throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 127-2 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:
`10494
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 433 Filed 03/31/23 Page 1 of 5Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 127-2 Filed 09/12/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:
`
`
`10495
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Enrique Iturralde (pro hac vice)
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Road, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Benjamin T. Wang (CA SBN 228712)
`bwang@raklaw.com
`Minna Y. Chan (CA SBN 305941)
`mchan@raklaw.com
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile: (310) 826-9226
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff AGIS Software
`Development LLC
`
`DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
`dsnyder@omm.com
`LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526)
`lsimmons@omm.com
`DAVID S. ALMELING (S.B. #235449)
`dalmeling@omm.com
`MARK LIANG (S.B. #278487)
`mliang@omm.com
`BILL TRAC (S.B. #281437)
`btrac@omm.com
`AMY K. LIANG (S.B. #291910)
`aliang@omm.com
`SORIN G. ZAHARIA (S.B. #312655)
`szaharia@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Fl.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone:
`(415) 984-8700
`Facsimile:
`(415) 984-8701
`
`STACY YAE (S.B. #315663)
`syae@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`400 South Hope St., 18th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone:
`(213) 430-6000
`Facsimile:
`(213) 430-6407
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC and
`Waze Mobile Ltd.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`WAZE MOBILE LTD.,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:22-cv-04826-BLF
`(Consolidated case)
`JOINT STIPULATION AND
`[PROPOSED] CASE SCHEDULE
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`Complaint Filed: November 4, 2019
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 433 Filed 03/31/23 Page 2 of 5Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 127-2 Filed 09/12/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:
`
`
`10496
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development (“AGIS”) and Defendants Google LLC (“Google”)
`and Waze Mobile Ltd. (“Waze”) (collectively, “the parties”) submit this Joint Stipulation and
`Proposed Case Schedule pursuant to the Court’s Case Management Order (ECF No. 424).
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, subject to the
`Court’s approval, that the following case schedule applies:1
`
`
`Scheduled Event
`Plaintiff’s Patent L. R. 3-1, 3-2
`Disclosures2
`Defendants’ Consolidated Summary
`Judgment Motion3
`
`Deadline
`March 15, 2023
`
`April 3, 2023
`
`
`1 The parties have not proposed deadlines for claim construction disclosures under Patent L. R. 4,
`as the Court stated it plans to follow the claim constructions ordered in E.D. Tex. ECF No. 420,
`429.
`2 AGIS has agreed to dismiss with prejudice its allegations for the original claims of U.S. Patent
`No. 8,213,970 (“’970 Patent”) from this case. Accordingly, the parties will not address the ’970
`Patent in their Patent L.R. disclosures. For example, Google will not address the ’970 Patent in its
`Patent L.R. 3-3 invalidity contentions. Further, because the parties completed fact discovery,
`including document productions, while this case was pending in E.D. Tex., the parties’ respective
`Patent L.R. 3-2 and 3-4 production deadlines apply only to any required supplementation to their
`existing productions.
`3 In accordance with the Court’s statements during the March 1, 2023 initial case management
`conference, the parties will meet and confer after the filing of Defendants’ Consolidated Summary
`Judgment Motion to determine the deadlines for (1) the opposition and reply briefing to the
`Summary Judgment Motion and (2) any needed supplementation of expert reports proposed by
`AGIS responsive to the Summary Judgment Motion. [Defendants do not believe that any
`supplementation of expert reports is required in response to Defendants’ Consolidated Summary
`Judgment Motion because the parties completed expert discovery, but Defendants are willing to
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 433 Filed 03/31/23 Page 3 of 5Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 127-2 Filed 09/12/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:
`
`
`10497
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Scheduled Event
`Deadline to Amend Pleadings or Join
`Parties
`Defendants’ Patent L.R. 3-3, 3-4
`Disclosures
`Joint Case Management Statement For
`Second Case Management Conference
`Second Case Management Conference
`Plaintiff’s Patent L.R. 3-8 Damages
`Contentions
`Defendants’ Patent L. R. 3-9 Responsive
`Damages Contentions
`Technology / Claims Tutorial
`ADR Deadline (ECF No. 427)
`Hearing on Defendants’ Consolidated
`Summary Judgment Motion
`Close of Supplemental Fact Discovery4
`Advice of Counsel (Patent L.R. 3-7)
`Supplemental Opening Expert Reports by
`the parties on issues where they bear the
`burden of proof
`Supplemental Rebuttal Expert Reports
`Close of Supplemental Expert Discovery
`Final Day for Filing Dispositive Motions
`Oppositions to Dispositive Motions
`
`Deadline
`May 1, 2023
`
`May 1, 2023
`
`June 1, 2023
`
`June 8, 2023
`June 20, 2023
`
`July 20, 2023
`
`9:00am PT, August 11, 2023 (in person)
`September 1, 2023
`September 7, 2023
`
`September 11, 2024
`September 15, 2024
`October 2, 2024
`
`November 20, 2024
`December 18, 2024
`January 22, 2025
`February 26, 2025
`
`
`meet and confer about any supplementation proposed by AGIS.] Consistent with the Court’s
`statements, the proposed schedule shall complete all briefing by no later than August 7, 2023.
`4 The parties have proposed dates for fact and expert discovery. But because the parties completed
`fact and expert discovery in the Eastern District of Texas before this case was transferred to this
`District, any further discovery in this case will not go beyond any required supplementations of
`document productions, discovery responses, Patent L.R. disclosures, and expert reports. The
`parties will meet and confer regarding the scope of any additional supplemental fact and expert
`discovery.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 433 Filed 03/31/23 Page 4 of 5Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 127-2 Filed 09/12/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:
`
`
`10498
`
`Deadline
`March 20, 2025
`April 3, 2025
`July 17, 2025
`August 18, 2025
`
`Scheduled Event
`Replies to Dispositive Motions
`Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions
`Final Pretrial Conference
`Trial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 433 Filed 03/31/23 Page 5 of 5Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 127-2 Filed 09/12/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:
`
`
`10499
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Mark Liang
`
`
`DARIN W. SNYDER
`LUANN L. SIMMONS
`DAVID S. ALMELING
`MARK LIANG
`BILL TRAC
`AMY K. LIANG
`SORIN G. ZAHARIA
`STACY YAE
`ANDREW BLEDSOE
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`
`Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE
`LLC and WAZE MOBILE LTD.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 31, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Benjamin T. Wang
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Enrique Iturralde (pro hac vice)
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Road, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Benjamin T. Wang (CA SBN 228712)
`bwang@raklaw.com
`Minna Y. Chan (CA SBN 305941)
`mchan@raklaw.com
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile (310) 826-9226
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff AGIS Software
`Development LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`The undersigned attests that concurrence in the filing of the foregoing stipulation was
`
`obtained from all of its signatories.
`
`DATED: March 31, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Benjamin T. Wang
`Benjamin T. Wang
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket