`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 76-2 Filed 09/17/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1686
`
`Fox, David M.
`"fwilliams@wsltrial.com"; "alivingston@wsltrial.com"; "tlandis@wsltrial.com"; "msimons@wsltrial.com"; "johnw@wsltrial.com"; "gtpcounselwsl@wsltrial.com";
`"Daniel Garza"
`Team Samsung GTP; "Melissa Smith"; "Bryan Clark"; "Kent E. Baldauf Jr."; "Phyllis M. Taranto"; "Mark Mann"; "Blake Thompson"; "Matt Warren"; "Warren
`Lex Project Buckeye"
`RE: Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al., 2:21-cv-0040-JRG -- Supplementing Contentions
`Friday, September 17, 2021 1:53:42 PM
`image001.png
`
`From:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Counsel,
`
` I
`
` am writing once again to follow-up on the emails below. Please advise today whether GTP opposes Defendants’ proposed
`supplementation. Defendants plan to file their motion today, as stated in our previous emails, and would like to do so unopposed. If
`we do not hear from you, however, we will count GTP as opposed.
`
`Thank you,
`David
`
`From: Fox, David M.
`Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 12:17 PM
`To: 'fwilliams@wsltrial.com' <fwilliams@wsltrial.com>; 'alivingston@wsltrial.com' <alivingston@wsltrial.com>; 'tlandis@wsltrial.com'
`<tlandis@wsltrial.com>; 'msimons@wsltrial.com' <msimons@wsltrial.com>; 'johnw@wsltrial.com' <johnw@wsltrial.com>;
`'gtpcounselwsl@wsltrial.com' <gtpcounselwsl@wsltrial.com>; 'Daniel Garza' <dgarza@wsltrial.com>
`Cc: Team Samsung GTP <TeamSamsungGTP@paulhastings.com>; 'Melissa Smith' <melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com>; 'Bryan Clark'
`<bclark@webblaw.com>; 'Kent E. Baldauf Jr.' <kbaldaufjr@webblaw.com>; 'Phyllis M. Taranto' <PTaranto@webblaw.com>; 'Mark
`Mann' <mark@themannfirm.com>; 'Blake Thompson' <blake@themannfirm.com>; 'Matt Warren' <matt@warrenlex.com>; 'Warren
`Lex Project Buckeye' <buckeye@matters.warrenlex.com>
`Subject: RE: Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al., 2:21-cv-0040-JRG -- Supplementing Contentions
`
`Counsel,
`
` I
`
` am writing to follow-up on the email below. Please advise whether GTP opposes Defendants’ proposed supplementation.
`Defendants plan to file their motion on Friday, September 17, and hope to do so unopposed. If we do not hear from you, we will
`note as much in the motion.
`
`Thank you,
`David
`
`
`From: Fox, David M.
`Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 10:33 AM
`To: fwilliams@wsltrial.com; alivingston@wsltrial.com; tlandis@wsltrial.com; msimons@wsltrial.com; johnw@wsltrial.com;
`gtpcounselwsl@wsltrial.com; Daniel Garza <dgarza@wsltrial.com>
`Cc: Team Samsung GTP <TeamSamsungGTP@paulhastings.com>; 'Melissa Smith' <melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com>; 'Bryan Clark'
`<bclark@webblaw.com>; 'Kent E. Baldauf Jr.' <kbaldaufjr@webblaw.com>; Phyllis M. Taranto <PTaranto@webblaw.com>; 'Mark
`Mann' <mark@themannfirm.com>; 'Blake Thompson' <blake@themannfirm.com>; 'Matt Warren' <matt@warrenlex.com>; 'Warren
`Lex Project Buckeye' <buckeye@matters.warrenlex.com>
`Subject: Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al., 2:21-cv-0040-JRG -- Supplementing Contentions
`
`Counsel,
`
`Defendants will seek the Court’s leave to supplement their Invalidity & Subject-Matter Eligibility Contentions (“Contentions”), served
`July 6, 2021.
`
`As you are aware, Defendants’ Contentions disclosed, among others, two prior art systems: (1) TV Controller Using Hand Gestures
`and Related Interactive Computer Graphics Applications (“MERL”), and (2) 3D Image Control with Hand Gestures, including Control of
`Molecular Biology Modeling (“MDScope”). As you are also aware, Defendants subpoenaed documents from Mitsubishi Electric
`Research Laboratories, Inc. (creator of the MERL system) and the Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
`(creator of the MDScope system).
`
`In response, Mitsubishi Labs produced a video, which we served on September 2, that provides additional background and support
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 76-2 Filed 09/17/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1687
`
`for the disclosed MERL system. In addition, the Beckman Institute produced the six publications, which we served on August 25, that
`provide additional background and support for the disclosed MDScope system. Although Defendants believe their Contentions
`served July 6 are entirely sufficient with respect to these prior art systems and do not require supplementation, out of an abundance
`of caution Defendants will seek leave to supplement their Contentions with this additional background and supporting evidence. For
`your reference, you will receive a link in a separate email to download the video clip and six publications.
`
`Defendants’ proposed supplementation to their Contentions will be included in the separate link for download, with changes shown
`in redline. Please let us know as soon as possible (but no later than Wednesday, September 15) whether GTP will oppose
`Defendants’ motion for leave.
`
`Thank you,
`David
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`David M. Fox | Associate, Litigation Department
`Paul Hastings LLP | 1117 S. California Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304 | Direct: +1.650.320.1823 |
`Main: +1.650.320.1800 | Fax: +1.650.320.1923 | davidfox@paulhastings.com |
`www.paulhastings.com
`
`