Suwon, 443-742, South Korea
`Telephone: (822) 225-0114
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`85 Challenger Rd.
`Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660
`Telephone: (201) 229-4000
`
`OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
`18F, Tairan Building, Block C
`Tairan 8th Road
`Chgongmiao, Futian District
`Shenzhen, Guangdong 518040, China
`
`TCL Technology Group Corporation
`22/F, TCL Technology Building, No. 17
`Huifeng 3rd Road
`Zhongkai High-Tech Development District
`Huizhou, Guangdong, China 516006
`
`TCL Electronics Holdings Limited
`7th Floor, Building 22E
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 5 of 15 PageID #: 1171
`
`Matthew D. Aichele
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`800 Maine Ave. SW, Suite 200
`Washington, DC 20024
`Telephone: (202) 664-0623
`E-mail: maichele@raklaw.com
`
`
`22 Science Park East Avenue
`Hong Kong Science Park
`Hong Kong
`
`TCL Communication Technology Holdings
`Limited
`5/F, Building 22E,
`22 Science Park East Avenue
`Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin,
`New Territories, Hong Kong
`
`TCT Mobile (US) Inc.
`25 Edelman, Suite 200
`Irvine, CA 92618
`Telephone: (949) 892-2990
`
`Lenovo Group Ltd.
`6 Chuang ye Road, Haidian District
`Beijing 100085, China
`Telephone: (852) 2590-0228
`
`Lenovo (United States) Inc.
`1009 Think Place, Building One
`Morrisville, NC 27560
`Telephone: (855) 253-6686
`
`Motorola Mobility LLC
`222 W Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone: (800) 668-6765
`
`HMD Global
`Karaportti 2, FIN-02610
`Espoo, Finland
`
`HMD Global OY
`Bertel Jungin aukio 9, 02600
`Espoo, Finland
`
`HMD America, Inc.
`1200 Brickell Ave., Suite 510
`Miami, FL 33131
`
`Sony Corporation
`1-7-1 Konan Minato-ku
`Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 6 of 15 PageID #: 1172
`
`Telephone: 81-3-6748-2111
`
`Sony Mobile Communications, Inc.
`4-12-3 Higashi-Shinagawa, Shinagawa-ku
`Tokyo, 140-0002, Japan
`Telephone: (855) 806-8464
`
`ASUSTek Computer Inc.
`No. 15, Li-Te Rd.
`Beitou Dist., Taipei 112, Taiwan
`Telephone: (866) 2-2894-3447
`
`ASUS Computer International
`48720 Kato Rd.
`Fremont, CA 94538
`Telephone: (510) 739-3777
`
`Caterpillar Inc.
`100 NE Adams St.
`Peoria, IL 61629
`Telephone: (309) 675-2337
`
`BLU Products
`10814 NW 33rd Street
`Doral, FL 33172
`Telephone: (877) 639-6393
`
`Panasonic Corporation
`1006 Oaza Kadoma-shi
`Kadoma 571-8501
`Osaka, Japan
`Phone: +81-6-6908-1121
`Fax: +81-6-6908-2351
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America
`1 Panasonic Way
`Secaucus, New Jersey 07094
`Phone: (201) 348-7000
`Fax: (201) 348-7016
`
`Kyocera Corporation
`6 Takeda Tobadono-cho, Fushmi-ku
`Kyoto, Japan 612-8501
`
`Xiaomi Corporation
`Maples Corporate Services Limited
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 7 of 15 PageID #: 1173
`
`P.O. Box 309
`Ugland House
`Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands
`
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`Xiaomi H.K. Ltd.
`Unit 806, Tower 2 8/F
`Cheung Sha Wan Plaza
`833 Cheung Sha Wan Road
`Kowloon City, Hong Kong
`
`Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
`Xiaomi Office Building
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`Xiaomi Inc.
`Xiaomi Office Building
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 8 of 15 PageID #: 1174
`
`importation and sale of Accused Products that infringe the Asserted Patent literally and/or under
`
`the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`A.
`
`Google
`
`103. On information and belief, Google imports, sells for importation, and/or sells within
`
`the United States after importation, the Google Accused Products, including the representative
`
`Google Pixel 6, that infringe the Asserted Patents.
`
`104. The specific instances set forth below are representative examples of Google’s
`
`unlawful importation, sale for importation, and/or sale within the United States after importation
`
`of infringing products.
`
`105. Prior to filing the Complaint, representatives for Complainants purchased the
`
`representative Accused Products in the United States. Exhibit 76 includes a copy of the receipt
`
`for purchase in the United States of a representative product and Exhibits 77 - 79 include a series
`
`of photographs of the product. Labels on the product state that the product was “Designed by
`
`Google” and “Made in China.” Exhibit 77.
`
`B.
`
`Samsung Respondents
`
`106. On information and belief, the Samsung Respondents import, sell for importation,
`
`and/or sell within the United States after importation, the Samsung Accused Products, including
`
`the representative Samsung Galaxy S22+, that infringe the Asserted Patents.
`
`107. The specific instances set forth below are representative examples of the Samsung
`
`Respondents’ unlawful importation, sale for importation, and/or sale within the United States after
`
`importation of infringing products.
`
`108. Prior to filing the Complaint, representatives for Complainants purchased the
`
`representative Accused Products in the United States. Exhibit 80 includes a copy of the receipt
`
`for purchase in the United States of a representative product and Exhibits 81-82 include a series
`
`42
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 9 of 15 PageID #: 1175
`
`of photographs of the product. Labels on the product state that the product was “Made in
`
`Vietnam.” Exhibit 81.
`
`C.
`
`OnePlus
`
`109. On information and belief, OnePlus imports, sells for importation, and/or sells
`
`within the United States after importation, the OnePlus Accused Products, including the
`
`representative OnePlus 8T, that infringe the Asserted Patents.
`
`110. The specific instances set forth below are representative examples of OnePlus’
`
`unlawful importation, sale for importation, and/or sale within the United States after importation
`
`of infringing products.
`
`111. Prior to filing the Complaint, representatives for Complainants purchased the
`
`representative Accused Products in the United States. Exhibit 83 includes a copy of the receipt
`
`for purchase in the United States of a representative product and Exhibits 84 – 88 include a series
`
`of photographs of the product. Labels on the product state that the product was “Designed by
`
`OnePlus” and “Made in China” and “Assembled in China.” Exhibits 84 – 86.
`
`D.
`
`TCL Respondents
`
`112. On information and belief, the TCL Respondents import, sell for importation,
`
`and/or sell within the United States after importation, the TCL Accused Products, including the
`
`representative TCL 10L, that infringe the Asserted Patents.
`
`113. The specific instances set forth below are representative examples of the TCL
`
`Respondents’ unlawful importation, sale for importation, and/or sale within the United States after
`
`importation of infringing products.
`
`114. Prior to filing the Complaint, representatives for Complainants purchased the
`
`representative Accused Products in the United States. Exhibits 89 include a copy of the receipt
`
`for purchase in the United States of a representative product and Exhibits 90 – 94 include a series
`
`43
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 10 of 15 PageID #:
`1176
`
`B.
`
`Samsung Respondents
`
`149. On information and belief, Samsung imports, sells for importation, and/or sells
`
`within the United States after importation certain Accused Products (the “Samsung Accused
`
`Products”), such as the Samsung Galaxy S22+ smartphone, that directly infringe, literally and/or
`
`under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claims 2, 10-13 of the ’970 Patent, claims 1, 3, 5-10, 16,
`
`19, 25, 38, 40, 54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, and 84 of the ’838 Patent, claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25,
`
`28, 31, and 35 of the ’251 Patent, claims 1, 8, 34, 35, 41, and 68 of the ’829 Patent, and claims 14,
`
`36, 37, and 38 of the ’123 Patent (the “Asserted Claims”) in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and
`
`Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i). The Samsung Accused Products satisfy all claim limitations of the
`
`Asserted Claims at the time of importation into the United States.
`
`150.
`
`In addition to the Samsung Galaxy S22+, the Samsung Accused Products also
`
`include, but are not limited to the following products: Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition, Galaxy XCover
`
`FieldPro, Galaxy XCover Pro, GT-I7500 Galaxy, i5700 Galaxy Spica, Galaxy S, Galaxy SL,
`
`Galaxy S II, Galaxy S Advance, Galaxy S III, Galaxy S Duos, Galaxy S III Mini, Galaxy S II Plus,
`
`Galaxy S4, Galaxy S4 Active, Galaxy S4 Mini, Galaxy S4 Zoom, Galaxy S Duos 2, Galaxy S III
`
`Slim, Galaxy S5, Galaxy S III Neo, Galaxy S5 Active, Galaxy S5 Mini, Galaxy S Duos 3, Galaxy
`
`S5 Plus, Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge, Galaxy S5 Neo, Galaxy S6 Active, Galaxy S6 Edge+, Galaxy
`
`S7, Galaxy S7 Edge, Galaxy S7 Active, Galaxy S8, Galaxy S8+, Galaxy S8 Active, Galaxy S9,
`
`Galaxy S9+, Galaxy S10e, Galaxy S10, Galaxy S10+, Galaxy S10 5G, Galaxy S21, Galaxy S20
`
`FE, Galaxy Alpha, Galaxy A3, Galaxy A5, Galaxy A7, Galaxy A8, Galaxy A3, Galaxy A5, Galaxy
`
`A7, Galaxy A8, Galaxy A8+, Galaxy A6, Galaxy A6+, Galaxy A8 Star, Galaxy A7, Galaxy A9,
`
`Galaxy A6s, Galaxy A8s, Galaxy A30, Galaxy A50, Galaxy A10, Galaxy A20, Galaxy A40,
`
`Galaxy A70, Galaxy A20e, Galaxy A80, Galaxy A40s, Galaxy A60, Galaxy A10s, Galaxy A20s,
`
`Galaxy A10e, Galaxy C5, Galaxy C7, Galaxy C9, Galaxy C9 Pro, Galaxy C7 Pro, Galaxy C5, Pro,
`
`53
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 11 of 15 PageID #:
`1177
`
`Galaxy C8, Galaxy J, Galaxy J1, Galaxy J5, Galaxy J7, Galaxy J2, Galaxy J1 Ace, Galaxy J1 Nxt,
`
`Galaxy J1 Mini, Galaxy J5 (2016), Galaxy J3 Pro, Galaxy J7, Galaxy J Max, Galaxy J1 Ace Neo,
`
`Galaxy J1 (2016), Galaxy J5 Prime, Galaxy J7, Prime, Galaxy J1 Mini Prime, Galaxy J2 Prime,
`
`Galaxy J3 Emerge, Galaxy J7 V, Galaxy J3 Prime, Galaxy J7 Pro, Galaxy J7 Max, Galaxy J7 Nxt,
`
`Galaxy J3 Luna Pro, Galaxy J7 Sky Pro, Galaxy J7+, Galaxy J2 Pro, Galaxy J7 Prime 2, Galaxy
`
`J7 Duo, Galaxy J4, Galaxy J6, Galaxy J3 (2018), Galaxy J7 (2018), Galaxy J2 Core, Galaxy J4+,
`
`Galaxy J6+, Galaxy J4 Core, Galaxy M, Galaxy M10, Galaxy M20, Galaxy M30, Galaxy M40,
`
`Galaxy E5, Galaxy E7, Galaxy Grand, Galaxy Core, Galaxy Core Plus, Galaxy Grand 2, Galaxy
`
`Grand Neo, Galaxy Core Prime, Galaxy Grand Prime Plus, Galaxy Grand Prime Pro, Galaxy Mega
`
`5.8, Galaxy Mega 6.3, Galaxy Mega 2, Galaxy Mini, Galaxy Mini 2, Galaxy Trend, Galaxy Trend
`
`Lite, Galaxy Trend Plus, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Ace Plus, Galaxy Ace 2, Galaxy Ace 3, Galaxy Ace
`
`Style, Galaxy Ace 4, Galaxy On7, Galaxy On5, Galaxy On5 Pro, Galaxy On7 Pro, Galaxy On8,
`
`Galaxy On Nxt, Galaxy On Max, Galaxy On7 Prime, Galaxy On6, Galaxy On8 (2018), Galaxy R,
`
`Galaxy R Style, Galaxy Y, Galaxy Y Duos, Galaxy Young, Galaxy Young 2, Galaxy Pocket,
`
`Galaxy Pocket Plus, Galaxy Pocket Neo, Galaxy Pocket Duos, Galaxy Pocket 2, Galaxy U, Galaxy
`
`Neo, Galaxy Pro, Galaxy Precedent, Galaxy Z, Galaxy Rush, Galaxy 5, Galaxy W, Galaxy Fit,
`
`Galaxy Gio, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Discover, Galaxy Reverb, Galaxy Stellar,
`
`Galaxy Appeal, Galaxy Express, Galaxy Express 2, Galaxy Fame, Galaxy Star, Galaxy Win,
`
`Galaxy Win Pro, Galaxy Star Pro, Galaxy Fame Lite, Galaxy Round, Galaxy Light, Galaxy V,
`
`Galaxy V Plus, Galaxy V2, Galaxy K Zoom, Galaxy Folder, Galaxy Active Neo, Galaxy Folder
`
`2, Galaxy Fold, Galaxy Note, Galaxy Note II, Galaxy Note 3, Galaxy Note 4, Galaxy Note Edge,
`
`Galaxy Note 5, Galaxy Note 7, Galaxy Note Fan Edition, Galaxy Note 8, Galaxy Note 9, Galaxy
`
`Note 10, Galaxy Note 10+, Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, Galaxy Tab, Galaxy Tab 7.0, Galaxy Tab 10.1,
`
`54
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 12 of 15 PageID #:
`1178
`
`Galaxy Tab 10.1N, Galaxy Tab 10.1v, Galaxy Tab 8.9, Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus, Galaxy Tab 7.7,
`
`Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, Galaxy Tab 3 7.0, Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0, Galaxy Tab 3 8.0,
`
`Galaxy Tab 3 10.1, Galaxy Tab 4 7.0, Galaxy Tab 4 8.0, Galaxy Tab 4 10.1, Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4,
`
`Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2, Galaxy Tab S 8.4, Galaxy Tab S 10.5, Galaxy Tab S2
`
`8.0, Galaxy Tab S2 9.7, Galaxy Tab S3 9.7, Galaxy Tab S4 10.5, Galaxy Tab E 8, Galaxy Tab E
`
`9.6, Galaxy Tab A 8.0, Galaxy Tab A 9.7, Galaxy Tab A 6.0, Galaxy Tab A 7.0, Galaxy Tab A
`
`10.1, Galaxy Tab A 10.5, Galaxy Tab Pro S 12.0, Galaxy Book 10.6, Galaxy Book 12.0, Galaxy
`
`Tab Active, Galaxy Tab Active 2, Galaxy View, Galaxy Note 8.0, Galaxy Note 10, Galaxy Note
`
`10.1, Galaxy Note Pro 12.2, Galaxy Gear, Gear Sport, Gear S3 Frontier, Galaxy Watch, Galaxy
`
`Watch Active, and Galaxy Watch Active 2.
`
`151. Samsung also knowingly and intentionally induces infringement of the Asserted
`
`Claims in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) and Section 337(a)(1)(B)(ii). Before the filing and
`
`service of this Complaint, and the filing and service of the related District Court complaint in the
`
`case captioned, AGIS Software Dev. LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 2:19-cv-00362-JRG
`
`(E.D. Tex.), Samsung has had knowledge of the Asserted Patents and the infringing nature of the
`
`Samsung Accused Products, or has remained willfully blind to their infringement. Samsung
`
`engaged in correspondence with AGIS, Inc., and the infringing nature of the Samsung Accused
`
`Products. Despite this knowledge, Samsung continues to actively encourage and instruct its
`
`customers and end users (for example, through its marketing, user manuals, and online instruction
`
`materials on its website) to use the Samsung Accused Products in ways that directly infringe the
`
`Asserted Claims literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents. Samsung does so knowing and
`
`intending that their customers and end users will commit these infringing acts. Samsung also
`
`continues to import, sell for importation, and/or sell in the United States the Samsung Accused
`
`55
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 13 of 15 PageID #:
`1179
`
`Products, despite its knowledge of the Asserted Patents, thereby specifically intending for and
`
`inducing its customers to infringe the Asserted Patents through the customers’ normal and
`
`customary use of the Samsung Accused Products.
`
`152. Samsung also contributorily infringes the Asserted Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(c) by selling or offering to sell within the United States or importing into the United States
`
`mobile devices, computers, and components thereof that incorporate or constitute a material part
`
`of the inventions claimed by the Asserted Patents. Samsung incorporates location sharing and
`
`communication technology into the Samsung Accused Products and sells them with those
`
`components pre-installed. Samsung does so knowing that these components are especially made
`
`or especially adapted for uses that infringe the Asserted Patents, and not staple articles or
`
`commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`153. Samsung is not licensed to any of the Asserted AGIS Patents.
`
`154. Claim charts comparing the Asserted Claims of the Asserted Patents to a
`
`representative Samsung Accused Product, the Samsung Galaxy S22+, and including photographs
`
`and drawings where applicable, are attached as Exhibit 11-15.
`
`C.
`
`OnePlus
`
`155. On information and belief, OnePlus imports, sells for importation, and/or sells
`
`within the United States after importation certain Accused Products (the “OnePlus Accused
`
`Products”), such as the OnePlus 8T smartphone, that directly infringe, literally and/or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, at least claims 2, 10-13 of the ’970 Patent, claims 1, 3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25,
`
`38, 40, 54-56, 61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80, and 84 of the ’838 Patent, claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28, 31,
`
`and 35 of the ’251 Patent, claims 1, 8, 34, 35, 41, and 68 of the ’829 Patent, and claims 14, 36, 37,
`
`and 38 of the ’123 Patent (the “Asserted Claims”) in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Section
`
`56
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 14 of 15 PageID #:
`1180
`
`(f) grant all such other and further relief as is appropriate under the law, based
`
`upon the facts complained of herein and as determined by the investigation.
`
`Dated: November 16, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Evan H. Langdon
`FABRICANT LLP
`1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 300
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (646) 797-4277
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`Peter Lambrianakos
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`Justine Minseon Park
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206
`South Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (646) 797-4277
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`Matthew D. Aichele
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`800 Maine Ave. SW, Suite 200
`Washington, DC 20024
`Telephone: (202) 664-0623
`E-mail: maichele@raklaw.com
`
`Counsel for Complainants AGIS Software
`Development LLC and Advanced Ground
`Information Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`85
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 40-2 Filed 12/27/22 Page 15 of 15 PageID #:
`1181
`
`UNITED ST ATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of:
`
`CERT AIN LOCATION-SHARING
`SYSTEMS, RELATED SOFTWARE,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`Investigation No. 337-T A-__
`
`VERIFICATION TO COMPLAINT
`
`I, Malcolm K. Beyer, Jr., declare, in accordance with 19 C.F .R. §§ 210.4 and 21 0.12( a) as follows:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`I am Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. and
`AGIS Software Development LLC and am duly authorized to sign this Complaint;
`
`I have read the Complaint and I am aware of its contents;
`
`The Complaint is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to
`cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;
`
`To the best of my knowledge, information, and belief founded upon reasonable inquiry,
`the claims and legal contentions of the Complaint are warranted by existing law or a
`non-frivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or
`the establishment of new law; and
`
`The allegations and other factual contentions made in the Complaint have evidentiary
`support or are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for
`further investigation or discovery.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on November 15,2022 in
`Jupiter, Florida
`
`~m:~j
`
`Chief Executive Officer
`Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc.
`and AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`