throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 167 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 9642
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`NO. 2:21-CV-0186-JRG-RSP
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ET AL.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Jawbone Innovations, LLC and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Parties”) jointly and respectfully request that
`
`the Court amend its Second Amended Docket Control Order (Dkt. 58) as reflected below and in
`
`the Third Amended Docket Control Order attached hereto.
`
`Current
`Deadline
`
`Amended
`Deadline
`
`Event
`
`*Response to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert
`Motions). Responses to dispositive motions that were filed
`prior to the dispositive motion deadline, including Daubert
`Motions, shall be due in accordance with Local Rule CV-
`7(e), not to exceed the deadline as set forth in this Docket
`Control Order.1 Motions for Summary Judgment shall
`comply with Local Rule CV-56.
`
`*File Motions to Strike Expert Testimony (including
`Daubert
`Motions)
`
`No motion to strike expert testimony (including a Daubert
`motion) may be filed after this date without leave of the
`Court.
`
`November 14,
`2022
`
`November
`21, 2022
`
`October 31,
`2022
`
`November 7,
`2022
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 167 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 9643
`
`Current
`Deadline
`
`Amended
`Deadline
`
`Event
`
`October 31,
`2022
`
`November 7,
`2022
`
`*File Dispositive Motions
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date without
`leave of the Court.
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and Local
`Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits will only be
`granted
`in
`exceptional
`circumstances. Exceptional
`circumstances require more than agreement among the
`parties.
`
`October 24,
`2022
`
`October 27,
`2022
`
`October 11,
`2022
`
`October 18,
`2022
`
`
`
`
`
`Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery on Invalidity
`Issues
`
`Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`September 12,
`2022
`
`September
`19, 2022
`
`Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the Party with the
`Burden of Proof
`
`September 5,
`2022
`
`
`
`No change
`
`Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File Motions to
`Compel Discovery
`
`In addition to these proposed amended deadlines, the parties seek the court’s permission to
`
`take the following depositions after the close of fact discovery.
`
`• Dr. Gregory Burnett (named inventor on all asserted patents and Rule 30(b)(6)
`
`witness for Plaintiff), originally scheduled for August 31 and September 1, but
`
`delayed to September 7 and 8 because of Covid cases within Plaintiff’s counsel’s
`
`team.
`
`• Daniel Setton (Rule 30(b)(6) witness for Plaintiff), originally scheduled for
`
`September 1, but delayed to September 7 and 8 (second day on behalf of Lionel
`
`Capital) based on witness availability.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 167 Filed 09/02/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 9644
`
`• Aliph Brands, JI Audio Holdings and JAWB Acquisition, third parties represented
`
`by Plaintiff’s counsel for which Defendants issued subpoenas on July 29. Daniel
`
`Setton was originally scheduled to testify on behalf of these entities. However,
`
`Plaintiff’s counsel informed Defendants on September 1 that Sason Gabay will
`
`instead testify on behalf of these entities. The Parties are conferring regarding the
`
`scheduling of these depositions.
`
`• Rachel Hager (Rule 30(b)(6) witness for Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,
`
`scheduled for September 9 based on witness availability.
`
`• York Eggleston (Rule 30(b)(6) witness for Plaintiff), originally scheduled for
`
`August 25, but delayed to September 13 and 14 because of Covid cases.
`
`• Houlihan Lokey, third party subpoenaed by defendants on August 12. Plaintiff’s
`
`counsel first appeared on behalf of Houlihan Lokey on August 29. The Parties are
`
`conferring regarding the scheduling of this deposition.
`
`The Parties also seek the Court’s permission to conduct review of source code from third-
`
`parties Shenzhen Goodix Technology Co, Ltd., Goodix Technology Inc., and Fortemedia, Inc.
`
`after the close of fact discovery.
`
`In the Third Amended Docket Control Order, the parties propose brief extensions to the
`
`deadlines for expert discovery, dispositive motions, and motions to strike expert testimony. Good
`
`cause exists for these extensions because certain key fact depositions have been rescheduled due
`
`to Covid cases. For example, Dr. Burnett’s deposition was scheduled to take place prior to the
`
`close of fact discovery, but had to be rescheduled because of Covid cases among Plaintiff’s
`
`counsel. In addition to being a named inventor on all six asserted patents, Plaintiff has designated
`
`Dr. Burnett for twenty-two Rule 30(b)(6) topics. As an additional example, Mr. Eggleston’s
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 167 Filed 09/02/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 9645
`
`deposition2 was originally scheduled to take place prior to the close of fact discovery, but had to
`
`be rescheduled because of Covid cases. Mr. Eggleston is designated on sixty-one Rule 30(b)(6)
`
`topics.
`
`As shown in the proposed Third Amended Docket Control Order, the parties do not propose
`
`changes to any dates after the date for responses to dispositive motions, and the requested relief
`
`does not impact the currently-scheduled trial date in this matter.
`
`
`
`Dated: September 2, 2022
`
` /s/ _Alfred R. Fabricant____________
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Richard M. Cowell
`NY Bar No. 4617759
`Email: rcowell@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
` Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`Email: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`Email: jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300
`
`2 On August 30, 2022, Magistrate Judge Payne issued an order granting in part defendants’ motion to compel, which
`permits a second day of deposition for Mr. Eggleston.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jin-Suk Park
`Jin-Suk Park
`jin.park@arnoldporter.com
`Paul Margulies
`paul.margulies@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`601 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001-3743
`Telephone: (202) 942-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 942-5555
`
`Patrick C. Reidy
`patrick.reidy@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`70 West Madison Street, Suite 4200
`Chicago, IL 60602
`Telephone: (312) 583-2424
`Facsimile: (312) 583-2360
`
`
`Ryan M. Nishimoto
`ryan.nishimoto@arnoldporter.com
`Daniel S. Shimell
`daniel.shimell@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER
`LLP
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 167 Filed 09/02/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 9646
`
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC
`
`
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 243-4000
`Facsimile: (213) 243-4199
`
`-and-
`
`Melissa Smith
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM & SMITH LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`
`Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing documents was filed electronically in
`
`compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who has
`
`consented to electronic service, on this 2nd day of September 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`I hereby certify that counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants have complied with
`
`Local Rule CV-7(h) by conferring, and all parties agree to filing this as a joint motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket