`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. ET
`AL.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO.,
`LTD.; ET AL.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CASE NO. 2:22-CV-00134-JRG-RSP
`
`ORDER
`
`Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss in Part filed by Plaintiffs Advanced Micro
`
`Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC and Defendants TCL Industries Holdings Co. Ltd., TCL
`
`Industries Holdings (H.K.) Co., Ltd., TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL Technology Group
`
`Corporation, TTE Corporation, TCL Holdings (BVI) Limited, TCL King Electrical Appliances
`
`(Huizhou) Co. Ltd., Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd., TCL MOKA International
`
`Limited, and TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd, Manufacturas Avanzadas SA de CV, TCL
`
`Electronics Mexico, S de RL de CV, and TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd. (collectively, “TCL
`
`Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 75.) In the Motion, the parties represent that the claims between them
`
`have been resolved and request dismissal of those claims with prejudice. (Id. at 1.)
`
`Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED.
`
`Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted between Plaintiffs and the TCL Defendants,
`
`only, in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear
`
`its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief between Plaintiffs and
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 77 Filed 04/24/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1436
`
`the TCL Defendants in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS
`
`MOOT.
`
`The Clerk of Court is directed to MAINTAIN AS OPEN the above-captioned case as
`
`additional defendants remain.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of April, 2024.
`
`