`
`Exhibit 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP Document 31-3 Filed 07/11/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 276
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Hi Eric,
`
`Benson, Robert <rbenson@orrick.com>
`Wednesday, July 6, 2022 10:42 AM
`Eric Findlay; Johnson, Jeffrey; Blake Thompson; Mark Mann
`Brian Craft
`RE: AMD v. TCL, Realtek, et al. (Case No. 22-cv-00134-JRG-RSP)
`
`Thank you for reaching out.
`
`Realtek does not consent to electronic service of the summons and Complaint.
`
`Realtek does not believe any further extensions are warranted with respect to upcoming contention deadlines.
`
`Best regards,
`Robert
`
`From: Eric Findlay <efindlay@findlaycraft.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2022 6:44 PM
`To: Benson, Robert <rbenson@orrick.com>; Johnson, Jeffrey <jj@orrick.com>; Blake Thompson
`<blake@themannfirm.com>; Mark Mann <mark@themannfirm.com>
`Cc: Brian Craft <bcraft@findlaycraft.com>
`Subject: RE: AMD v. TCL, Realtek, et al. (Case No. 22‐cv‐00134‐JRG‐RSP)
`
`Counsel,
`
`Pursuant to our discussion and email exchange last week, AMD believes a further extension is warranted in
`order to sync the initial disclosure date with the date TCL agreed with – July 26. Please let us know if you
`agree.
`
`In addition, please let us know whether or not Realtek would oppose a motion for service to be effective on
`Realtek based on email or any other means the Court deems appropriate. We think it makes sense to avoid
`unnecessary motions practice and for Realtek to accept electronic service, but please let me know.
`
`Best,
`Eric
`
`Eric H. Findlay
`Findlay Craft, P.C.
`102 N. College Avenue, Suite 900
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`(903) 534-1100 M: (903) 571-6963
`www.findlaycraft.com
`
`1
`
`