`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC. and T-MOBILE US,
`INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`§
`
`§
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`§
`§
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a
`UBER,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00026-JRG
`(MEMBER CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`D/B/A UBER’S OPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES
`TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 11 AND 12 (DKT. 193)
`
`
`Before the Court is Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Uber’s (“Defendant”)
`
`Opposed Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 11 And 12 (Dkt. 193).
`
`The Court, after consideration, is of the opinion that said motion should be DENIED.
`
`IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Opposed Motion to Compel Responses to
`
`Interrogatory Nos. 11 And 12 (Dkt. 193) is hereby DENIED.
`
`
`
`