throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 122-1 Filed 08/13/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 2958
`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 122-1 Filed 08/13/21 Page 1 of 3 PagelD #: 2958
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 122-1 Filed 08/13/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 2959
`
`August 13, 2021
`
`VIA EMAIL (LISA.NGUYEN@LW.COM)
`
`
`
`
`Lisa K. Nguyen, Esq.
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`140 Scott Drive
`Menlo Park, California 94025
`
`
`Re:
`
`
`AGIS Software Development LLC v. WhatsApp, Inc.,
`Case No 2:21-cv-00029-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.)
`
`
`Counsel:
`
`In accordance with the parties’ agreements during the August 12, 2021 conference call with the
`Court regarding venue discovery, we write to follow up on the scope of AGIS’s August 9, 2021
`venue discovery requests. As ordered by the Court, this writing is intended to clarify and narrow
`the scope of AGIS’s August 9, 2021 venue discovery requests.
`
`AGIS expects WhatsApp will produce, on a timely basis, documents and things from at least the
`categories set forth below, whether electronically stored or otherwise, that are in the possession,
`custody, or control of WhatsApp and its affiliates. By identifying the following exemplary
`categories of documents for production, AGIS does not waive any right under the Federal Rules
`of Civil Procedure and/or the Eastern District of Texas Local Rules and/or Patent Rules, or any
`other applicable rules. AGIS reserves the right to seek additional discovery including, but not
`limited to, third-party discovery, based on the information produced responsive to AGIS’s venue
`discovery requests.
`
`As per the parties’ agreement, AGIS seeks discovery on each category below based on the
`temporal scope of 2017 to present and the geographical scope of all counties within the Eastern
`District of Texas and all counties adjacent to the Eastern District of Texas (“EDTX”). This
`agreement was made with the understanding that Defendant will not exclude from discovery any
`information from third parties solely based on their purported residence outside of the District.
`For example, Defendant will not exclude discovery on physical locations of or agreements with
`data center, server, or colocation providers (e.g., Kansas-based QTS with locations within and
`adjacent to EDTX) or coworking or shared office space providers (e.g., New York-based
`WeWork with locations within and adjacent to EDTX) solely because the providers’ principal
`place of business is outside of the agreed geographical scope. These examples are not intended
`to be limiting in any form.
`
`FABRICANT LLP | FABRICANTLLP.COM | 411 THEODORE FREMD AVE., SUITE 206 SOUTH, RYE, NY 10580 | 212.257.5797
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00072-JRG-RSP Document 122-1 Filed 08/13/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 2960
`
`
`
`Lisa K. Nguyen, Esq.
`August 13, 2021
`Page 2
`
`
`AGIS hereby requests that WhatsApp produce:
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`Documents sufficient to identify all physical property, offices, facilities, coworking
`spaces, warehouses, tangible and intangible property, equipment, servers, data centers,
`and other physical locations located in the EDTX and the counties adjacent to the EDTX,
`that are leased, owned, or otherwise used by WhatsApp, any affiliate of WhatsApp, or
`any employees, consultants, or any personnel of WhatsApp.
`
`All agreements, leases, contracts, and any legal rights for all physical property, offices,
`facilities, coworking spaces, warehouses, tangible and intangible property, equipment,
`servers, data centers, other physical locations, communications services, utility services,
`and all vendor services located or performed in the EDTX and the counties adjacent to
`the EDTX;
`
`Documents sufficient to identify employees, officers, directors, contractors, vendors,
`agents, and third parties of WhatsApp and its affiliate, including, but not limited to, all
`Person(s) that reside or work in the EDTX and in the counties adjacent to the EDTX.
`Plaintiff agrees that Defendant does not need to provide the full home address. Plaintiff
`requests that, for each individual, Defendant provide at least: the individual’s title,
`organization, and responsibilities; the city and county of residence of the individual; the
`full addresses of any office locations; any agreements to reimburse or otherwise provide
`payment for office space, equipment, utilities, and services; and any agreements and
`conditions of individual’s employment.
`
`(4)
`
`All agreements, contracts, and documents related to all business, services, transactions,
`and work delivered or performed for any customers, by or on behalf of WhatsApp and its
`affiliates, in the EDTX and in the counties adjacent to the EDTX.
`
`Further, AGIS maintains its request that WhatsApp identify and produce for deposition one or
`more witnesses knowledgeable to testify regarding the venue discovery sought in this
`correspondence and in AGIS’s Interrogatories Nos. 10-13, served concurrently with this
`correspondence.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`
`FABRICANT LLP | FABRICANTLLP.COM | 411 THEODORE FREMD AVE., SUITE 206 SOUTH, RYE, NY 10580 | 212.257.5797
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket