throbber
Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 105-3 Filed 08/17/23 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7917
`Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 105-3 Filed 08/17/23 Page 1of 7 PagelD #: 7917
`
`EXHIBIT 20
`EXHIBIT 20
`
`

`

`
`Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 28-18 Filed 02/20/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 407Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 105-3 Filed 08/17/23 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 7918
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`WAZE MOBILE LIMITED,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-00359-JRG
`
`Filed Under Seal
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-00361-JRG
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-00362-JRG
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF SHANNON SHAPER
`
`
`
`

`

`
`Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 28-18 Filed 02/20/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 408Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 105-3 Filed 08/17/23 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 7919
`
`
`I, Shannon Shaper, state and declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a People Analytics Manager at Google LLC (“Google”). I have been a Google employee
`
`since 2007. I work in Mountain View, California.
`
`2.
`
`I submit this declaration on my knowledge of the corporate structure of Google and Waze
`
`Mobile Limited (“Waze”), and my investigation into facts relating to multiple complaints that I
`
`understand were filed on November 4, 2019 by Plaintiff AGIS Software Development
`
`(“AGIS”) against Google, Waze, and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc. (“Samsung”).
`
`3.
`
`I understand that the applications that may be at issue in the above-captioned cases against
`
`Google and Samsung are Google Maps for Mobile (“GMM”), Find My Device, Google
`
`Hangouts, Google Plus, Android Messenger, and Google Messages. I am aware of no Google
`
`product named Android Messenger or Google Messages, but I am aware of a Google product
`
`named Messages. For purposes of my investigation, I have investigated the location of
`
`witnesses and evidence related to GMM, Find My Device, Messages, Google Hangouts,
`
`Google Plus (collectively “Accused Google Applications”), and the Waze mobile application.
`
`4. Google’s predecessor, Google Inc., was incorporated in Delaware. Google has since converted
`
`to an LLC, but remains registered in Delaware.
`
`5. Google has been headquartered in Northern California since its founding in 1998. It has been
`
`headquartered in Mountain View, California since 2003. In 2007, Google opened its first
`
`office in San Francisco, California.
`
`6. Google’s Mountain View headquarters, which includes offices in neighboring Sunnyvale
`
`(collectively referred to as Mountain View herein), is the strategic center of Google’s business.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 28-18 Filed 02/20/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 409Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 105-3 Filed 08/17/23 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 7920
`
`
`Google’s Mountain View headquarters and its other offices in Northern California (including
`
`its San Francisco and San Bruno offices) house thousands of employees making up over 40%
`
`of Google’s total worldwide employees, including engineers, product managers, executives,
`
`and staff, particularly those performing work related to the Accused Google Applications and
`
`the Waze mobile application.
`
`7. Many decisions related to Google’s overall business, including the most significant design and
`
`engineering decisions related to the Accused Google Applications, involve managers and leads
`
`who work in Mountain View, California.
`
`8. According to Google’s investigation, most engineers and managers with relevant knowledge
`
`regarding GMM are based in or around Mountain View, California, including those responsible
`
`for Location Sharing. In particular, I have been informed and understand that at least the
`
`following individuals have knowledge regarding the design, development, and operation of
`
`Location Sharing in GMM used on Android mobile devices:
`
`●
`
`●
`
`California.
`
` based in Mountain View,
`
`
`
` his team of
`
`engineers working in the Mountain View, California office responsible for Google
`
`Location Sharing functionality.
`
`9. Additionally, according to Google’s investigation, the development of Find My Device was
`
`performed by engineers based in or around Mountain View, California, including
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` I have been informed and understand that, in
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 28-18 Filed 02/20/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 410Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 105-3 Filed 08/17/23 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 7921
`
`
`2019, responsibilities for maintaining Find My Device were transferred to a team in London,
`
`but that team’s development has not involved the introduction of significant new features. The
`
`team in London has collaborated with the engineers in Mountain View, California, who
`
`developed Find My Device and has focused on back-end migrations of Find My Device.
`
`
`
` continues to work on Find My Device and remains based in Mountain View,
`
`California.
`
`10. Additionally, according to Google’s investigation, engineers and managers with relevant
`
`knowledge regarding the Messages application are based in or around Mountain View,
`
`California. In particular, I have been informed and understand that
`
`
`
` is located in San Francisco, California, and manages a team of
`
`product managers based in Mountain View, San Francisco, and Kirkland, Washington.
`
`Engineers responsible for various features related to Messages are located in Google’s
`
`Mountain View, California, and Kirkland, Washington, offices.
`
`11. Additionally, according to Google’s investigation, engineers and managers with relevant
`
`knowledge regarding the Google Hangouts application are based in or around Mountain View,
`
`California. In particular, I have been informed and understand that
`
`
`
` on Android until November 2019 is located in Google’s
`
`Sunnyvale, California office. The team currently responsible for the development of Google
`
`Hangouts on Android is based in Sunnyvale, California.
`
`12. Additionally, according to Google’s investigation, engineers and managers with relevant
`
`knowledge regarding the Google Plus application are based in or around Mountain View,
`
`California. In particular, I have been informed and understand that
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 28-18 Filed 02/20/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 411Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 105-3 Filed 08/17/23 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 7922
`
`
`
`
` through the shutdown for consumer accounts in
`
`April 2019 and is located in Google’s Sunnyvale, California office.
`
`13. I am currently aware of no Google employees with relevant knowledge regarding the Accused
`
`Google Applications residing or working in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`14. Google acquired Waze in June 2013. As of that time, the Waze employees responsible for the
`
`Waze mobile application became Google employees. According to Google’s investigation, the
`
`employees responsible for the Waze mobile application are located primarily in Israel, New
`
`York, and Northern California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15. I am currently aware of no employees responsible for the Waze mobile application in Texas.
`
`16. As a matter of Google practice, documents in Google’s possession about its products and
`
`services are normally created and maintained by the employees working on those products and
`
`services. As discussed above, the employees with relevant knowledge of the Accused Google
`
`Applications are located primarily in or around Mountain View, California, and no such
`
`employees are in the Eastern District of Texas. Additionally, the employees with relevant
`
`knowledge of the Waze mobile application are located primarily in Israel, New York, and
`
`Northern California.
`
`17. Google and Waze do not maintain an office in the Eastern District of Texas, which I
`
`understand includes the counties identified on the Eastern District of Texas’ website
`
`(http://www.txed.uscourts.gov/court-locator). Accordingly, Google and Waze have no
`
`employees who work at any Google office in the Eastern District of Texas, including those
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 28-18 Filed 02/20/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 412Case 2:22-cv-00263-JRG-RSP Document 105-3 Filed 08/17/23 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 7923
`
`
`involved in the design, development or management of the Accused Google Applications or
`
`the Waze mobile application.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February ___,
`
`2020, in Mountain View, California.
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`Shannon Shaper
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket