throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 34-3 Filed 05/18/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 353
`
`Exhibit 6
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 97 PageID #: 816Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 34-3 Filed 05/18/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 354
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:16-cv-00693-JRG
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`ALACRITECH, INC., a California corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TIER 3, INC., a Washington corporation,
`SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORP., a
`Missouri corporation,
`CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATIONS LLC, a
`Louisiana corporation,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`In this action for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271, Plaintiff Alacritech, Inc.
`
`("Alacritech"), by and through its undersigned counsel, complains and alleges as follows against
`
`Defendants Tier 3, Inc., Savvis Communications Corp., and CenturyLink Communications LLC,
`
`based on Alacritech's own personal knowledge with respect to its own actions and upon
`
`information and belief with respect to others' actions:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Alacritech is a California corporation with its principal place of business at P.O.
`
`Box 20307, San Jose, California 95160.
`
`2.
`
`Tier 3, Inc. is a Washington corporation with its principal place of business at
`
`1120 112th Ave NE, Ste. 200, Bellevue, Washington 98004-4505.
`
`3.
`
`Savvis Communications Corp. is a Missouri corporation with its principal place of
`
`business at 1 Savvis Parkway, Town & Country, Missouri 63017.
`
`06973-00001/8291414.2
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/26/16 Page 12 of 97 PageID #: 827Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 34-3 Filed 05/18/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 355
`
`demand-with-centurylink.pdf; "CenturyLink
`
`- Texas DIR Price List," available at
`
`http://www.centurylink.com/business/texas/pdf/nortel-platforms-msrp-dir-sdd-1472-
`
`pr130199.pdf.
`
`35.
`
`A large and growing portion of CenturyLink's revenue is tied to the infringing
`
`data centers and the products and services described above. Without the benefit of Alacritech's
`
`patented technologies, the infringing data centers and services that CenturyLink operates and
`
`provides would cost substantially more and/or suffer a significant degradation in performance,
`
`hurting CenturyLink's business as a result.
`
`COUNT I
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,124,205
`
`36.
`
`Alacritech re-alleges and incorporates by reference each of the allegations of the
`
`paragraphs set forth above as though fully set forth herein.
`
`37.
`
`Alacritech is the current exclusive owner and assignee of all right, title, and
`
`interest in and to U.S. Patent No. 7,124,205 (the "'205 patent"), titled "Network Interface Device
`
`that Fast-Path Processes Solicited Session Layer Read Commands," duly and legally issued by
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 17, 2006, including the right to bring
`
`this suit for injunctive relief and damages. A true and correct copy of the '205 patent is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`The '205 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`CenturyLink has directly infringed and is currently directly infringing the '205
`
`patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing into the United States,
`
`without authority, products, methods, equipment, and/or services that practice one or more
`
`claims of the '205 patent in connection with infringing RSC, InfiniBand and/or RoCE
`
`functionality, including but not limited to as a part of operating its data centers; as a part of
`
`06973-00001/8291414.2
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/26/16 Page 18 of 97 PageID #: 833Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 34-3 Filed 05/18/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 356
`
`
`
`41.
`
`As of no later than the filing and service of the first-filed complaint in Alacritech
`
`Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00693-JRG (E.D. Tex. first filed June 30, 2016), Dkt. 1
`
`(hereinafter, the “Original Complaint”), CenturyLink is also indirectly infringing the '205 patent.
`
`42.
`
`CenturyLink has actual knowledge of Alacritech's rights in the '205 patent and
`
`details of CenturyLink's infringement of the '205 patent based on at least the filing and service of
`
`the Original Complaint.
`
`43.
`
`CenturyLink makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells the '205 Accused
`
`Activities (including, for example, those described above) with knowledge of or willful blindness
`
`to the fact that its actions will induce CenturyLink's customers to infringe the '205 patent.
`
`CenturyLink induces others to infringe the '205 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 by
`
`encouraging and facilitating others to practice the '205 patent's inventions for accelerated
`
`network communications with intent that those performing the acts infringe the '205 patent. For
`
`example, CenturyLink provides '205 Accused Activities, such as services wherein CenturyLink
`
`supports and provides, sets up and/or operates equipment for its customers, causing its customers
`
`to perform infringing RSC functionality and practice the InfiniBand and/or RoCE protocols.
`
`06973-00001/8291414.2
`
`18
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/26/16 Page 96 of 97 PageID #: 911Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 34-3 Filed 05/18/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 357
`
`F.
`
`A judgment and order finding that this is an exceptional case within the meaning
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 285, and an award to Alacritech of its attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred
`
`in connection with this Action; and
`
`G.
`
`Such other relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Alacritech demands a trial
`
`by jury on all matters and issues triable by jury.
`
`Dated: August 25, 2016
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`/s/ Claude M. Stern with permission Andrea L.
`Fair
`Claude M. Stern
`California State Bar No. 96737
`claudestern@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 801-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
`
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com
`California State Bar No. 228222
`Jordan Brock Kaericher
`California State Bar No. 265953
`jordankaericher@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 443-3000
`Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
`
`T. John Ward, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 00794818
`jw@wsfirm.com
`Claire Abernathy Henry
`Texas State Bar No. 24053063
`
`06973-00001/8291414.2
`
`96
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket