Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 243 Filed 12/07/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 7971
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC. and T-MOBILE US,
`INC.,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG
`§
`(LEAD CASE)
`§
`
`§
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR MUTUAL EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE
`OBJECTIONS AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING
`THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 212) ON DEFENDANT
`LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE (DKT. 30) AND FOR
`RESPONSES TO THE SAME
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS” or “Plaintiff”) and Defendant Lyft,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`LYFT, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00024-JRG
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`Inc. (“Lyft” or “Defendant”) jointly move, with the Court’s permission, for (1) a one-week
`
`extension of time up to and including December 15, 2021 for AGIS file its objections and motion
`
`for reconsideration regarding the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 212) on Defendant Lyft,
`
`Inc.’s (“Lyft” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 30); and (2) a two-week extension of time
`
`up for Lyft to file its responses to AGIS’s objections and motion for reconsideration. The Court
`
`previously granted an extension of time to AGIS to December 8, 2021 (Dkt. 240).
`
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC. and T-MOBILE US,
`INC.,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG
`§
`(LEAD CASE)
`§
`
`§
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR MUTUAL EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE
`OBJECTIONS AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING
`THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 212) ON DEFENDANT
`LYFT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE (DKT. 30) AND FOR
`RESPONSES TO THE SAME
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS” or “Plaintiff”) and Defendant Lyft,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`LYFT, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00024-JRG
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`Inc. (“Lyft” or “Defendant”) jointly move, with the Court’s permission, for (1) a one-week
`
`extension of time up to and including December 15, 2021 for AGIS file its objections and motion
`
`for reconsideration regarding the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 212) on Defendant Lyft,
`
`Inc.’s (“Lyft” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 30); and (2) a two-week extension of time
`
`up for Lyft to file its responses to AGIS’s objections and motion for reconsideration. The Court
`
`previously granted an extension of time to AGIS to December 8, 2021 (Dkt. 240).
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 243 Filed 12/07/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 7972
`
`AGIS and Lyft have conferred on this motion, and the parties respectfully request that the
`
`Court grant this Unopposed Motion for a further extension of time and advise that they do not file
`
`this Motion for purposes of delay. Regarding AGIS’s requested extension, on December 7, 2021,
`
`the laptop computers of the attorneys responsible for preparing the objections and motion for
`
`reconsideration were stolen from a meeting room at a conference attended by AGIS’s counsel.
`
`AGIS requests the one-week extension to allow for its counsel to obtain replacement computers
`
`and complete the preparation of the papers. Lyft requests the two-week extension in view of the
`
`complexity of the issues and the new deadline falling within the holidays. Accordingly, the parties
`
`requests that the Court grant the foregoing Motion and enter an Order extending the deadlines (1)
`
`for AGIS to file its objections and motion for reconsideration up to and including December 15,
`
`2021, and (2) for Lyft to file its responses up to and including January 12, 2022.
`
`Dated: December 7, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Road, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`Email: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`Email: jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 243 Filed 12/07/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 7973
`
`
`
`
`
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 e. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`/s/ Jeremy Taylor
`Jeremy Taylor
`Arya Moshiri (Pro Hac Vice)
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`arya.moshiri@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Suite 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 291-6200
`Facsimile: (415) 291-6300
`
`Danny David
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`danny.david@bakerbotts.com
`910 Louisiana Street
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: (713) 229-1234
`Facsimile: (713) 229-1522
`
`Kurt Pankratz
`Bethany R. Salpietra
`Megan LaDriere White
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`bethany.salpietra@bakerbotts.com
`megan.ladriere@bakerbotts.com
`2001 Ross Ave., Ste. 900
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: (214) 953-6500
`Facsimile: (214) 953-6503
`
`Deron R. Dacus
`The Dacus Firm, P.C.
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas 75701
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 243 Filed 12/07/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 7974
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 243 Filed 12/07/21 Page 4of5PagelD#: 7974
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`LYFT, INC.
`LYFT, INC.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 243 Filed 12/07/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 7975
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on December 7, 2021, all counsel of record who are
`
`deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via
`
`the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
` Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record have met and conferred in
`
`accordance with Local Rule CV-7(h) and this motion is unopposed with the parties agreeing to a
`
`further one-week extension of time for Plaintiff to respond.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
` Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
