`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00040-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00041-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
` §
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY
`PARTNERS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY
`PARTNERS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND/OR COMPEL INFRINGEMENT
`CONTENTIONS COMPLYING WITH THE COURT’S PATENT RULES
`
`Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Infringement Contentions and/or Compel Infringement
`
`Contentions Complying with the Court’s Patent Rules.
`
`Having considered the briefing and arguments of the parties, the Court finds that
`
`Defendants’ motion is well taken and is hereby GRANTED. GTP is ordered to supplement its
`
`Amended Infringement Contentions to comply with Patent Rule 3-1(c), by providing reasonable
`
`notice of GTP’s theory of infringement for each Accused Feature as used by the Accused Products.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 51-10 Filed 06/29/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 667
`
`
`
`The Court strikes all allegations as to newly-added Samsung products for which GTP has not
`
`obtained the requisite leave of Court and non-Samsung Accused Features.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`