`
`
`
`Case No. 2:21-CV-0040-JRG-RSP
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS,
`LLC
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD., ET AL.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`Pretrial Conference
`MAG. JUDGE ROY PAYNE PRESIDING
`January 31, 2022
`OPEN: 9:03 am ADJOURN: 12:32 pm
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LAW CLERK:
`
`
`
`
`COURT REPORTER:
`
`COURTROOM DEPUTY:
`
`Court opened. Case called. Fred Williams announced ready for plaintiff and introduced
`co-counsel. Gil Gillam announced ready for defendants and introduced co-counsel.
`
`Jury Selection will be March 7, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Gilstrap.
`
`The parties informed the Court of any agreements made thus far and the disputes still at issue.
`
`The parties will be allowed 11 hours of evidence per side. The parties will have 30 minutes per
`side for voir dire. Eight jurors will be seated. The parties will have four preemptory strikes
`each side. The parties will have 30 minutes for opening statements.
`
`The parties will provide 10 juror notebooks at the beginning of the trial. Each notebook shall
`contain a sheet with a photo of each witness with the name under the photo and lines for taking
`notes, a copy of the patent, the Court’s claim construction and a 3-hole punched note pad. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fred Williams
`Todd Landis
`John Wittenzellner
`Michael Simons
`Daniel Garza
`
`Chris Kennerly
`Allan Soobert
`Gil Gillam
`
`Daniel Shuminer
`
`Susan Zielie
`
`Becky Andrews
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 225 Filed 01/31/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 10387
`
`notebooks shall be delivered to chambers on Thursday, March 3, 2022.
`
`Plaintiff’s counsel was instructed to file their final reduction of claims by February 14, 2022 and
`Defendants’ counsel was instructed to file their final prior art elections by February 21, 2022.
`
`Mr. Kennerly brought up the issue regarding interpreters and proposed one interpreter for both
`sides. Fred Williams confirmed that this is acceptable.
`
`The Court heard Defendants’ objections to Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine. Fred Williams,
`Michael Simons and John Wittenzellner argued for plaintiff. Chris Kennerly and Allan Soobert
`argued for defendants. The Court made rulings.
`
`After the break, the Court heard Plaintiff’s objections to Defendants’ Motions in Limine. The
`Court made rulings.
`
`Chris Kennerly and Allan Soobert then argued Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary
`Judgment of No Infringement and No Damages (Dkt. No. 140). John Wittenzellner responded.
`
`The next pretrial conference will be held on February 25, 2022 at 9:00 a.m.
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
