throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:
`6244
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 2 of 22 PageID #:
`6245
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 3 of 22 PageID #:
`6246
`
`PTAB Trial Statistics
`FY20 End of Year Outcome Roundup
`IPR, PGR, CBM
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`Fiscal Year 2020
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 4 of 22 PageID #:
`6247
`
`FY20 PTAB outcome roundup
`• Generally speaking regarding AIA petitions in
`FY2020:
`– one-third were denied
`– one-third settled or otherwise terminated
`– one-third resulted in a final written decision.
`
`• AIA institution rate = about 56% (out of all
`decisions on institution).
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 5 of 22 PageID #:
`6248
`
`FY20 PTAB outcome roundup
`Considering all Outcomes in AIA Proceedings in
`FY2020:
`– PTAB issued 508 final written decisions addressing
`413 different patents.
`– Less than 30% of challenged claims were found
`unpatentable by a preponderance of the evidence in
`final written decisions.
`– Less than 40% of challenged patents were addressed
`in a final written decision at all.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 6 of 22 PageID #:
`6249
`
`Petitions filed by trial type
`(FY20: Oct. 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`IPR
`1,429
`95%
`
`1,513
`Total
`
`CBM
`20
`1%
`PGR
`64
`4%
`
`Trial types include Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post Grant Review (PGR), and Covered
`Business Method (CBM). The Office will not consider a CBM petition filed on or after
`September 16, 2020.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 7 of 22 PageID #:
`6250
`
`Petitions filed by technology
`(FY20: Oct. 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`Mechanical &
`Business Method
`396
`26%
`
`1,513
`Total
`
`Electrical/Computer
`921
`61%
`
`Chemical
`98
`7%
`Bio/Pharma
`78
`5%
`Design
`20
`1%
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 8 of 22 PageID #:
`6251
`
`Petitions filed by month
`(Sept. 2020 and Previous 12 Months: Sept. 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`(1,429 IPRs in FY20)
`
`144
`
`150
`
`97
`
`99
`
`74
`
`79
`
`Sep-19
`
`88
`
`85
`
`IPR
`
`3 5 2 3 1
`Sep-19
`
`(64 PGRs in FY20)
`10 9 9 7 6 3 4 5
`PGR
`
`Sep-20
`
`5
`
`0 0
`
`Sep-19
`
`152
`
`155
`
`151
`
`133
`
`119
`
`Sep-20
`(20 CBMs in FY20)
`8
`
`0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 1
`CBM
`Sep-20
`
`The Office will not consider a CBM petition filed on or after September 16, 2020.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 9 of 22 PageID #:
`6252
`
`Institution rates by petition
`
`(FY16 to FY20: Oct. 1, 2015 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`Institution rate is calculated by dividing petitions instituted by decisions on institution
`(i.e., petitions instituted plus petitions denied). The outcomes of decisions on
`institution responsive to requests for rehearing are excluded.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 10 of 22 PageID #:
`6253
`
`Institution rates by patent
`
`(FY16 to FY20: Oct. 1, 2015 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`A patent is “instituted” if any petition challenging that patent is instituted. A patent is
`“denied” if no petitions challenging that patent are instituted. Patents that have not
`received a Decision on Institution are not included in this data set.
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 11 of 22 PageID #:
`6254
`
`Institution rates by patent and by petition
`(FY16 to FY20: Oct. 1, 2015 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`73%
`
`67%
`
`69%
`
`63%
`
`67%
`
`60%
`
`70%
`
`63%
`
`by Patent
`64%
`
`56%
`
`by Petition
`
`FY16
`
`FY17
`
`FY18
`
`FY19
`
`FY20
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 12 of 22 PageID #:
`6255
`
`Institution rates by technology
`(FY20: Oct. 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`Bio/Pharma
`
`Chemical
`
`Design
`
`Electrical/Computer
`
`Mechanical &
`Business Method
`
`14%
`
`48%
`
`59%
`
`58%
`
`55%
`
`Institution rate for each technology is calculated by dividing petitions instituted by
`decisions on institution (i.e., petitions instituted plus petitions denied). The outcomes
`of decisions on institution responsive to requests for rehearing are excluded.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 13 of 22 PageID #:
`6256
`
`Settlements
`(FY16 to FY20: Oct. 1, 2015 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`Settlement Rate
`26%
`
`Settlements
`Post-
`Institution
`Pre-
`Institution
`
`436
`194
`
`242
`
`FY16
`
`26%
`
`436
`187
`
`249
`
`FY17
`
`25%
`
`401
`
`201
`
`200
`
`FY18
`
`31%
`
`502
`
`243
`
`259
`
`FY19
`
`22%
`
`309
`146
`
`163
`
`FY20
`
`Settlement rate is calculated by dividing total settlements by concluded proceedings in
`each fiscal year (i.e., denied institution, settled, dismissed, requested adverse judgment,
`and final written decision), excluding joined cases.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 14 of 22 PageID #:
`6257
`
`Outcomes by petition
`
`(FY20: Oct. 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`FWD patentability or unpatentability reported with respect to the claims at issue in the FWD. Joined cases are excluded.
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 15 of 22 PageID #:
`6258
`
`Outcomes by patent
`
`(FY20: Oct. 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`FWD patentability or unpatentability reported with respect to the claims at issue in the FWD. “Mixed Outcome” is shown for patents
`receiving more than one type of outcome from the list of: denied, settled, dismissed, and/or req. adverse judgement only. A patent is
`listed in a FWD category if it ever received a FWD, regardless of other outcomes.
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 16 of 22 PageID #:
`6259
`
`Outcomes by claim challenged
`
`(FY20: Oct. 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 17 of 22 PageID #:
`6260
`
`Claim outcomes
`(FY20: Oct. 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2020)
`
`*”No DI” and “No FWD” means the
`claim was challenged but not
`addressed in a DI/FWD, e.g., due to
`settlement.
`
`28% of challenged claims and 53% of
`instituted claims were found
`unpatentable by a preponderance of the
`evidence in FY20.
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 18 of 22 PageID #:
`6261
`
`All patents, fiscal year 2020:
`
`The area inside each circle is scaled to the number of patents in the category.
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 19 of 22 PageID #:
`6262
`
`Appendix
`
`This presentation, as well as appendices are available on PTAB’s statistics webpage:
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-trial-and-appeal-board/statistics
`
`Appendix A: Motion to Amend Study (Installment 6, through March 31, 2020)
`– A report on the outcomes of pre-pilot motions to amend in AIA trials and some limited data
`for motions to amend filed under the Office’s pilot program.
`– Originally published in July 2020.
`Appendix B: Trial statistics by patent and by claims
`– A report providing various AIA trial statistics, including results by petition, by patent, and by
`claim; also includes an update on multiple petitions
`– Originally presented in June 2020.
`Appendix C: Methodology for FY20 Roundup Statistics
`– Technical details of the methodology used in generating the FY20 Outcome Roundup.
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 20 of 22 PageID #:
`6263
`
`Questions? Comments? Suggestions?
`We welcome your feedback.
`
`Please direct questions, comments, or suggestions relating to this presentation, or other statistical
`or data-related matters to:
`PTABStatisticsQuestions@USPTO.GOV
`
`Please direct comments, questions, or suggestions relating to AIA proceedings in general to:
`PTABAIATrialSuggestions@USPTO.GOV
`
`19
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 21 of 22 PageID #:
`6264
`
`Want to know more about PTAB?
`Please visit our website:
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-trial-and-appeal-board
`
`PTAB AIA Trials Website:
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-trial-and-appeal-board/trials
`
`PTAB Statistics Website (updated monthly):
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-trial-and-appeal-board/statistics
`
`PTAB Databases and Open Data (updated daily):
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-trial-and-appeal-board/ptab-it-systems
`
`20
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 180-3 Filed 10/25/21 Page 22 of 22 PageID #:
`6265
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket