Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:
`2997
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2997
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:
`2998
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`“application software
`’970 Patent at Abstract;
`that allows an
`3:29-40; 3:41-51; 4:47-
`operator to create
`59; 7:8-42; 7:43-8:15;
`and transmit message
`8:16-52; 8:65-9:39;
`alerts”
`10:7-41
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`1. a forced message alert
`software application
`program / a forced
`message alert software
`application
`
`’970:1, 2, 10, 11,
`12
`
`2. manual response
`
`’970:2
`
`“recipient-selectable
`response message”
`
`’970 Patent at Abstract;
`1:15-23; 2:7-59; 7:43-
`8:15; 8:16-52; 8:65-9:39;
`10:7-41
`
`’970:1
`
`3. a data transmission
`means that facilitates the
`transmission of electronic
`files between said
`PDA/cell phones in
`different locations
`
`’970 Patent at 1:39-43;
`2:36-48; 3:52-67; 4:1-
`36; 7:43-8:15; Figs. 1, 2,
`3A, 3B, and 4; Claims 1-
`13
`
`Governed by § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Function:
`“facilitating the
`transmission of
`electronic files
`between said
`
`1
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Huawei Device USA Inc. et al.,
`No. 2:17-cv-00513-JRG, Dkt.
`205 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2018)
`and all associated briefing and
`filings.
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Huawei Device USA Inc. et al.,
`No. 2:17-cv-00513-JRG, Dkt.
`205 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2018)
`and all associated briefing and
`filings.
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Huawei Device USA Inc. et al.,
`No. 2:17-cv-00513-JRG, Dkt.
`205 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2018);
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Google LLC, No. 2:19-cv-
`00361-JRG, Dkt. 147 (E.D. Tex.
`Dec. 8, 2020); and all associated
`briefing and filings.
`
`
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`’970:2
`
`4. means for allowing a
`manual response to be
`manually selected from
`the response list or
`manually recorded and
`transmitting said manual
`response to the sender
`PDA/cell phone
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Google LLC, No. 2:19-cv-
`00361-JRG, Dkt. 147 (E.D. Tex.
`Dec. 8, 2020); and all associated
`briefing and filings.
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:
`2999
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`PDA/cell phones in
`different locations”
`
`Structure:
`communications
`network server; and
`equivalents thereof”
`Governed by 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Function: “allowing
`a manual response to
`be manually selected
`from the response list
`or manually recorded
`and transmitting said
`manual response to
`the sender PDA/cell
`phone”
`
`Structure:
`“PDA/cell phone
`configured to
`implement the
`algorithm disclosed
`in the ’970 patent at
`7:43-63, 8:9-57; and
`equivalents thereof”
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’970 Patent at 1:19-23;
`1:51-67; 2:7-34; 2:49-
`55; 8:9-51; Figs. 3A, 3B,
`4.
`
`5. similarly equipped
`PDA/cell phone
`
`’970:1
`
`
`
`’724 Patent at 2:48-3:28;
`4:24-7:47; 11:16-35;
`11:39-58; 15:50-16:10;
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`
`2
`
`
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`6. required response list
`
`’970:10
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:
`3000
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`Figs. 1, 2, 3; Claims 1, 3,
`9, 16.
`
`’728 Patent at 3:44-56;
`3:62-6:33; 7:17-60;
`10:40-61; Figs. 1, 2.
`
`’970 Patent at 3:22-40;
`4:12-27; 7:8-16; Figs.
`1a, 1b.
`’970 Patent at Abstract,
`Figs. 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 2:7-
`35; 2:49-55; 3:22-28;
`7:8-42; 7:43-8:15; 8:16-
`57; Claims 1-13.
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Google LLC, No. 2:19-cv-
`00361-JRG, Dkt. 147 (E.D. Tex.
`Dec. 8, 2020); and all associated
`briefing and filings.
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`’970:10
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’970 Patent at 7:17-31;
`8:37-57; Fig. 4.
`
`7. transmitting a selected
`required response from
`the response list in order
`to allow the message
`required response list to
`be clear from the
`recipient’s cell phone
`display
`8. each PDA/cell phone
`within a predetermined
`
`’970:11
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’724 Patent at 2:48-3:28;
`4:24-7:47; 11:16-35;
`11:39-58; 15:50-16:10;
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:
`3001
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`Figs. 1, 2, 3; Claims 1, 3,
`9, 16.
`
`’728 Patent at 3:44-56;
`3:62-6:33; 7:17-60;
`10:40-61; Figs. 1, 2.
`
`’970 Patent at 3:22-40;
`4:12-27; 7:8-16; Figs.
`1a, 1b.
`’970 Patent at Abstract,
`Figs. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4;
`2:3-35; 2:49-55; 3:22-
`40; 4:12-7:7; 7:8-42;
`7:43-8:15; 8:16-57;
`Claims 1-13.
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`communication network
`is similarly equipped
`
`9. [a] method of receiving,
`acknowledging, and
`responding to a forced
`message alert from a
`sender PDA/cell phone to
`a recipient PDA/cell
`phone
`10. SMS / short message
`service (SMS) messages
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`’970:10
`
`Preamble is not
`limiting.
`
`
`
`’724:9
`
`’055: 3, 12, 31
`
`’251: 7, 30
`
`“cellular based
`messages of limited
`size consisting of
`text and numbers”
`
`’838 Patent at 5:50-61;
`9:40-46; 13:61-67
`
`’728 Patent at 1:36-44;
`5:55-64; 6:7-19; 6:34-
`36; 7:41-45.
`
`’724 Patent at Abstract;
`1:39-42; 3:29-31; 4:52-
`65; 9:6-22; 9:31-47;
`12:12-62; 13:31-45;
`Figs. 4, 6.
`
`
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Huawei Device USA Inc. et al.,
`No. 2:17-cv-00513-JRG, Dkt.
`205 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2018);
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Google LLC, No. 2:19-cv-
`00361-JRG, Dkt. 147 (E.D. Tex.
`Dec. 8, 2020); and all associated
`briefing and filings.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`11. providing a cellular
`phone communication
`network for designated
`participating users
`
`12. similarly equipped
`cellular phone
`
`13. said database including
`the generation of one or
`more symbols associated
`with a particular
`participating users
`
`14. accessing an application
`program in each cell
`phone for generating one
`or more symbols
`representative of one or
`more participating users,
`
`
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:
`3002
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`’055 Patent at 5:21-6:3;
`9;14-26; 9:34-58; 11:14-
`16; 13:50-60; Claims 1-
`54.
`’724 Patent at Abstract;
`2:48-3:28; 3:47-63;
`9:31-47; 10:23-56;
`11:16-35; 12:12-62;
`19:35-50; Claims 1, 10-
`16
`’724 Patent at 2:48-3:28;
`4:24-7:47; 11:16-35;
`11:39-58; 15:50-16:10;
`Figs. 1, 2, 3; Claims 1, 3,
`9, 16.
`
`’728 Patent at 3:44-56;
`3:62-6:33; 7:17-60;
`10:40-61; Figs. 1, 2.
`’724 Patent at Abstract;
`4:24-5:8; 5:51-67; 7:28-
`8:48; 13:46-14:27;
`14:60-49; 15:19-49;
`17:63-18:32; 19:56-41;
`Fig. 3
`’724 Patent at 3:36-46;
`4:24-5:8; 6:44-59;
`14:60-15:18; 16:11-41;
`Fig. 3.
`
`’724:9
`
`’724:9
`
`’728: 7
`
`’724:9
`
`’724:9
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:
`3003
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`each of whom have a
`similarly equipped
`cellular phone
`15. using the IP address
`previously
`
`’724:9
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`16. similarly equipped PDA
`cellular phone
`
`’724:16
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`17. map display
`
`’724:9
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’728: 7
`
`18. each representing a
`different participant that
`has a cellular phone that
`includes said voice
`communication, free and
`operator selected text
`messages, photograph
`and video, a CPU, said
`GPS system and a touch
`screen display
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`(subject to AGIS’s
`proposed
`construction for the
`term “free and
`operator selected text
`messages”)
`
`6
`
`’724 Patent at 3:29-31;
`5:51-67; 6:24-43; 7:48-
`8:10; 10:9-22; 10:57-
`11:15; 12:63-13:6;
`16:42-59.
`
`’728 Patent at 6:5-28.
`’724 Patent at 2:48-3:28;
`4:24-7:47; 11:16-35;
`11:44-58; 15:50-16:10;
`Figs. 1, 2, 3; Claims 1, 3,
`15, 16.
`’724 Patent at 2:48-3:24;
`5:16-50; 6:24-7:24;
`8:23-48; 13:46-51;
`16:11-41; 18:57-19:7;
`Figs. 1, 2, 3.
`’728 Patent at 4:25-43;
`4:52-56, 5:9-6:4; 6:56-
`60; 11:38-55; Fig. 3.
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:
`3004
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`“messages
`’728 Patent at 4:25-43;
`comprising free text”
`5:9-6:4; 6:56-60; 11:38-
`55; Fig. 3.
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`19. free and operator selected
`text messages
`
`’728:7
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`
`20. establishing a cellular
`phone communication
`network for designated
`participants
`
`21. providing initiating
`cellular phone calling
`software in each cellular
`phone that is activated by
`touching a symbol on the
`touch display that
`automatically initiates a
`cellular phone call using
`the stored cellular phone
`number to the participant
`represented by the
`symbol
`22. consisting of: a position
`of the participant symbol,
`positions of the one or
`more vehicle symbols,
`and a portion of the map
`displayed on the display
`of the mobile device
`
`’728:7
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’728: 7
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’728 Patent at 3:62-5:8;
`5:21-54; 5:55-6:4; 6:5-
`33; 6:34-46; 8:35-9:11;
`9:11-35; 10:12-31;
`10:40-61; 11:43-55; Fig.
`3
`’728 Patent 2:18-54;
`3:24-43; 3:62-5:8; 5:9-
`20; 6:5-28; 7:17-60;
`7:61-9:11; 9:12-51;
`10:40-61; 11:10-36; Fig.
`3.
`
`
`
`’100:4
`
`Plain and Ordinary
`Meaning
`
`’100 Patent at 2:62-3:19;
`6:62-7:11; 7:35-8:6;
`Claims 1, 5, 7, 9, 11-15,
`20, 24, 25, 27-31.
`
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Google LLC, No. 2:19-cv-
`00361-JRG, Dkt. 147 (E.D. Tex.
`Dec. 8, 2020).
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:
`3005
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`Plain and ordinary
`’100 Patent at 9:52-67.
`meaning
`
`’100:7
`
`23. based on at least one
`criterion selected from
`the group consisting of:
`(1) passage of time, and
`(2) movement of the first
`vehicle
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`AGIS Software Dev. LLC v.
`Google LLC, No. 2:19-cv-
`00361-JRG, Dkt. 147 (E.D. Tex.
`Dec. 8, 2020).
`
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`AGIS may rely on the expert
`testimony of Mr. Joseph C.
`McAlexander in connection
`with this claim term.
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`24. event/event symbol
`
`’100:20
`
`’838:11, 24
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’100 Patent at 7:55-8:6;
`13:13-25
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`10,341,838: 1, 14
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`10,341,838 at 3:22-34;
`3:53-4:22; 5:30-34;
`11:27-41.
`
`25. based on the participant
`selection data,
`performing one or more
`acts selected from the
`group consisting of:
`sending updated vehicle
`data to the first mobile
`device corresponding to
`the vehicle, sending
`updated participant data
`to the second mobile
`device corresponding to
`the participant, and
`sending a message to the
`first mobile device
`corresponding to the
`vehicle
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 124-3 Filed 08/17/21 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:
`3006
`EXHIBIT C – Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Proposed Constructions
`to Defendants Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc.
`Patent/Claims
`AGIS’s Proposed
`Additional Intrinsic
`Construction
`Evidence
`Plain and ordinary
`U.S. Patent No.
`meaning
`10,341,838 at 8:9-45.
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`10,341,838: 1, 14
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term/Phrase
`
`26. receiving entity-of-
`interest data transmitted
`by the second mobile
`device, the entity-of-
`interest data comprising
`coordinates of a
`geographical location of
`a new entity of interest
`27. obtaining first data
`provided by a first mobile
`device corresponding to a
`vehicle, the first data
`including a first identifier
`28. obtaining second data
`provided by a second
`mobile device
`corresponding to a
`participant, the second
`data including a second
`identifier associated with
`the participant
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`10,341,838: 1, 14
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`10,341,838: 1, 14
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`10,341,838 at 2:64-3:21;
`9:21-67; 11:1-26.
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`10,341,838 at 2:64-3:21;
`9:21-67; 11:1-26.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
