throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 148 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 9429
`
`
`JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION

`

`Case No. 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP

`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED


`








`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC’S SUR-REPLY IN OPPOSITION
`TO DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO STAY (DKT. 90)
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 148 Filed 08/25/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 9430
`
`
`
`Samsung is not entitled to a stay pending a decision on its motion to transfer because
`
`Samsung unreasonably delayed in filing that motion. Samsung’s motion to transfer was filed June
`
`15, 2022, thirteen months after this case was filed, and briefing was completed July 27, 2022, less
`
`than one month ago. See Dkts. 59, 89. Samsung offers no explanation for its delay in filing its
`
`motion to transfer, but nonetheless relies on case law making prompt filing of a transfer motion a
`
`condition for obtaining a stay. See In re Fusion-IO, Inc., 489 F. App’x 465, 466 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
`
`Samsung’s reply concedes that In re Fusion-IO does not support its motion by failing to address
`
`this flaw in its motion on reply.
`
`Samsung’s reliance on reply on In re SK hynix Inc. and In re Google Inc. is unpersuasive
`
`for the same reason—the defendants had filed motions to transfer at the outset of the case. See In
`
`re SK hynix Inc., 835 F. App’x 600 (Fed. Cir. 2021) (granting petition for mandamus where
`
`defendant moved to transfer two months after filing of the complaint and moved to stay
`
`proceedings nearly seven months after briefing was complete); see also In re Google Inc., No.
`
`2015-138, 2015 WL 5294800, at *1 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2015) (where defendant filed its motion to
`
`transfer three months after filing of the complaint and remained pending eight months after
`
`briefing was complete). Samsung has presented no authority that a defendant which waits thirteen
`
`months to file a motion to transfer is entitled to a stay.
`
`Rather than address the Fifth Circuit’s stay factors analyzed in Jawbone’s response in
`
`opposition, Samsung dismisses the factors as irrelevant in light of Federal Circuit mandamus
`
`decisions. Reply at 2. Jawbone submits that the stay factors control both of Samsung’s stay
`
`motions and show that a stay of the proceedings is not warranted. See Dkt. 115. Accordingly,
`
`Jawbone respectfully requests that the Court deny Samsung’s Motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 148 Filed 08/25/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 9431
`
`I.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For all the foregoing reasons, Jawbone respectfully requests that Samsung’s Motion to Stay
`
`Pending Resolution of its Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. 90) be denied in its entirety.
`
`Dated: August 25, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /s/ Peter Lambrianakos
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Richard M. Cowell
`NY Bar No. 4617759
`Email: rcowell@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
`Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`Email: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`Email: jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00186-JRG-RSP Document 148 Filed 08/25/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 9432
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on August 25, 2022, all counsel of record who are
`
`deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via
`
`the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`/s/ Peter Lambrianakos
` Peter Lambrianakos
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket