throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:
`3251
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:
`3252
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`v.
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC., AND T-MOBILE
`US, INC.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`v.
`
`UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`d/b/a UBER,
`






`






`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP
`(Lead Case)
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00026-JRG-RSP
`(Member Case)
`
`DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S
`FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`
`Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Uber Technologies,
`
`Inc. (“Uber”) hereby serve its First Set of Interrogatories upon Plaintiff AGIS Software
`
`Development LLC (“Plaintiff” or “AGIS”) to be answered fully, in writing, and under oath within
`
`thirty (30) days of service hereof. These Interrogatories are continuing in nature and require
`
`supplemental responses. The following Definitions and Instructions apply.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`“You,” “Your,” “Plaintiffs,” and/or “AGIS” shall refer to the responding Plaintiff AGIS
`
`Software Development LLC, and any and all of its then-current or prior subsidiaries,
`
`parents, affiliates, divisions, successors, predecessors, agents, employees, representatives,
`
`directors, officers, trustees, and attorneys, or any other person or entity acting in whole or
`
`in part in concert with any of the foregoing, directly or indirectly.
`
`2.
`
`“Employee” shall refer to any officer, director, partner, employee, representative, or agent.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:
`3253
`
`
`3.
`
`“Person” shall refer to any natural person, firm, association, partnership, government
`
`agency, corporation, proprietorship, or other entity and its officers, directors, partners,
`
`employee, representatives, and agents.
`
`4.
`
`“Action(s)” shall refer to the above-captioned proceeding in the United States District
`
`Court for the Eastern District of Texas, with case numbers 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP (Lead
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Case), 2:21-cv-00026-JRG-RSP (Member Case).
`
`“Asserted Patents” shall refer to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,031,728; 7,630,724; 8,213,970;
`
`10,299,100; and 10,34,838.
`
`“Asserted Claim” shall refer to each claim of the Asserted Patents that You assert in this
`
`Action.
`
`“Complaint” shall refer to the Complaint (including exhibits) Plaintiff filed on January 29,
`
`2021.
`
`“Counterpart” shall refer to any and all patents in any country based upon any applications
`
`related in any fashion to the Asserted Patents (or to the corresponding application on which
`
`it was granted), including any counterparts and any patents that may have been opposed,
`
`re-examined, re-issued, or subjected to any validity or nullity proceeding.
`
`9.
`
`“Named Inventor” shall refer to any individual who is listed as an inventor on the Asserted
`
`Patents or any Counterpart thereof.
`
`10.
`
`“Prior Art” encompasses, without limitation, the subject matter described in each and every
`
`subdivision of 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, and includes, but is not limited to, memoranda,
`
`notes, manuals, interviews, testing data, disclosures, prototypes, correspondence,
`
`drawings, papers, articles, patents, printed publications, public uses, demonstrations, offers
`
`for sale or license, and sales.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:
`3254
`
`
`11.
`
`“Communication” shall mean, without limitation, any written, oral, or other transmission
`
`of information.
`
`12.
`
`“Document” shall include, without limitation, all documents, electronically stored
`
`information, and tangible things within the scope of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
`
`including Rule 34.
`
`13.
`
`“Concerning,” “refer to,” “reflecting,” and “relating to” shall mean relating to, referring to,
`
`mentioning, reflecting, pertaining to, evidencing, involving, describing, discussing,
`
`commenting on, embodying, responding to, supporting, contradicting, or constituting (in
`
`whole or in part), as the context makes appropriate.
`
`14.
`
`“Thing” refers to and includes any tangible object other than a document, and includes
`
`objects of every kind and nature including, but not limited to, prototypes, models, and
`
`specimens.
`
`15.
`
`The words “and” and “or” shall be construed conjunctively or disjunctively, whichever
`
`makes the request more inclusive.
`
`16.
`
`Any pronouns shall be construed to refer to the masculine, feminine, or neutral gender, in
`
`singular or plural, as in each case is most appropriate.
`
`The word “each” shall be construed to mean “each and every.”
`
`The words “any” and “all” shall be construed to mean “any and all.”
`
`The singular form of any word shall be construed to also include the plural, and vice-versa.
`
`“Identify” (or “Identification”) in relation to a natural person shall refer to: (a) the person’s
`
`full name and any nicknames; (b) present or last known contact information (including
`
`address, telephone number, and email address); (c) if You are unaware of the person’s
`
`present whereabouts, all information known to You that reasonably may be helpful in
`
`3
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:
`3255
`
`
`locating said person; and (d) whether the person ever has been employed by You—and if
`
`so, his or her current employment position and relevant dates of employment.
`
`21.
`
`“Identify” (or “Identification”) when used with respect to a communication shall refer to
`
`the names of the parties to the communication, the date or approximate date of the
`
`communication, and the substance of the communication, and to list all documents
`
`containing or relating to the communication.
`
`22.
`
`“Identify” (or “Identification”) in relation to a Document shall refer to: (a) the date the
`
`Document was created; (b) the author(s) of the Document; (c) the recipient(s) of the
`
`Document; (d) any person or entity receiving a copy of the Document by “cc,” “bcc,” or
`
`otherwise; (e) a basic description of the nature of the Document, including, if applicable;
`
`(f) the title of the Document; and (g) whether the Document has been or is being produced
`
`in this litigation, the Bates or identifier number affixed to the Document. Documents to be
`
`“identified” include Documents in Plaintiffs’ possession, custody, or control, Documents
`
`known by Plaintiff to have existed but no longer exist, and other Documents of which
`
`Plaintiff has knowledge or information.
`
`
`
`INSTRUCTIONS
`
`The following instructions shall apply to each of the interrogatories herein.
`
`1.
`
`You are required to answer the following interrogatories separately and fully in writing and
`
`under oath, within thirty (30) days from the date of service. When answering the
`
`interrogatories, you are required to furnish such information as is available to you,
`
`including, but not limited to, information known to your officers, employees, agents, or
`
`anyone acting for or on your behalf.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:
`3256
`
`
`2.
`
`If you have no information about the subject of a particular interrogatory, or if for some
`
`other reason you are unable to answer it, the response to that interrogatory should
`
`specifically so state. No interrogatory should be without some response.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`If you cannot answer an interrogatory completely, answer as fully as you can and specify
`
`the ways in which your response may be incomplete because of your lack of knowledge.
`
`If you do not know exact dates, amounts, or other facts with certainty, but you have
`
`information from which you can make an approximate or estimated answer, do so and
`
`indicate if the answer is an approximate or estimate because you lack more precise
`
`information.
`
`5.
`
`Documents produced pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, or in lieu of
`
`answering pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), should be expressly identified
`
`to the interrogatory to which they pertain.
`
`6.
`
`These discovery requests are deemed to be continuing such as to require you to serve
`
`supplemental answers should you learn of additional information, documents, or tangible
`
`things called for by these discovery requests between the time your answers are served and
`
`the time of trial; supplemental answers are required to be served within a reasonable time
`
`after the discovery of such additional information or documents.
`
`7.
`
`If you assert a claim of privilege or work product protection in objecting to any
`
`interrogatory, identify with respect to each communication, document, or tangible thing
`
`the nature and basis of the privilege claimed, and provide as much of the following
`
`information as is not encompassed by the privilege: its type; its general subject matter and
`
`purpose; its date; the names of persons making or receiving the communication, document,
`
`or tangible thing or a copy thereof or, if the communication was oral, the names of those
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:
`3257
`
`
`present when the communication was made; their relationship to the author or speaker; and
`
`any other information needed to determine the applicability of the privilege or protection.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 1
`
`INTERROGATORIES
`
`For each product You allege infringes, describe the circumstances under which Plaintiff
`
`first became aware of the product’s alleged infringement, including, but not limited to, the date(s)
`
`upon which Plaintiff first became aware of the product; the date upon which Plaintiff first became
`
`aware that the product allegedly infringed any claim of the Asserted Patents; any investigations,
`
`reverse engineering, analyses, tests, or studies done on the product by or on behalf of Plaintiff with
`
`respect to possible infringement of any claim of the Asserted Patents, including without limitation
`
`to the date, procedures, and results of such analyses, tests, or studies; and an identification of all
`
`persons involved in any such analyses, tests, or studies and any documents or things that refer or
`
`relate to the subject matter of this interrogatory.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 2
`
`For each Asserted Claim, identify the earliest priority date to which You contend that
`
`Asserted Claim is entitled, including an identification and description of any corroborating
`
`evidence for the circumstances of any claimed conception and reduction to practice of that
`
`Asserted Claim, as well as an identification of the claim’s date of conception, the date of first
`
`actual reduction to practice of the claim, all acts Plaintiff contends represent diligence from
`
`conception to first actual reduction to practice and diligence from conception to constructive
`
`reduction to practice, all embodiments of the Asserted Claims that have been actually or
`
`constructively reduced to practice, all documents and things evidencing such conception, reduction
`
`to practice (whether actual or constructive), and diligence, each person (including, but not limited
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:
`3258
`
`
`to, persons working for or with Plaintiff) involved in such conception, diligence, and/or reduction
`
`to practice, each person’s role (e.g., producer, developer, tester, technician, researcher, etc.), the
`
`subject matter to which each person contributed, and the dates and places each such person
`
`assisted, supervised, or was otherwise so involved.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 3
`
`For each Asserted Claim, identify and describe all facts related to when the claimed
`
`invention, in whole or in part, was publicly disclosed, demonstrated, used, sold, given away, or
`
`offered for sale (and if offered for sale, under what terms).
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 4
`
`For each Asserted Claim, identify and describe all facts that support or contradict any
`
`secondary considerations of non-obviousness (also known as objective indicia), including, without
`
`limitation, any alleged long-felt but unfulfilled need, failure of others, commercial success,
`
`commercial acquiescence, licensing, professional approval, lack of contemporaneous invention,
`
`copying, and laudatory statements by others, and nexus between the merits of the claimed
`
`invention and the evidence of secondary indicia, including without limitation an identification of
`
`any supporting documents.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 5
`
`Identify and describe in detail all agreements, offers, or negotiations referencing and/or
`
`granting any permissions under or rights to any of the Asserted Patents or any Counterpart,
`
`including, but not limited to, any assignments, express licenses, alleged licenses, covenants not to
`
`sue or non-assertion agreements, releases, security interests, settlements, or any offers or
`
`negotiations therefor, including identifying all persons or entities that have at any time had or
`
`contended that they had such an agreement, all persons involved in each such agreement, offer, or
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:
`3259
`
`
`negotiation, the circumstances surrounding each agreement, offer, or negotiation, the financial
`
`terms of each agreement, any payments made or received in connection with each agreement, and
`
`all documents sufficient to show the negotiations and final terms of each such agreement, including
`
`any supporting or associated documentation or agreement(s).
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 6
`
`Identify each Person with any direct or indirect financial interest in this Action, describe
`
`the nature of the financial interest, including an identification of all agreements and draft
`
`agreements with said Person relating to the design and testing of applications for mobile phones,
`
`patents, patent applications, licenses, assignments, or this lawsuit, and the relationship of said
`
`Person with Plaintiff. Your answer should include (but not necessarily be limited to) a description
`
`of any funding, financial contribution, or payments made to You for purposes of this Action and
`
`how any money collected from this Action will be distributed, a description of the rights and
`
`obligations of such Person related to any of the Asserted Patents, and identification of any related
`
`documents.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 7
`
`Describe in detail any analysis, determination, or calculation of the value of each of the
`
`Asserted Patents or any Counterpart (whether on the basis of an individual patent or as part of a
`
`group of patents that may or may not include patents other than the Asserted Patents or any
`
`Counterpart, including, but not limited to, Plaintiff’s entire patent portfolio) or attempt thereof by
`
`You or on Your behalf, including, but not limited to, identifying the facts analyzed or considered,
`
`the person(s) involved in the analysis, determination, or calculation, any results of the analysis,
`
`determination, or calculation, and any communication of such results to others.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:
`3260
`
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 8
`
`Identify and describe in detail all factual bases for Your claim for injunctive relief,
`
`including, but not limited to, any facts showing: that any alleged harm to You caused by alleged
`
`infringement by Defendants are irreparable, that there is a causal nexus between any such alleged
`
`harm and the alleged infringement by Defendants, that money damages are inadequate to
`
`compensate You, that the balance of hardships between You and Defendant favors You, and that
`
`the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction; and all factual bases for Your
`
`decision to not seek a temporary restraining order (TRO) or preliminary injunction in this action.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 9
`
`Describe all facts and circumstances relating to your compliance (or lack thereof) with 35
`
`U.S.C. § 287 with respect to the Asserted Patents, including stating whether You, any prior owners
`
`of the Asserted Patents, and/or any licensees of the Asserted Patents have complied with 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 287, identifying all products made or sold by You or a licensee that practice any claim of an
`
`Asserted Patent, identifying all products made or sold by You or a licensee that have been marked
`
`with an Asserted Patent, identifying the dates over which the products have been marked,
`
`identifying all documents showing any such markings, identifying all efforts or steps taken by You
`
`to ensure that any licensees of the Asserted Patents have complied with 35 U.S.C. § 287, and
`
`identifying people knowledgeable of any such compliance or non-compliance.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 10
`
`Describe all facts and circumstances supporting Your assertion that AGIS is the sole owner
`
`of the Asserted Patents, including any facts demonstrating that Christopher R. Rice did not assign
`
`his interest in any Asserted Patent to Microsoft Corporation prior to any assignment to AGIS.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:
`3261
`
`
`Dated: June 2, 2021
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark N. Reiter
`Mark N. Reiter
`Texas State Bar No. 16759900
`mreiter@gibsondunn.com
`Robert A. Vincent
`Texas State Bar No. 24056474
`rvincent@gibsondunn.com
`Nathan R. Curtis
`Texas State Bar No. 24078390
`ncurtis@gibsondunn.com
`Ashbey N. Morgan
`Texas State Bar No. 24106339
`anmorgan@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 2100
`Dallas, TX 75201-6912
`Telephone: 214.698.3360
`Facsimile: 214.571.2907
`
`
`Melissa R. Smith
`Texas State Bar No. 24001351
`GILLIAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: 90.934.8450
`Facsimile: 903.934.9257
`Email: melissa@gilliamsmithlaw.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Uber
`Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Uber
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 133-2 Filed 08/24/21 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:
`3262
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that the foregoing document was served electronically on June 2, 2021, on all
`
`counsel who have consented to electronic service.
`
`/s/ Nathan Curtis
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket