Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 123-7 Filed 09/07/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:
`10141
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`
`10141
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 437 Filed 04/07/23 Page 1 of 4Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 123-7 Filed 09/07/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:
`
`
`10142
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Enrique Iturralde (pro hac vice)
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Road, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Benjamin T. Wang (CA SBN 228712)
`bwang@raklaw.com
`Minna Y. Chan (CA SBN 305941)
`mchan@raklaw.com
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile: (310) 826-9226
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff AGIS Software
`Development LLC
`
`Darin W. Snyder (S.B. #136003)
`dsnyder@omm.com
`Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526)
`lsimmons@omm.com
`David S. Almeling (S.B. #235449)
`dalmeling@omm.com
`Mark Liang (S.B. #278487)
`mliang@omm.com
`Bill Trac (S.B. #281437)
`btrac@omm.com
`Amy K. Liang (S.B. #291910)
`aliang@omm.com
`Sorin G. Zaharia (S.B. #312655)
`szaharia@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Fl.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone:
`(415) 984-8700
`Facsimile:
`(415) 984-8701
`
`Stacy Yae (S.B. #315663)
`syae@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`400 South Hope St., 18th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone:
`(213) 430-6000
`Facsimile:
`(213) 430-6407
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Google LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`
`Case No. 5:22-cv-04826-BLF
`(Consolidated case)
`
`JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION
`FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS 2 AND
`10-13 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,213,970
`AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`WAZE MOBILE LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION FOR
`DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RELATING TO
`U.S. PATENT No. 8,213,970
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:22-cv-04826-BLF
`
`
`
`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 437 Filed 04/07/23 Page 2 of 4Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 123-7 Filed 09/07/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:
`
`
`10143
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (a)(1)(B) and Civ. L.R. 7-12,
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”) and Defendant Google LLC (“Google”), by
`and through their counsel, hereby stipulate to, and jointly move for, an order dismissing with
`prejudice all claims that AGIS raised or could have raised relating to asserted claims1 2 and 10-13
`of U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”). All claims and defenses that Google raised
`relating to the same claims of the ’970 Patent are dismissed without prejudice.
`Each Party shall bear its own fees and costs incurred as to the claims and defenses dismissed
`under this stipulation relating to claims 2 and 10-13 of the ’970 Patent.
`A proposed order for dismissal of the ’970 Patent according to the terms above is attached
`to this stipulation and joint motion.
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`1 The Parties agree that this stipulation and motion to dismiss concern the asserted claims of the
`’970 Patent that issued on July 3, 2012. This dismissal does not cover the reexamination-amended
`claims of the ’970 Patent that issued on December 9, 2021 and that are not asserted in this action.
`JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION FOR
`DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RELATING TO
`U.S. PATENT No. 8,213,970
`
`
`
`1
`
`CASE NO. 5:22-cv-04826-BLF
`
`
`
`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 437 Filed 04/07/23 Page 3 of 4Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 123-7 Filed 09/07/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:
`
`
`10144
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`DATED: April 7, 2023
`/s/ Benjamin T. Wang /s/ Mark Liang
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`
`
`DARIN W. SNYDER
`ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`LUANN L. SIMMONS
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`
`
`DAVID S. ALMELING
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`MARK LIANG
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`
`BILL TRAC
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`
`AMY K. LIANG
`Enrique Iturralde (pro hac vice)
`
`
`SORIN G. ZAHARIA
`eiturralde@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`STACY YAE
`FABRICANT LLP
`
`
`
`
`ANDREW BLEDSOE
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Road, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Benjamin T. Wang (CA SBN 228712)
`bwang@raklaw.com
`Minna Y. Chan (CA SBN 305941)
`mchan@raklaw.com
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile (310) 826-9226
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Google LLC
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`
`
`
`The undersigned attests that concurrence in the filing of the foregoing stipulation was
`
`obtained from all of its signatories.
`DATED: April 7, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Benjamin T. Wang
` Benjamin T. Wang
`
`JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION FOR
`DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RELATING TO
`U.S. PATENT No. 8,213,970
`
`
`
`2
`
`CASE NO. 5:22-cv-04826-BLF
`
`
`
`Case 5:22-cv-04826-BLF Document 437 Filed 04/07/23 Page 4 of 4Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 123-7 Filed 09/07/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:
`
`
`10145
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ORDER
`Having considered the Joint Motion and Stipulation For Dismissal Of Claims 2 And 9-13
`Of U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 (“’970 Patent”) asserted by Plaintiff AGIS Software Development
`LLC (“AGIS”) against Defendant Google LLC (“Google”), the Court GRANTS the motion in its
`entirety.
`All claims that AGIS raised or could have raised relating to asserted claims1 2 and 10-13 of
`the ’970 Patent are dismissed with prejudice. All claims and defenses that Google raised relating
`to the same claims of the ’970 Patent are dismissed without prejudice. Each Party shall bear its
`own fees and costs incurred as to the claims and defenses hereby dismissed relating to claims 2 and
`10-13 of the ’970 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`DATED: _______________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`The Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Judge
`
`
`1 This order of dismissal concerns the asserted claims of the ’970 Patent that issued on July 3, 2012.
`
`This dismissal does not cover the reexamination-amended claims of the ’970 Patent that issued on
`
`December 9, 2021 and that are not asserted in this action.
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION FOR
`DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RELATING TO
`U.S. PATENT No. 8,213,970
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:22-cv-04826-BLF
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
