Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 45-1 Filed 08/12/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 737
`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 45-1 Filed 08/12/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 738
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Matt,
`
`Canavera, Kyle Ryan (SDO) <KCanavera@perkinscoie.com>
`Thursday, August 11, 2022 2:40 PM
`Karambelas, Matthew; Eric Findlay; Schnurer, John P. (SDO); *Perkins ServiceTCL-AMD-
`DCT
`De Renzis, Megan; Brian Craft; Rizk, Adam; Renaud, Michael; Davenport, Samuel; Debby
`Gunter; Sarah Hene
`RE: 2:22-cv-00134: E.D. Tex.
`
`TCL cannot agree at this time to be bound by the adjudication of the E.D. Tex. litigation with respect to Realtek or the
`adjudication of the ITC case.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Kyle
`
`Kyle R. Canavera
`D. +1.858.720.5782
`E. KCanavera@perkinscoie.com
`
`From: Karambelas, Matthew <MAKarambelas@mintz.com>
`Sent: 10 August, 2022 18:54
`To: Eric Findlay <efindlay@findlaycraft.com>; Canavera, Kyle Ryan (SDO) <KCanavera@perkinscoie.com>; Schnurer, John
`P. (SDO) <JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com>; *Perkins ServiceTCL‐AMD‐DCT <PerkinsServiceTCL‐AMD‐
`DCT@perkinscoie.com>
`Cc: De Renzis, Megan <MADeRenzis@mintz.com>; Brian Craft <bcraft@findlaycraft.com>; Rizk, Adam
`<ARizk@mintz.com>; Renaud, Michael <MTRenaud@mintz.com>; Davenport, Samuel <SFDavenport@mintz.com>;
`Debby Gunter <dgunter@findlaycraft.com>; Sarah Hene <shene@findlaycraft.com>
`Subject: RE: 2:22‐cv‐00134: E.D. Tex.
`
`Counsel for TCL,
`
`Please let us know your response on this as soon as possible.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Matt
`
`Matthew Karambelas
`Associate
`
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center, Boston, MA 02111
`+1.617.348.1831
`MAKarambelas@mintz.com | Mintz.com
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 45-1 Filed 08/12/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 739
`
`
`
`From: Karambelas, Matthew
`Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 8:19 PM
`To: 'Eric Findlay' <efindlay@findlaycraft.com>; Canavera, Kyle Ryan (SDO) <KCanavera@perkinscoie.com>; Schnurer,
`John P. (SDO) <JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com>; *Perkins ServiceTCL‐AMD‐DCT <PerkinsServiceTCL‐AMD‐
`DCT@perkinscoie.com>
`Cc: De Renzis, Megan <MADeRenzis@mintz.com>; Brian Craft <bcraft@findlaycraft.com>; Rizk, Adam
`<ARizk@mintz.com>; Renaud, Michael <MTRenaud@mintz.com>; Davenport, Samuel <SFDavenport@mintz.com>;
`Debby Gunter <dgunter@findlaycraft.com>; Sarah Hene <shene@findlaycraft.com>
`Subject: RE: 2:22‐cv‐00134: E.D. Tex.
`
`Counsel for TCL,
`
`
`Please confirm whether TCL agrees to be bound by all rulings in this E.D. Tex. case as the result of any adjudication
`against Realtek in this action, including but not limited to (i) validity, (ii) infringement rulings on Realtek chips as applying
`to TCL TVs containing those chips, and (iii) infringement rulings on GPUs that are subject of adjudication as applying to
`any TCL TVs containing the same GPU (whether incorporated in a Realtek chip or not). If TCL does not agree to be so
`bound by any adjudication against Realtek or subject GPUs in this action, and those rulings occur prior to the case here
`proceeding against TCL, please confirm whether TCL agrees not to receive or accept assistance by Realtek or its counsel
`in subsequently defending AMD’s claims against TCL in this E.D. Tex. case.
`
`
`Similarly, please confirm whether TCL agrees to be bound by all rulings in the ‐1318 ITC case, as applying to TCL in this
`E.D. Tex. action, for example, validity and infringement based upon the GPUs adjudicated in the ITC case.
`
`
`Best regards,
`
`
`Matt
`
`Matthew Karambelas
`Associate
`
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center, Boston, MA 02111
`+1.617.348.1831
`MAKarambelas@mintz.com | Mintz.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Eric Findlay <efindlay@findlaycraft.com>
`Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 1:52 PM
`To: Canavera, Kyle Ryan (SDO) <KCanavera@perkinscoie.com>; Schnurer, John P. (SDO) <JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com>;
`*Perkins ServiceTCL‐AMD‐DCT <PerkinsServiceTCL‐AMD‐DCT@perkinscoie.com>
`Cc: De Renzis, Megan <MADeRenzis@mintz.com>; Brian Craft <bcraft@findlaycraft.com>; Rizk, Adam
`<ARizk@mintz.com>; Renaud, Michael <MTRenaud@mintz.com>; Davenport, Samuel <SFDavenport@mintz.com>;
`Karambelas, Matthew <MAKarambelas@mintz.com>; Debby Gunter <dgunter@findlaycraft.com>; Sarah Hene
`<shene@findlaycraft.com>
`Subject: RE: 2:22‐cv‐00134: E.D. Tex.
`
`
`Hi Kyle,
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 45-1 Filed 08/12/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 740
`
`
`Given TCL’s motion for mandatory stay we understand that it is TCL’s position that the dates in the procedural
`schedule or in any dates in a proposed docket control order or discovery order would not apply to TCL. That
`said, please let us know whether you have any opposition to a motion to extend deadlines as to Realtek
`regarding a docket control order (currently set for 8/2) or proposed discovery order (including initial
`disclosures) until September 20, 2022, to allow the Court sufficient time to rule on the pending motions to
`stay. Please let us know as soon as possible if you would oppose or take a position.
`
`
`
`Best,
`
`Eric
`
`
`
`Eric H. Findlay
`Findlay Craft, P.C.
`102 N. College Avenue, Suite 900
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`(903) 534-1100 M: (903) 571-6963
`www.findlaycraft.com
`
`National Experience Local Expertise
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
