Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 364 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 23206
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`v.
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC., and T-MOBILE
`US, INC.
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`v.
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00024-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
`BILL OF COSTS AND MOTION FOR FEES
`
`
`
`
`
`On January 19, 2022, the Court granted Lyft, Inc.’s (“Lyft”) motion to dismiss for improper
`
`venue (Dkt. 334). Although the Parties dispute whether Lyft is the prevailing party1 in this case
`
`due to the Court’s January 19, 2022 Order, to avoid burdening this Court with issues that may not
`
`need to be adjudicated, the Parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Lyft to file any
`
`motion for costs and fees in this case until thirty days after the resolution of the Lyft, Inc. v. AGIS
`
`Software Development LLC case, No. 3:21-cv-04653, pending in the Northern District of
`
`California (“NDCA case”). The Parties stipulate that this Court will retain jurisdiction to decide
`
`
`1 The parties do not waive any arguments or rights with this stipulation. AGIS does not agree
`that Lyft is a prevailing party under the applicable rules and reserves the right to challenge any
`motion for costs or fees on any grounds, including the ground that Lyft is not a prevailing party.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`v.
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC., and T-MOBILE
`US, INC.
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`v.
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00024-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
`BILL OF COSTS AND MOTION FOR FEES
`
`
`
`
`
`On January 19, 2022, the Court granted Lyft, Inc.’s (“Lyft”) motion to dismiss for improper
`
`venue (Dkt. 334). Although the Parties dispute whether Lyft is the prevailing party1 in this case
`
`due to the Court’s January 19, 2022 Order, to avoid burdening this Court with issues that may not
`
`need to be adjudicated, the Parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Lyft to file any
`
`motion for costs and fees in this case until thirty days after the resolution of the Lyft, Inc. v. AGIS
`
`Software Development LLC case, No. 3:21-cv-04653, pending in the Northern District of
`
`California (“NDCA case”). The Parties stipulate that this Court will retain jurisdiction to decide
`
`
`1 The parties do not waive any arguments or rights with this stipulation. AGIS does not agree
`that Lyft is a prevailing party under the applicable rules and reserves the right to challenge any
`motion for costs or fees on any grounds, including the ground that Lyft is not a prevailing party.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 364 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 23207
`
`any motion for costs and/or fees that Lyft files within thirty days of the resolution2 of the NDCA
`
`case.
`
`This motion for extension supersedes and moots Lyft’s previous motions for extensions
`
`(Dkts. 356 & 363). In light of the present filing, Lyft will withdraw its previous motions (Dkts.
`
`356 & 363).
`
`Date: February 23, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jeremy J. Taylor
`Jeremy J. Taylor
`Arya Moshiri (Pro Hac Vice)
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Suite 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 291-6200
`Facsimile: (415) 291-6300
`
`Danny David
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`danny.david@bakerbotts.com
`910 Louisiana Street
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: (713) 229-1234
`Facsimile: (713) 229-1522
`
`Kurt Pankratz
`Bethany R. Salpietra
`Megan LaDriere White
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`megan.ladriere@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: (214) 953-6500
`Facsimile: (214) 953-6503
`
`
`
`2 For the purposes of this motion only, the parties agree that “resolution” means a final judgment
`or an order disposing of all claims and counterclaims in the NDCA case.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 364 Filed 02/23/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 23208
`
`Jennifer C. Tempesta
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`jennifer.tempesta@bakerbotts.com
`30 Rockefeller Plaza, 44th Floor
`New York, NY 10112
`Telephone: (212) 408-2571
`Facsimile: (212) 259-2571
`
`Lauren J. Dreyer
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`lauren.dreyer@bakerbotts.com
`700 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 2000
`Telephone: (202) 639-7823
`Facsimile: (202) 639-1153
`
`Brianna Potter (Pro Hac Vice)
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`brianna.potter@bakerbotts.com
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 739-7556
`Facsimile: (650) 739-7656
`
`Deron R. Dacus
`The Dacus Firm, P.C.
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas 75701
`Telephone: (903) 705-1117
`Facsimile: (903) 581-2543
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Lyft, Inc.
`
`/s/ Alfred R. Fabricant
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Ave.,
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 364 Filed 02/23/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 23209
`
`Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff AGIS Software
`Development LLC
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 364 Filed 02/23/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 23210
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented
`
`to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF
`
`system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 23rd day of February, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jeremy J. Taylor
`Jeremy J. Taylor
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on February 23, 2022 all counsel of record have met
`
`and conferred via email in accordance with Local Rule CV-7(h), and that the parties agreed to the
`
`relief requested herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jeremy J. Taylor
`Jeremy J. Taylor
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
