throbber
Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 224 Filed 01/30/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 10380
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS,
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`v.
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD., AND
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`C.A. NO. 2:21-cv-00040-JRG
` LEAD CONSOLIDATED CASE
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`
`C.A. NO. 2:21-cv-00041-JRG
`
`
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT STIPULATION OF AGREED MOTIONS IN LIMINE
`
`Pursuant to the Sixth Amended Docket Control Order (Dkt. 155), Plaintiff Gesture
`
`Technology Partners, LLC (“GTP”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) (altogether, “Parties”) file this Supplemental
`
`Joint Stipulation of Agreed Motions in Limine. The Parties agree not to mention, allude to, refer
`
`to, or elicit testimony upon, in any manner, in the presence of the jury – whether during voir dire,
`
`opening statement, the presentation of evidence, closing argument, or any other phase of this trial
`
`– each of the categories of evidence discussed below without first approaching the Bench and
`
`seeking permission from the Court.
`
`16.
`
`No party will introduce any reference, evidence, testimony, or argument that there
`
`was any pre-suit contact, pre-suit knowledge, or willfulness; this does not preclude Samsung from
`
`introducing evidence, testimony, or argument that there was not any pre-suit contact or pre-suit
`
`knowledge.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 224 Filed 01/30/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 10381
`
`
`
`17.
`
`No party will introduce any reference, evidence, testimony, or argument related to
`
`non-reliance on opinion of counsel.
`
`18.
`
`No party will introduce any reference, evidence, testimony, or argument related to
`
`any duty of Samsung to investigate GTP’s patents prior to the litigation as part of its business.
`
`19.
`
`No party will introduce any reference, evidence, testimony, or argument related to
`
`the absence of any witness or executive.
`
`20.
`
`No party will introduce any reference, evidence, testimony (including expert
`
`testimony), or argument (or inquiry about or eliciting any testimony) that Dr. Pryor’s age or
`
`military service impacts the merits of the case as to infringement, invalidity, and damages or that
`
`Dr. Pryor’s age or military service impacts GTP’s burdens of proof; Dr. Pryor may testify fully
`
`regarding his age, experience, and military history.
`
`21.
`
`No party will introduce any reference, evidence, testimony (including expert
`
`testimony), or argument (or inquiry about or eliciting any testimony) regarding the workload,
`
`accuracy, thoroughness, and reliability of the USPTO or of its examiners; the parties may generally
`
`comment on, reiterate or repeat the points about the patent system and patenting process presented
`
`in the Federal Judicial Center video and/or the jury instructions, so long as neither party attempts
`
`generally to impune or generally to bolster the USPTO or the patent examination process.
`
`22.
`
`No party will introduce any reference, evidence, testimony (including expert
`
`testimony), or argument (or inquiry about or eliciting any testimony) about any matters that were
`
`not timely and properly disclosed pursuant to the Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, the Court’s Docket Control Order, or other Court Orders.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 224 Filed 01/30/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 10382
`
`
`
`23.
`
`No party will introduce any reference, evidence, testimony (including expert
`
`testimony), or argument regarding, or inquire about or elicit any testimony regarding equitable
`
`defenses or related issues.
`
`Given this stipulation, GTP withdraws its opposed motions in limine numbers 8, 9, 12, and
`
`17, and Samsung withdraws its opposed motions in limine numbers 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, and 16.
`
`
`Dated: January 30, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Fred I. Williams
`Fred I. Williams
`Texas State Bar No. 00794855
`Michael Simons
`Texas State Bar No. 24008042
`Robert Daniel Garza
`Texas State Bar No. 24097730
`Robert Rhodes
`Texas State Bar No. 24116958
`WILLIAMS SIMONS & LANDIS PLLC
`The Littlefield Building
`601 Congress Ave., Suite 600
`Austin, TX 78701
`Tel: 512-543-1354
`fwilliams@wsltrial.com
`msimons@wsltrial.com
`dgarza@wsltrial.com
`rrhodes@wsltria.com
`
`Todd E. Landis
`State Bar No. 24030226
`WILLIAMS SIMONS & LANDIS PLLC
`2633 McKinney Ave., Suite 130 #366
`Dallas, TX 75204
`Tel: 512-543-1357
`tlandis@wsltrial.com
`
`John Wittenzellner
`Pennsylvania State Bar No. 308996
`WILLIAMS SIMONS & LANDIS PLLC
`1735 Market Street, Suite A #453
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Tel: 512-543-1373
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 224 Filed 01/30/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 10383
`
`
`
`johnw@wsltrial.com
`
`Kevin S. Kudlac
`Texas Bar No. 00790089
`Kudlac PLLC
`1916 Wimberly Lane
`Austin, TX 78735
`Tel: 512-656-5743
`kevin@kudlacIP.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
`
`/s/ Christopher W. Kennerly
`Christopher W. Kennerly (TX Bar No. 00795077)
`chriskennerly@paulhastings.com
`Radhesh Devendran (pro hac vice)
`radheshdevendran@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 320-1800
`Facsimile: (650) 320-1900
`
`Allan M. Soobert
`allansoobert@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`2050 M Street NW
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone: 202-551-1700
`Facsimile: 202-551-1705
`
`Elizabeth L. Brann
`elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`4747 Executive Drive, 12th Floor
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: (858) 458-3000
`Facsimile: (858) 458-3005
`
`Robert Laurenzi robertlaurenzi@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: (212) 318-6000
`Facsimile: (212) 319-4090
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 224 Filed 01/30/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 10384
`
`
`
`
`Melissa R. Smith (TX Bar No. 24001351)
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 S. Washington Ave.
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co.,
`Ltd and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 224 Filed 01/30/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 10385
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on January 30, 2022 the undersigned caused a copy
`
`of the foregoing document to be served on all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system,
`
`pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Fred I. Williams
`Fred I. Williams
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket