`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
`CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A
`VERIZON WIRELESS, VERIZON
`ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, LLC,
`VERIZON BUSINESS GLOBAL LLC,
`VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK
`SERVICES, LLC, TERREMARK NORTH
`AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00185-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) With Prejudice (the
`
`“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”) and Defendants Verizon
`
`Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Enterprise Solutions,
`
`LLC, Verizon Business Global LLC, Verizon Business Network Services, LLC, and Terremark
`
`North America LLC (collectively, “Verizon”). (Dkt. No. 49.) In the Motion, the parties move for
`
`dismissal with prejudice of all claims asserted against Verizon by AGIS pursuant to a settlement
`
`agreement. (Id. at 1.)
`
`Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED.
`
`Accordingly, all claims asserted against Verizon by AGIS in the above-captioned case are
`
`DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00185-JRG Document 50 Filed 01/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 665
`
`fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are
`
`DENIED AS MOOT.
`
`The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims
`
`remain.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of January, 2023.
`
`