`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 214-3 Filed 01/25/22 Page 1 of 8 PagelD #: 9979
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 214-3 Filed 01/25/22 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 9980
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROPOSED JOINT FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER
`(Trial Management Procedures)1
`
`This Exhibit details the Parties agreements and understandings regarding disclosing and
`
`exchanging information and resolving objections before and during trial. The Exchanges and
`
`deadlines are summarized in the following table.
`
`ACTIVITY
`of
`list
`Provide Court with
`unobjected to, preadmitted exhibits
`Notify opposing party that a witness
`will be called
`Provide deposition designation clips
`to be played
`Provide copies of demonstrative
`exhibits
`Provide copies of non-documentary
`or physical exhibits
`counter-
`Objections
`and
`designations to deposition testimony
`Objections to counter-designations
`of deposition testimony to be played
`Objections to non-documentary or
`physical exhibits
`Objections to demonstratives
`
`Meet and confer to resolve any
`outstanding
`objections
`to
`demonstratives
`Notify
`the court of unresolved
`dispute
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the
`
`DEADLINE
`7:00 pm Central one Calendar days before opening
`statements
`7:00 pm Central two Calendar days before witness will
`be called
`7:00 pm Central two Calendar days before witness will
`be called
`7:00 pm Central one Calendar day before
`demonstrative will be used
`7:00 pm Central two Calendar days before the exhibit
`will be used
`7:00 pm Central one Calendar day before witness will be
`called
`9:00 pm Central one Calendar day before witness will be
`called
`7:00 pm Central one Calendar day before the exhibits
`will be used
`9:00 pm Central one Calendar day before
`demonstrative will be used
`9:30 pm Central one Calendar day before witness will be
`called, exhibit will be used, or demonstrative will be
`used.
`10:30 pm Central one Calendar days before witness will
`be called, exhibit will be used, or demonstrative will be
`used.
`
`the
`
`
`1 The parties have indicated in brackets whether a particular section is agreed or disputed. GTP’s
`disputed proposals are set apart with brackets and highlighted in yellow. Samsung’s disputed
`proposals are set apart with brackets and highlighted in blue.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 214-3 Filed 01/25/22 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 9981
`
`
`
`Joint PTO Section E.
`
`c.
`
`[AGREED] Stipulation for Trial Management Procedures
`
`The Parties agree to the following procedure that will govern the disclosure of witnesses,
`
`exhibits, deposition testimony, and demonstratives to use at trial and the process to identify any
`
`objections remaining between the Parties with regard to these disclosures.
`
`i.
`
`[AGREED] Notification of live witnesses
`
`The Party calling a witness shall notify the opposing Party of the identities and the order
`
`in which they plan to witnesses by 7:00 pm Central time, two calendar days before the date on
`
`which the Party intends to call such witness (e.g., by 7:00 p.m. on Saturday for any witness who
`
`will be called on Monday).
`
`If a party provides a binder of exhibits to a live witness prior to the examination, the party
`
`will provide one copy of the other party.
`
`If counsel intends to change the order of witnesses or no longer expects to call a witness,
`
`they shall notify the other side as soon as possible. The parties also recognize that the COVID-19
`
`pandemic may affect the manner of presentation of witness testimony.
`
`ii.
`
`[AGREED] Exchange of deposition designations
`
`The Parties shall exchange proposed deposition designation clips by 7:00 p.m. Central two
`
`calendar days before the clips are to be played in trial, a workable copy of the actual recording to
`
`be played, including all designations and counter-designations, a timed report of the deposition
`
`designations, and shall identify any trial exhibits to be offered through that witness’ deposition
`
`testimony.
`
`The opposing party shall provide counter-designations and objections to the designated
`
`testimony by 7:00 p.m. Central one calendar day before the clips will be played. Objections to
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 214-3 Filed 01/25/22 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 9982
`
`
`
`counter designations will be exchanged by 9:00 p.m. Central the day before the testimony is to be
`
`played.
`
`The Parties will meet and confer to resolve any objections by 9:30 p.m. the day before the
`
`testimony is to be played. Either Party can eliminate any of its proposed designations before a clip
`
`is played.
`
`The designations and counter-designations must be presented in the order they appear in
`
`the transcript. All irrelevant and redundant material such as objections and colloquy between
`
`counsel will be eliminated when the deposition is played or read at trial. New material, not
`
`included in the parties’ pretrial designations, may not be added to a witnesses deposition testimony
`
`without good cause or the other party’s agreement. However, any deposition testimony may be
`
`used at trial for purposes of impeachment regardless of whether a Party identified that testimony
`
`on its list of deposition designations, if the testimony is otherwise competent for such purposes.
`
`iii.
`
`[AGREED] Deposition counter-designations
`
`Regardless of whether the testimony is read or played by video, the time available for each
`
`party’s trial presentation shall be reduced by the length of its designations and counter-
`
`designations.
`
`iv.
`
`[AGREED] Unobjected-to trial exhibits deemed admitted
`
`All unobjected-to trial exhibits listed on the final exhibit lists the Parties exchange before
`
`trial are deemed admitted when introduced into evidence by any Party during trial. The parties
`
`agree to exchange lists of “Admitted Exhibits” by 7:00 p.m. Central Time the night before opening
`
`statements.
`
`Each Party may use an exhibit that is listed on the other Party’s exhibit list, to the same
`
`effect as though it were listed on its own exhibit list, subject to evidentiary objections. Any exhibit,
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 214-3 Filed 01/25/22 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 9983
`
`
`
`once admitted, may be used equally by each Party. The listing of an exhibit by a Party on its
`
`exhibit list does not waive any evidentiary or other objections to that exhibit by the listing Party
`
`should the opposing Party attempt to offer it into evidence.
`
`v. Deadline to resolve exhibit objections
`
`The Parties agree to meet and confer prior to the pretrial conference in an effort to resolve
`
`all outstanding exhibit objections to the parties’ exhibit lists.
`
`[Samsung’s Proposal: A party shall identify trial exhibits to be used in connection with
`
`direct examination by 7:00 p.m. Central Time the calendar day before their intended use (e.g.,
`
`exhibits for Monday morning will be disclosed by noon on Sunday). Any objections will be
`
`provided no later than 9:00 p.m. Central Time that same day, and the parties shall meet and confer
`
`promptly thereafter on any such objections.]2 3
`
`
`
`[Samsung’s Proposal: The parties’ exhibit lists include exhibits that may not necessarily
`
`be introduced into evidence. Each party reserves the right to add additional exhibits to its exhibit
`
`list, for good cause shown, by agreement of the parties or as ordered by the Court. A party’s failure
`
`to introduce any exhibit appearing on its list shall not be commented on during trial. No party will
`
`remove a document or video from its exhibit list without agreement from the other party, unless it
`
`provides the other party the opportunity to add the document or video to its exhibit list.]4 5
`
`
`2 Samsung: Samsung believes this is necessary to help ensure an orderly presentation of evidence
`by the Parties and help avoid inappropriate surprise.
`
` 3
`
` GTP: GTP objects to this proposal and does not agree to identify trial exhibits to be used in
`connection with direct examination by 7:00 p.m. Central Time the calendar day before their
`intended use.
`
` 4
`
` Samsung: Samsung believes this language is necessary for purposes of clarity and consistency
`with the Court’s local rules and Federal Rules of Evidence.
`
` 5
`
` GTP: GTP objects to this proposal. GTP believes the above is governed by the Court’s local
`rules and Federal Rules of Evidence.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 214-3 Filed 01/25/22 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 9984
`
`
`
`
`
`[Samsung’s Proposal: Subject to other provisions of this Order, no party may offer as
`
`evidence an exhibit not present on its exhibit list absent Court order or agreement by the parties,
`
`except for purposes of impeachment or rehabilitation, if otherwise competent for such purposes.]6
`
`7
`
`Subject to all foundational requirements and other objections that might be made to the
`
`admissibility of the original, a legible copy of any exhibit may be offered into evidence in lieu of
`
`the original. The parties may use electronic versions of exhibits that are spreadsheets or slide
`
`presentations. A party may replace poor print or digital quality copies of exhibits with improved
`
`or higher resolution print or video digital quality copies.
`
`Any documents, videos, deposition transcripts, or portions thereof, or other items not
`
`specifically identified herein or offered into evidence, may still be used at trial for purposes of
`
`cross-examination, impeachment or rehabilitation if otherwise competent for such purposes and
`
`may be admitted into evidence consistent with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
`
`None of the foregoing stipulations shall serve as a waiver of any other objections a party
`
`may have to any trial exhibits, or abrogate the requirement that the party offering an exhibit into
`
`evidence satisfy any other rules governing the admissibility of evidence set forth in the Federal
`
`Rules of Evidence, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court’s Local Rules, or any other
`
`applicable rule or regulation. The parties agree to meet and confer in good faith to resolve
`
`objections to trial exhibits prior to their introduction at trial.
`
`vi. Demonstrative exhibits
`
`
`
` 6
`
` Samsung: Samsung believes this language is necessary for purposes of clarity and consistency
`with the Court’s local rules and Federal Rules of Evidence.
`
` 7
`
` GTP: GTP objects to this proposal. GTP believes the above is governed by the Court’s local
`rules and Federal Rules of Evidence.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 214-3 Filed 01/25/22 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 9985
`
`
`
`Demonstratives to be used on direct examination and opening statements will be provided
`
`to opposing counsel by 7:00 p.m. Central the night before they will be used. Any objections to
`
`such demonstratives will be served by 9:00 p.m. Central that same day. The Parties will attempt
`
`to resolve objections through a meet and confer to begin on or before 9:30 p.m. Central on the day
`
`the objections are served. If the parties cannot resolve objections, they will notify the Court by
`
`email by 10:30 p.m. on that same day. The parties will provide the Court with copies of the
`
`disputed demonstrative and request a hearing the following morning before the presentation of
`
`evidence resumes.
`
`Demonstrative exhibits (i.e., those that do not go back into the jury room) need not be listed
`
`on the Parties’ trial exhibit lists. Demonstrative exhibits do not include excerpts, highlights, or
`
`blow-up portions of exhibits to the extent there is no additional characterization of the exhibit. For
`
`example, a slide bearing a highlighted excerpt of an exhibit is not a demonstrative, but a slide
`
`bearing an additional description or characterization of the highlighted excerpt of an exhibit shall
`
`be considered demonstrative.
`
`The parties further agree that the above notice provisions concerning demonstrative
`
`exhibits do not apply to demonstrative exhibits created in the courtroom during live testimony or
`
`that are ballooning, excerption, highlighting etc. of witness testimony, attorney statements or
`
`attorney argument generated during the trial before the jury.
`
`The party seeking to use a demonstrative exhibit shall provide a color copy (if the original
`
`exhibit is in color) representation of the demonstrative in PDF format to the other side in
`
`accordance with the schedule set forth above. For videos and animations, the party seeking to use
`
`the demonstrative exhibit shall provide it to the other side in digital interactive format, including
`
`as applicable, flash format, PPT format, MPG or any other video format. A party’s demonstrative
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG-RSP Document 214-3 Filed 01/25/22 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 9986
`
`
`
`will not be used, in whole or in part, by the other party prior to it being used by the disclosing
`
`party.
`
`vii.
`
`[AGREED] Nondocumentary or Physical Exhibits
`
`The parties shall identify and make available for inspection any non-documentary exhibits,
`
`such as physical exhibits, that the parties plan to use at trial during direct examination, by 7:00
`
`p.m. Central Time two calendar days before anticipated use. Any objections will be provided by
`
`no later than 7:00 pm Central Time one calendar day before anticipated use. The parties shall meet
`
`and confer by 9:30 p.m. Central Time one calendar day before anticipated use. If the parties cannot
`
`resolve objections, they will notify the Court by email by 10:30 p.m. on that same day providing
`
`the Court with copies of the disputed demonstrative and requesting a hearing the following
`
`morning before the presentation of evidence resumes.
`
`viii.
`
`[Samsung’s Proposal: Estimate of Finishing Presentation
`
`By 7:00 p.m. Central before each day that a Party is presenting a case, its counsel shall
`
`provide to the other Party an estimate of when it expects to finish its presentation of the evidence.
`
`By 7:00 p.m. Central Time two calendar days before it intends to rest its case-in-chief, the resting
`
`party shall give the other party notice of its intention to rest so that the parties have an opportunity
`
`to comply with the other provisions of this Order]8 9
`
`
`8 Samsung: Samsung asks that GTP indicate two calendar days before it intends to rest its case-
`in-chief so that Samsung may properly advise its out-of-town witnesses.
`9 GTP: GTP objects to this proposal. GTP believes this is duplicative of the sections above.
`
`
`
`7
`
`