throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG Document 34-10 Filed 04/27/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 569
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG Document 34-10 Filed 04/27/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 569
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG Document 34-10 Filed 04/27/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 570
`
`
`
` | P E R S P E C T I V E S O N T E X A S
`
`A publication of The Texas Tribune
`
`About
`GOVERNMENT
`
`Data centers are a wise investment
`for Texas
`
`Authors
`
`Submit
`
`By Charlie Geren,  July 16, 2015
`Sponsor Content
`
`Republish
`
`Donate
`
`The Texas Tribune
`
`Close 
`
`Photo by Jennifer Whitney
`
`I passed House Bill 2712 this year to make Texas a top contender among states competing for large data center
`projects, and to bring more investment and revenue to Tarrant County and the state.
`
`As a result, Facebook has already broken ground on its fifth data center worldwide after selecting Fort Worth out
`of 220 cities that were candidates for the project. The center will bring in billions of dollars in capital investment,
`create jobs and send more revenue to state and local governments. This is exciting news for Tarrant County and
`for Texas.
`
`To lure projects like this to Texas, lawmakers this year offered a number of proposals, including one that involved
`property tax benefits. The Legislature opted against property tax incentives and instead allowed for sales tax
`exemptions on certain tangible personal property used in data centers of at least 250,000 square feet.
`
`But these incentives are merely a small investment when compared with the economic benefits these data centers
`offer locally and at the state level. To put it into perspective, the city of Fort Worth reported that it had been
`
`

`

` | P E R S P E C T I V E S O N T E X A S
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG Document 34-10 Filed 04/27/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 571
`collecting only $2,720 annually from taxes on the property where the Facebook data center will be located. Now,
`
`
`the city reports that it will collect, on average, more than $2.4 million from the new project on that same property.
`That's at least $48 million in additional tax revenue over the next 20 years, and is equivalent to the annual property
`A publication of The Texas Tribune
`taxes on more than 1,400 homes appraised at $250,000 — only this project takes up a much smaller footprint and
`doesn’t require the service demands of the thousands of residents who would accompany those homes. A project
`About
`of this size hasn’t come to Tarrant County without an incentive in the past 25 years.
`
`The sales tax exemption provided through HB 2712 does not impact the property taxes collected by the Northwest
`Authors
`Independent School District, which, with its full tax rate applied, will collect more than $150 million in property
`taxes over the next 20 years. 
`Submit
`
`Tarrant County and its hospital district have said they will also benefit significantly from the data center. Previously,
`Sponsor Content
`because of an agricultural exemption on the vacant property on which Facebook is locating, the county and the
`hospital district collected a combined $80 in property taxes annually. Now, the two entities will receive a combined
`estimated $30 million in tax revenue from the project, even while Facebook is receiving a 10-year tax abatement
`Republish
`incentive from the county and the hospital district.
`
`Donate
`The sales tax exemption on data center equipment provided by HB 2712 also makes Tarrant County and the state of
`Texas a prime destination for additional data center locations in the future. These projects are good for the area
`The Texas Tribune
`because they provide a high level of property investment and value on the tax rolls without further straining the
`roadway infrastructure along the already crowded Interstate 35W corridor.
`Close 
`Bringing Facebook to Fort Worth would not have been possible without the collective effort of local and state
`officials who created reasonable and responsible incentives to attract a project of this size. I’m confident that
`making this investment now will provide substantial benefits to Fort Worth and Tarrant County and, in the words of
`Gov. Greg Abbott, "help us build an even more robust and diverse economy here in the state of Texas."
`
`Charlie Geren
`
`State representative, R-Fort Worth
`
`@charliegeren
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` PREVIOUS
`
`SPONSOR CONTENT:
`What we've learned about high school equivalency
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG Document 34-10 Filed 04/27/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 572
`Amy Riker, Educational Testing Service
`
`
`NEXT 
`
` | P E R S P E C T I V E S O N T E X A S
`
`A publication of The Texas Tribune
`
`The conservative case for more rail transit in Texas
`About
`William S. Lind, Director of the American Conservative Center for Public Transportation
`Authors
`
`SHARE
`
` Twitter
` Facebook
`
`Submit
`TRIBTALK
`© 2019 TribTalk
`Sponsor Content
`A publication of:
`
`Republish
`
`Donate
`
`The Texas Tribune
`
`Close 
`
`INFO
`
`About Us
`Authors
`Submit
`Sponsor Content
`Donate
`Terms of Service
`Privacy Policy
`Code of Ethics
`Contact
`RSS Feed
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket