`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00186-JRG
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE, ANSWER OR
`OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) and Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc. (“SEA”) (together, “Samsung”) move the Court to extend by 30 days the time for Samsung,
`
`without waiving any defenses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, to move, answer, or otherwise respond to
`
`the amended complaint filed by Plaintiff Jawbone Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiff”) on October 26,
`
`2021 (Dkt. 21). Plaintiff does not oppose the relief requested by Samsung’s motion. In support
`
`of its motion, Samsung states as follows:
`
`1.
`
`On October 5, 2021, Samsung filed its answer to the original complaint, and
`
`counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the two asserted
`
`patents. Dkt. 17.
`
`2.
`
`On October 26, 2021, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, alleging infringement
`
`of the two originally asserted patents plus five additional patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 7,246,058,
`
`8,467,543, 8,503,691, 10,779,080, and 11,122,357), for a total of seven patents now asserted
`
`against Samsung. Dkt. 21.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 416
`
`3.
`
`Samsung had no prior notice of this amendment nor otherwise of Plaintiff’s intent
`
`to assert the five additional patents.
`
`4.
`
`Samsung subsequently conferred with Plaintiff regarding an extension to the 14-
`
`day period to respond to an amended complaint to, among other things, allow Samsung to digest
`
`and understand the new allegations.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff agreed to a 30-day extension.
`
`Accordingly, Samsung hereby requests the Court extend the response deadline by
`
`30 days, i.e., from November 9, 2021 to December 9, 2021.
`
`WHEREFORE, Samsung respectfully requests that the time in which it is required to
`
`move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s amended complaint be extended up to and
`
`including December 9, 2021.
`
`Dated: October 29, 2021 Respectfully submitted,
`
` /s/Ryan M. Nishimoto
`Jin-Suk Park
`jin.park@arnoldporter.com
`Paul Margulies
`paul.margulies@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`601 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001-3743
`Telephone: (202) 942-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 942-5555
`
`Ryan M. Nishimoto
`ryan.nishimoto@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 243-4000
`Facsimile: (213) 243-4199
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 10/29/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 417
`
`Patrick Reidy
`patrick.reidy@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`70 West Madison Street, Suite 4200
`Chicago, IL 60602-4231
`Telephone: (312) 583-2424
`Facsimile: (312) 583-2360
`
`-and-
`
`Melissa Smith
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM & SMITH LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`
`Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 10/29/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 418
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel have complied with the meet and confer
`
`requirements of Local Rule 7(h) and this motion is unopposed.
`
`/s/Ryan M. Nishimoto
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on October 29, 2021, the foregoing document was
`
`electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court for the Eastern District of Texas using the ECF
`
`System which will send notification to the registered participants of the ECF System as listed on
`
`the Court’s Notice of Electronic Filing.
`
`/s/Ryan M. Nishimoto
`
`4
`
`