Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 163-3 Filed 12/19/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:
`16190
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 163-3 Filed 12/19/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:
`
`16191
`
`DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
`dsnyder@omm.com
`LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526)
`lsimmons@omm.com
`DAVID S. ALMELING (S.B. #235449)
`dalmeling@omm.com
`MARK LIANG (S.B. #278487)
`mliang@omm.com
`BILL TRAC (S.B. #281437)
`btrac@omm.com
`AMY K. LIANG (S.B. #291910)
`aliang@omm.com
`SORIN G. ZAHARIA (S.B. #312655)
`szaharia@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Fl.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone:
`(415) 984-8700
`Facsimile:
`(415) 984-8701
`
`
`
`v.
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`WAZE MOBILE LTD.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`STACY YAE (S.B. #315663)
`syae@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`400 South Hope St., 18th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone:
`(213) 430-6000
`Facsimile:
`(213) 430-6407
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC and
`Waze Mobile Ltd.
`
`
`Case No. 5:22-cv-04826-BLF
`(Consolidated case)
`DEFENDANTS’ PATENT L.R. 4-2
`DISCLOSURE OF PRELIMINARY
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`AND EVIDENCE
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`Complaint Filed: November 4, 2019
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 163-3 Filed 12/19/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:
`
`16192
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation and Order Regarding Deadlines for Supplemental
`Markman Proceedings (ECF 484) and Patent Local Rule 4-2, Defendants Google LLC (“Google”)
`and Waze Mobile Ltd. (“Waze”) (collectively, “Defendants”) provide their preliminary claim
`constructions and evidence. Pursuant to the Court’s instruction at the November 6, 2023 Further
`Case Management Conference (ECF 478), Defendants address the meaning of two phrases:
`(i) the claim term, “remote control,” recited in all claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,749,829
`(“’829 Patent”); and
`(ii) the word, “participants,” within the agreed construction of the claim term “group,”
`which is “more than two participants associated together,” where “group” is recited in all claims of
`the ’829 Patent and U.S. Patent No. 9,820,123 (“’123 Patent”).
`I. DEFENDANTS’ PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTIONS AND EVIDENCE
`
`
`No.
`1.
`
`Claim Term1
`“participants” within
`the agreed
`construction of
`“group,” which is
`“more than two
`participants
`associated together”
`
`(’829 Patent, all
`asserted claims;2 ’123
`Patent, all asserted
`claims3)
`
`Defendants’ Proposed Construction and Evidence
`“participants” means “users of devices,” such that the
`construction of “group” is “more than two users of devices
`associated together”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’829 Patent4 at 7:9-12, 7:18-20, 1:47-51, 4:36-40, 5:7-
`•
`12, 6:62-66, 9:54-57, 14:20-21, 7:43-46.
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`• December 22, 2020 Joseph McAlexander III
`Deposition Tr. at 88:25-89:4;
`• AGIS Software Development LLC v. Huawei Device
`USA Inc., et al., 2:17-cv-513 (E.D. Tex.), ECF 165
`
`
`1 For all claim terms, Google reserves the right to rely on sections of evidence cited by Plaintiff
`AGIS Software Development (“AGIS”).
`2 The ’829 Patent claims asserted against Google and Waze are:
`• Google: claims 8, 20, 27, 34, 41, and 60;
`• Waze: claims 1, 4, 16, 20, 24, 27, 32, 34, 38, 41, 45, 50, 60, and 67.
`3 On October 10, 2023, the Court issued an order holding that Google does not infringe the ’123
`Patent. ECF 470. The construction of the term “participants” in the ’123 Patent is thus only
`relevant to AGIS’s case against Waze. The ’123 Patent claims asserted against Waze are claims 1,
`7, 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 34, 36, 37, 41, 46, and 48.
`4 The ’829 Patent shares a common specification with the ’123 Patent; thus, citations to the ’829
`Patent specification should be understood to include the same citations to the ’123 Patent
`specification.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 163-3 Filed 12/19/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:
`
`16193
`
`(Plaintiff AGIS Software Development, LLC’s
`Opening Claim Construction Brief) at 2;
`• U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 at cl. 2, 3:56-67, 5:45-47,
`5:54-57, 5:26-27, 6:13-16, 1:15-17, 1:51-53, 1:58-60,
`3:25-27;
`• New Oxford Am. Dict. (3rd ed. 2010) at 1277;
`• Cambridge Dict. of Am. English (2nd ed. 2008) at 624;
`• House Webster’s College Dict. (Updated ed. 2005) at
`896;
`• Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dict. (2003) at 904.
`“control of another device to perform a selected action without
`any action by that other device’s operator,” where the
`“selected action” cannot be sharing device location
`information
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’829 Patent File History, Reply to November 2, 2016
`•
`Office Action at 16-17;
`’829 Patent File History, Reply to March 6, 2017
`Office Action at 18-20;
`• U.S. Patent No. 7,630,724 at 2:48-3:20, Fig. 3, 9:25-30;
`• U.S. Patent No. 7,031,728 at 2:43-52, 2:5-17, 6:61-67,
`Fig. 3, 3:13-17, 5:55-6:4, 9:52-57, 10:7-11, 11:43-64,
`claims 1 and 2.
`
`•
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`• Collins Dict. of Electronics (2007) at 351;
`• Dict. of Computing (6th ed. 2010) at 283;
`• Chambers Dict. of Science and Tech. (2007) at 1018;
`• Dict. of Science and Tech. (2nd ed. 2003) at 518;
`• Oxford Dict. of English (3rd ed. 2010) at 1503;
`• Collins Dict. (10th ed. 2009) at 1389;
`• Macmillan English Dict. for Advanced Learners (2nd
`ed. 2007) at 323;
`• The Chambers Dict. (13th ed. 2016) at 339;
`• Longman Dict. of American English (5th ed. 2014) at
`244;
`• Webster’s College Dict. (2005) at 269.
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`2.
`
`“remote control”
`
`(’829 Patent, all
`asserted claims)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 163-3 Filed 12/19/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:
`
`16194
`
`Dated: December 15, 2023
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Mark Liang
`
`
`DARIN W. SNYDER
`LUANN L. SIMMONS
`DAVID S. ALMELING
`MARK LIANG
`BILL TRAC
`AMY K. LIANG
`SORIN G. ZAHARIA
`STACY YAE
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`
`Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE
`LLC and WAZE MOBILE LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`