throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 90 Filed 07/28/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 6177
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00186-JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO STAY
`
` Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) and Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc. (“SEA”) (collectively, “Samsung”), respectfully request that the Court stay the above-
`
`captioned action pending resolution of Samsung’s Motion to Transfer Venue to The Northern
`
`District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 59).
`
`On July 27, 2022, Samsung’s Motion to Transfer Venue was completely briefed. The
`
`Federal Circuit has stated that it fully expects the movant to promptly request transfer and seek to
`
`stay proceedings pending disposition of the transfer motion, and for the district court to act on
`
`those motions before proceeding to any motion on the merits of the action. See In re Fusion-IO,
`
`Inc., 489 F. App'x 465, 466 (Fed. Cir. 2012). In light of the upcoming Markman hearing, and in
`
`view of the guidance from the Federal Circuit, Samsung respectfully requests that the Court stay
`
`further proceedings pending a ruling by the Court on Samsung’s Motion to Transfer Venue.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 90 Filed 07/28/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 6178
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE: July 28, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Jin-Suk Park
`jin.park@arnoldporter.com
`Ali R. Sharifahmadian
`ali.sharifahmadian@arnoldporter.com
`Paul Margulies
`paul.margulies@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`601 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001-3743
`Telephone: (202) 942-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 942-5555
`
`Ryan M. Nishimoto
`ryan.nishimoto@arnoldporter.com
`Daniel S. Shimell
`daniel.shimell@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 243-4000
`Facsimile: (213) 243-4199
`
`-and-
`
`Melissa Smith
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM & SMITH LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`
`Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 90 Filed 07/28/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 6179
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`I hereby certify that counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants have complied with
`
`the meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h) and Plaintiff opposes the motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
`
`compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have
`
`consented to electronic service, on this 28th day of July, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket