throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 85 Filed 09/28/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2061
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00040-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00041-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`











`
` §
`
`










`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY
`PARTNERS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY
`PARTNERS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO FILE
`RESPONSE
`
`
`
`Pursuant to L.R. CV-7(e), Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc. (“Defendants” or “Samsung”) hereby move the Court to shorten the time
`
`for Plaintiff Gesture Technology Partners, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “GTP”) to respond to Defendants’
`
`accompanying Motion for a Protective Order.
`
`On September 8 and 14, 2021, GTP served discovery requests containing interrogatories
`
`and deposition topics, respectively, that purport to impose substantial undue burden and expense
`
`on Samsung (the “Discovery Requests”). Specifically, the Discovery Requests purport to require,
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 85 Filed 09/28/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 2062
`
`inter alia, that Samsung provide for deposition what Samsung estimates to be an additional 13
`
`Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses to discuss software applications related to the Accused Products that, by
`
`GTP’s own admissions, are at most negligibly relevant to this case and are not a part of GTP’s
`
`infringement theories. See, e.g., Dkt. 57 at 1.
`
`The parties met and conferred on September 24 and 28, 2021 in an attempt to resolve the
`
`issues related to the Discovery Requests, but no resolution was reached and the parties are at an
`
`impasse, thus necessitating Samsung’s present motion. A shortened briefing schedule is warranted
`
`with the close of fact discovery set to occur on October 15, 2021 and depositions of Samsung
`
`corporate representatives beginning this week.
`
`
`
`THEREFORE, Samsung respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order that Plaintiff’s
`
`response to Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order shall be filed on October 1, 2021.
`
`
`
`DATED: September 28, 2021
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /s/ Christopher W. Kennerly
`Christopher W. Kennerly (TX Bar No. 00795077)
`chriskennerly@paulhastings.com
`Radhesh Devendran (pro hac vice)
`radheshdevendran@paulhastings.com
`Boris S. Lubarsky (pro hac vice)
`borislubarsky@paulhastings.com
`David M. Fox (pro hac vice)
`davidfox@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 320-1800
`Facsimile: (650) 320-1900
`
`Allan M. Soobert
`allansoobert@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`2050 M Street NW
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone: 202-551-1700
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 85 Filed 09/28/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 2063
`
`Facsimile: 202-551-1705
`
`Elizabeth L. Brann
`elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`4747 Executive Drive, 12th Floor
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 458-3000
`Facsimile: (858) 458-3005
`
`Robert Laurenzi
`robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: (212) 318-6000
`Facsimile: (212) 319-4090
`
`Melissa R. Smith (TX Bar No. 24001351)
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 S. Washington Ave.
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics
`Co., Ltd and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`Pursuant to Local Rules CV-7(h) and (i), counsel for the Defendants met and conferred
`
`
`
`
`
`with counsel for the Plaintiff on September 28, 2021 in a good faith attempt to resolve the issues
`
`raised by this motion. Plaintiff confirmed that it opposes the relief requested by this motion. Thus,
`
`these meet and confer efforts have conclusively ended in an impasse and leave an open issue for
`
`the Court to resolve.
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Christopher W. Kennerly
`Christopher W. Kennerly
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 85 Filed 09/28/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 2064
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed
`
`electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5 on September 28, 2021. As of this date, all
`
`counsel of record had consented to electronic service and are being served with a copy of this
`
`document through the Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).
`
`
`
` /s/ Christopher W. Kennerly
`Christopher W. Kennerly
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket