`3251
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:
`3252
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`v.
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC., AND T-MOBILE
`US, INC.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`v.
`
`UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`d/b/a UBER,
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP
`(Lead Case)
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00026-JRG-RSP
`(Member Case)
`
`DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S
`FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`
`Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Uber Technologies,
`
`Inc. (“Uber”) hereby serve its First Set of Interrogatories upon Plaintiff AGIS Software
`
`Development LLC (“Plaintiff” or “AGIS”) to be answered fully, in writing, and under oath within
`
`thirty (30) days of service hereof. These Interrogatories are continuing in nature and require
`
`supplemental responses. The following Definitions and Instructions apply.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`“You,” “Your,” “Plaintiffs,” and/or “AGIS” shall refer to the responding Plaintiff AGIS
`
`Software Development LLC, and any and all of its then-current or prior subsidiaries,
`
`parents, affiliates, divisions, successors, predecessors, agents, employees, representatives,
`
`directors, officers, trustees, and attorneys, or any other person or entity acting in whole or
`
`in part in concert with any of the foregoing, directly or indirectly.
`
`2.
`
`“Employee” shall refer to any officer, director, partner, employee, representative, or agent.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:
`3253
`
`
`3.
`
`“Person” shall refer to any natural person, firm, association, partnership, government
`
`agency, corporation, proprietorship, or other entity and its officers, directors, partners,
`
`employee, representatives, and agents.
`
`4.
`
`“Action(s)” shall refer to the above-captioned proceeding in the United States District
`
`Court for the Eastern District of Texas, with case numbers 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP (Lead
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Case), 2:21-cv-00026-JRG-RSP (Member Case).
`
`“Asserted Patents” shall refer to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,031,728; 7,630,724; 8,213,970;
`
`10,299,100; and 10,34,838.
`
`“Asserted Claim” shall refer to each claim of the Asserted Patents that You assert in this
`
`Action.
`
`“Complaint” shall refer to the Complaint (including exhibits) Plaintiff filed on January 29,
`
`2021.
`
`“Counterpart” shall refer to any and all patents in any country based upon any applications
`
`related in any fashion to the Asserted Patents (or to the corresponding application on which
`
`it was granted), including any counterparts and any patents that may have been opposed,
`
`re-examined, re-issued, or subjected to any validity or nullity proceeding.
`
`9.
`
`“Named Inventor” shall refer to any individual who is listed as an inventor on the Asserted
`
`Patents or any Counterpart thereof.
`
`10.
`
`“Prior Art” encompasses, without limitation, the subject matter described in each and every
`
`subdivision of 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, and includes, but is not limited to, memoranda,
`
`notes, manuals, interviews, testing data, disclosures, prototypes, correspondence,
`
`drawings, papers, articles, patents, printed publications, public uses, demonstrations, offers
`
`for sale or license, and sales.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:
`3254
`
`
`11.
`
`“Communication” shall mean, without limitation, any written, oral, or other transmission
`
`of information.
`
`12.
`
`“Document” shall include, without limitation, all documents, electronically stored
`
`information, and tangible things within the scope of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
`
`including Rule 34.
`
`13.
`
`“Concerning,” “refer to,” “reflecting,” and “relating to” shall mean relating to, referring to,
`
`mentioning, reflecting, pertaining to, evidencing, involving, describing, discussing,
`
`commenting on, embodying, responding to, supporting, contradicting, or constituting (in
`
`whole or in part), as the context makes appropriate.
`
`14.
`
`“Thing” refers to and includes any tangible object other than a document, and includes
`
`objects of every kind and nature including, but not limited to, prototypes, models, and
`
`specimens.
`
`15.
`
`The words “and” and “or” shall be construed conjunctively or disjunctively, whichever
`
`makes the request more inclusive.
`
`16.
`
`Any pronouns shall be construed to refer to the masculine, feminine, or neutral gender, in
`
`singular or plural, as in each case is most appropriate.
`
`The word “each” shall be construed to mean “each and every.”
`
`The words “any” and “all” shall be construed to mean “any and all.”
`
`The singular form of any word shall be construed to also include the plural, and vice-versa.
`
`“Identify” (or “Identification”) in relation to a natural person shall refer to: (a) the person’s
`
`full name and any nicknames; (b) present or last known contact information (including
`
`address, telephone number, and email address); (c) if You are unaware of the person’s
`
`present whereabouts, all information known to You that reasonably may be helpful in
`
`3
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:
`3255
`
`
`locating said person; and (d) whether the person ever has been employed by You—and if
`
`so, his or her current employment position and relevant dates of employment.
`
`21.
`
`“Identify” (or “Identification”) when used with respect to a communication shall refer to
`
`the names of the parties to the communication, the date or approximate date of the
`
`communication, and the substance of the communication, and to list all documents
`
`containing or relating to the communication.
`
`22.
`
`“Identify” (or “Identification”) in relation to a Document shall refer to: (a) the date the
`
`Document was created; (b) the author(s) of the Document; (c) the recipient(s) of the
`
`Document; (d) any person or entity receiving a copy of the Document by “cc,” “bcc,” or
`
`otherwise; (e) a basic description of the nature of the Document, including, if applicable;
`
`(f) the title of the Document; and (g) whether the Document has been or is being produced
`
`in this litigation, the Bates or identifier number affixed to the Document. Documents to be
`
`“identified” include Documents in Plaintiffs’ possession, custody, or control, Documents
`
`known by Plaintiff to have existed but no longer exist, and other Documents of which
`
`Plaintiff has knowledge or information.
`
`
`
`INSTRUCTIONS
`
`The following instructions shall apply to each of the interrogatories herein.
`
`1.
`
`You are required to answer the following interrogatories separately and fully in writing and
`
`under oath, within thirty (30) days from the date of service. When answering the
`
`interrogatories, you are required to furnish such information as is available to you,
`
`including, but not limited to, information known to your officers, employees, agents, or
`
`anyone acting for or on your behalf.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:
`3256
`
`
`2.
`
`If you have no information about the subject of a particular interrogatory, or if for some
`
`other reason you are unable to answer it, the response to that interrogatory should
`
`specifically so state. No interrogatory should be without some response.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`If you cannot answer an interrogatory completely, answer as fully as you can and specify
`
`the ways in which your response may be incomplete because of your lack of knowledge.
`
`If you do not know exact dates, amounts, or other facts with certainty, but you have
`
`information from which you can make an approximate or estimated answer, do so and
`
`indicate if the answer is an approximate or estimate because you lack more precise
`
`information.
`
`5.
`
`Documents produced pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, or in lieu of
`
`answering pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), should be expressly identified
`
`to the interrogatory to which they pertain.
`
`6.
`
`These discovery requests are deemed to be continuing such as to require you to serve
`
`supplemental answers should you learn of additional information, documents, or tangible
`
`things called for by these discovery requests between the time your answers are served and
`
`the time of trial; supplemental answers are required to be served within a reasonable time
`
`after the discovery of such additional information or documents.
`
`7.
`
`If you assert a claim of privilege or work product protection in objecting to any
`
`interrogatory, identify with respect to each communication, document, or tangible thing
`
`the nature and basis of the privilege claimed, and provide as much of the following
`
`information as is not encompassed by the privilege: its type; its general subject matter and
`
`purpose; its date; the names of persons making or receiving the communication, document,
`
`or tangible thing or a copy thereof or, if the communication was oral, the names of those
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:
`3257
`
`
`present when the communication was made; their relationship to the author or speaker; and
`
`any other information needed to determine the applicability of the privilege or protection.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 1
`
`INTERROGATORIES
`
`For each product You allege infringes, describe the circumstances under which Plaintiff
`
`first became aware of the product’s alleged infringement, including, but not limited to, the date(s)
`
`upon which Plaintiff first became aware of the product; the date upon which Plaintiff first became
`
`aware that the product allegedly infringed any claim of the Asserted Patents; any investigations,
`
`reverse engineering, analyses, tests, or studies done on the product by or on behalf of Plaintiff with
`
`respect to possible infringement of any claim of the Asserted Patents, including without limitation
`
`to the date, procedures, and results of such analyses, tests, or studies; and an identification of all
`
`persons involved in any such analyses, tests, or studies and any documents or things that refer or
`
`relate to the subject matter of this interrogatory.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 2
`
`For each Asserted Claim, identify the earliest priority date to which You contend that
`
`Asserted Claim is entitled, including an identification and description of any corroborating
`
`evidence for the circumstances of any claimed conception and reduction to practice of that
`
`Asserted Claim, as well as an identification of the claim’s date of conception, the date of first
`
`actual reduction to practice of the claim, all acts Plaintiff contends represent diligence from
`
`conception to first actual reduction to practice and diligence from conception to constructive
`
`reduction to practice, all embodiments of the Asserted Claims that have been actually or
`
`constructively reduced to practice, all documents and things evidencing such conception, reduction
`
`to practice (whether actual or constructive), and diligence, each person (including, but not limited
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:
`3258
`
`
`to, persons working for or with Plaintiff) involved in such conception, diligence, and/or reduction
`
`to practice, each person’s role (e.g., producer, developer, tester, technician, researcher, etc.), the
`
`subject matter to which each person contributed, and the dates and places each such person
`
`assisted, supervised, or was otherwise so involved.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 3
`
`For each Asserted Claim, identify and describe all facts related to when the claimed
`
`invention, in whole or in part, was publicly disclosed, demonstrated, used, sold, given away, or
`
`offered for sale (and if offered for sale, under what terms).
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 4
`
`For each Asserted Claim, identify and describe all facts that support or contradict any
`
`secondary considerations of non-obviousness (also known as objective indicia), including, without
`
`limitation, any alleged long-felt but unfulfilled need, failure of others, commercial success,
`
`commercial acquiescence, licensing, professional approval, lack of contemporaneous invention,
`
`copying, and laudatory statements by others, and nexus between the merits of the claimed
`
`invention and the evidence of secondary indicia, including without limitation an identification of
`
`any supporting documents.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 5
`
`Identify and describe in detail all agreements, offers, or negotiations referencing and/or
`
`granting any permissions under or rights to any of the Asserted Patents or any Counterpart,
`
`including, but not limited to, any assignments, express licenses, alleged licenses, covenants not to
`
`sue or non-assertion agreements, releases, security interests, settlements, or any offers or
`
`negotiations therefor, including identifying all persons or entities that have at any time had or
`
`contended that they had such an agreement, all persons involved in each such agreement, offer, or
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:
`3259
`
`
`negotiation, the circumstances surrounding each agreement, offer, or negotiation, the financial
`
`terms of each agreement, any payments made or received in connection with each agreement, and
`
`all documents sufficient to show the negotiations and final terms of each such agreement, including
`
`any supporting or associated documentation or agreement(s).
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 6
`
`Identify each Person with any direct or indirect financial interest in this Action, describe
`
`the nature of the financial interest, including an identification of all agreements and draft
`
`agreements with said Person relating to the design and testing of applications for mobile phones,
`
`patents, patent applications, licenses, assignments, or this lawsuit, and the relationship of said
`
`Person with Plaintiff. Your answer should include (but not necessarily be limited to) a description
`
`of any funding, financial contribution, or payments made to You for purposes of this Action and
`
`how any money collected from this Action will be distributed, a description of the rights and
`
`obligations of such Person related to any of the Asserted Patents, and identification of any related
`
`documents.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 7
`
`Describe in detail any analysis, determination, or calculation of the value of each of the
`
`Asserted Patents or any Counterpart (whether on the basis of an individual patent or as part of a
`
`group of patents that may or may not include patents other than the Asserted Patents or any
`
`Counterpart, including, but not limited to, Plaintiff’s entire patent portfolio) or attempt thereof by
`
`You or on Your behalf, including, but not limited to, identifying the facts analyzed or considered,
`
`the person(s) involved in the analysis, determination, or calculation, any results of the analysis,
`
`determination, or calculation, and any communication of such results to others.
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:
`3260
`
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 8
`
`Identify and describe in detail all factual bases for Your claim for injunctive relief,
`
`including, but not limited to, any facts showing: that any alleged harm to You caused by alleged
`
`infringement by Defendants are irreparable, that there is a causal nexus between any such alleged
`
`harm and the alleged infringement by Defendants, that money damages are inadequate to
`
`compensate You, that the balance of hardships between You and Defendant favors You, and that
`
`the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction; and all factual bases for Your
`
`decision to not seek a temporary restraining order (TRO) or preliminary injunction in this action.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 9
`
`Describe all facts and circumstances relating to your compliance (or lack thereof) with 35
`
`U.S.C. § 287 with respect to the Asserted Patents, including stating whether You, any prior owners
`
`of the Asserted Patents, and/or any licensees of the Asserted Patents have complied with 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 287, identifying all products made or sold by You or a licensee that practice any claim of an
`
`Asserted Patent, identifying all products made or sold by You or a licensee that have been marked
`
`with an Asserted Patent, identifying the dates over which the products have been marked,
`
`identifying all documents showing any such markings, identifying all efforts or steps taken by You
`
`to ensure that any licensees of the Asserted Patents have complied with 35 U.S.C. § 287, and
`
`identifying people knowledgeable of any such compliance or non-compliance.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 10
`
`Describe all facts and circumstances supporting Your assertion that AGIS is the sole owner
`
`of the Asserted Patents, including any facts demonstrating that Christopher R. Rice did not assign
`
`his interest in any Asserted Patent to Microsoft Corporation prior to any assignment to AGIS.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:
`3261
`
`
`Dated: June 2, 2021
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark N. Reiter
`Mark N. Reiter
`Texas State Bar No. 16759900
`mreiter@gibsondunn.com
`Robert A. Vincent
`Texas State Bar No. 24056474
`rvincent@gibsondunn.com
`Nathan R. Curtis
`Texas State Bar No. 24078390
`ncurtis@gibsondunn.com
`Ashbey N. Morgan
`Texas State Bar No. 24106339
`anmorgan@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 2100
`Dallas, TX 75201-6912
`Telephone: 214.698.3360
`Facsimile: 214.571.2907
`
`
`Melissa R. Smith
`Texas State Bar No. 24001351
`GILLIAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: 90.934.8450
`Facsimile: 903.934.9257
`Email: melissa@gilliamsmithlaw.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Uber
`Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Uber
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:
`3262
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that the foregoing document was served electronically on June 2, 2021, on all
`
`counsel who have consented to electronic service.
`
`/s/ Nathan Curtis
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`