`20670
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a
`UBER,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00026-JRG
`(MEMBER CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`v.
`
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC. and T-MOBILE US,
`INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`§
`
`§
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG
`§
`(LEAD CASE)
`§
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`D/B/A UBER’S SECOND MOTION TO STAY FOLLOWING GRANTED EPRS
`AND INSTITUTED IPRS FOR ALL ASSERTED CLAIMS OF
`ALL ASSERTED PATENTS AND REQUEST FOR HEARING (DKT. 297)
`
`Before the Court is Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Uber’s (“Defendant”) Second
`
`Motion to Stay Following Granted EPRs and Instituted IPRs for All Asserted Claims of All
`
`Asserted Patents and Request for Hearing (Dkt. 297).
`
`The Court, after consideration, is of the opinion that said motion should be DENIED.
`
`IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant’s Second Motion to Stay Following
`
`Granted EPRs and Instituted IPRs for All Asserted Claims of All Asserted Patents and Request for
`
`Hearing (Dkt. 297) is hereby DENIED.
`
`