throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 60 Filed 06/15/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1007
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-00186-JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
`SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) and Samsung Electronics America,
`
`
`
`Inc. (“SEA”) (collectively, “Samsung”) respectfully seek leave to file a Second Amended Answer
`
`and Counterclaims. Samsung’s proposed amended pleading removes Samsung’s counterclaim
`
`alleging copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (Count XVIII). Because the Court’s
`
`May 17, 2022 deadline for amended pleadings has passed, Samsung seeks the Court’s leave to
`
`amend. Plaintiff Jawbone Innovations, LLC (“Jawbone”) does not oppose the relief requested in
`
`this motion and has provided written consent to the amended pleading. Therefore, Samsung
`
`respectfully requests that the Court grant Samsung’s motion for leave. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2)
`
`(stating that a party may amend its pleadings with “the opposing party’s written consent or the
`
`court’s leave” and that “[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires”); see also
`
`Matter of Life Partners Holdings, Inc., 926 F.3d 103, 125 (5th Cir. 2019) (“Rule 15(a) evinces a
`
`bias in favor of granting leave to amend.”) (cites and quotes omitted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 60 Filed 06/15/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1008
`
`DATE: June 15, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Jin-Suk Park
`Jin-Suk Park
`jin.park@arnoldporter.com
`Ali R. Sharifahmadian
`ali.sharifahmadian@arnoldporter.com
`Paul Margulies
`paul.margulies@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`601 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001-3743
`Telephone: (202) 942-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 942-5555
`
`Ryan M. Nishimoto
`ryan.nishimoto@arnoldporter.com
`Daniel S. Shimell
`daniel.shimell@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 243-4000
`Facsimile: (213) 243-4199
`
`-and-
`
`Melissa Smith
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM & SMITH LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`
`Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 60 Filed 06/15/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1009
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on June 15, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing Defendants
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc.’s motion with the Clerk of
`
`the Court for the Eastern District of Texas using the ECF System which will send notification to
`
`the registered participants of the ECF System as listed on the Court’s Notice of Electronic Filing.
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`
`
`Counsel for Samsung conferred with Counsel for Jawbone by email, and counsel for
`
`Jawbone confirmed that Jawbone does not oppose the relief requested in this motion.
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket