throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 97 Filed 07/02/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2739
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-cv-72 [JRG/RSP]
`LEAD CASE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-cv-29 [JRG/RSP]
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC §
`
`
`
`
`
`

`v.
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`

`T-MOBILE USA, INC. and T-MOBILE

`US, INC.
`
`
`
`

`_______
`
`
`
`

`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC §
`
`
`
`
`
`

`v.
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`

`WHATSAPP, INC.
`
`
`

`
`
`DEFENDANT WHATSAPP, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A HEARING
`ON ITS PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
`FOR IMPROPER VENUE [DKT. 63]
`
`Defendant WhatsApp, Inc. (“WhatsApp”) respectfully moves for a hearing, at the Court’s
`
`
`
`
`earliest convenience, on its Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Improper Venue [Dkt.
`
`63] (“Motion to Dismiss”). On June 23, 2021, WhatsApp filed its sur-reply to WhatsApp’s Motion
`
`to Dismiss [Dkt. 95]. WhatsApp’s Motion to Dismiss has been fully briefed and is ripe for
`
`consideration. Accordingly, WhatsApp respectfully requests a hearing at the Court’s earliest
`
`convenience.
`
`
`
`WhatsApp recognizes that the Court has discretion regarding whether or not the Court
`
`conducts an oral hearing regarding this motion and respectfully submits that oral argument will
`
`aid the Court in resolving the legal and factual issues implicated by WhatsApp’s motion.
`
`
`
`Counsel for WhatsApp has conferred with counsel for AGIS regarding this motion, and
`
`while AGIS does not believe that the hearing requested by WhatsApp is necessary, AGIS does not
`
`oppose a hearing should the Court decide to set one.
`
`{A07/10739/0001/W1728209.1 }
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 97 Filed 07/02/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2740
`
`
`
` Date: July 2, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Lisa K. Nguyen, with permission by
`Michael E. Jones
`
`Michael E. Jones
`SBN: 10929400
`Patrick C. Clutter
`SBN: 24036374
`POTTER MINTON, PC
`110 North College, Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: 903-597-8311
`Fax: 903-593-0846
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`patrickclutter@potterminton.com
`
`Lisa K. Nguyen
`Richard G. Frenkel
`Clara Wang
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`140 Scott Drive
`Menlo Park, CA 94025-1008
`Tel: (650) 328-4600 / Fax: (650) 463-2600
`lisa.nguyen@lw.com
`rick.frenkel@lw.com
`clara.wang@lw.com
`
`Alan Billharz
`Tiffany C. Weston
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, NW
`Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 637-2200 / Fax: (202) 637-2201
`alan.billharz@lw.com
`tiffany.weston@lw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant WhatsApp LLC
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on July 2, 2021counsel for Defendants complied
`
`with the meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(i). This motion is unopposed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael E. Jones
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`{A07/10739/0001/W1728209.1 }
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket