throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 54-3 Filed 07/14/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 794
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 54-3 Filed 07/14/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 794
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 54-3 Filed 07/14/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 795
`
`
`
`
`
`
`May 19, 2021
`
`
`VIA E-MAIL
`
`Fred Williams
`Williams Simons & Landis PLLC
`327 Congress Ave., Suite 490
`Austin, TX 78701
`
`
`Re:
`
`Gesture Technology Partners LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. LTD., et al., Plaintiff’s Disclosure
`of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions
`
`Counsel:
`
`On behalf of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (together,
`
`“Samsung”), we write to follow up on our letter of May 7, 2021 regarding certain additional deficiencies in
`GTP’s infringement contentions.
`
`At least two of the Accused Features identified by GTP in its infringement contentions appear to be
`
`features of products sold by other companies. For example, for Claim 27 of the ’431 Patent, GTP identifies
`websites describing Google’s Motion Sense technology, which was released only on the Google Pixel 4
`series, not on Samsung phones nor on Android phones generally. See ’431 Patent claim chart at 21 (citing
`https://venturebeat.com/2019/10/21/googles-motion-sense-hands-on-controlling-games-and-apps-with-
`gestures/ (“Google’s Motion Sense hands-on: Controlling games and apps with gestures … After a little
`over four years in development, Soli emerged in the Pixel 4 series as the gesture-detecting Motion Sense.
`… The Pixel 4 series implementation is a bit more conservative than that used in onstage demos to date,
`for better or worse. … Swiping a finger above the Pixel 4’s or Pixel 4 XL’s screen prompts a reaction from
`one of five selectable Pokémon, while an upward swipe reveals a dashboard with each one’s height, weight,
`type, and ability stats. …”)). Please confirm that GTP will promptly withdraw all infringement allegations
`with respect to Google’s Motion Sense technology, including dropping its allegations as to Claim 27 of the
`’431 Patent, which relies solely on Google’s Motion Sense technology.
`
`Similarly, the Smile Shutter feature appears to be a feature of Sony cameras, not Samsung phones
`
`nor Android phones generally.1 Please confirm that GTP will promptly withdraw all infringement allegations
`with respect to the Smile Shutter feature.
`
`
`We also note that GTP’s complaint identifies the “Galaxy M Series,” yet none of the 35 Accused
`Products are from the M Series. Please confirm that GTP will promptly withdraw all infringement allegations
`with respect to the Galaxy M series.
`
`Finally, GTP accuses at least two products—the Samsung Metro 360 and Samsung Xcover 550—
`that it concedes do not have two cameras or a light source, and thus cannot meet the claims of at least the
`
`1 See
`https://www.google.com/search?q=%22smile+shutter%22&rlz=1C1GCEJ_enUS844US844&oq=%22smil
`e+shutter%22&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j0j0i22i30l3.2014j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 54-3 Filed 07/14/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 796
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 54-3 Filed 07/14/21 Page 3 of 3 PagelD #: 796
`
`PAUL
`
`HASTINGS
`
`Fred Williams
`
`May 19, 2021
`Page 2
`
`’924. '079, and ‘949 Patents. Please confirm that GTF' is not alleging infringement of any of these patents
`with respect to these two products.
`
`As noted previously, Samsung would strongly prefer to resolve these issues without seeking the
`Court’s assistance. We look forward to meeting and conferring with you this afternoon regarding the issues
`raised in our letters.
`
`Regards.
`
`5/ f-..
`
`Chris Kennerly
`of PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket