`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00040-JRG
`
`
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00041-JRG
`
`
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`§§§§§§§§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is the Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Samsung
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS,
`LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD., HUAWEI
`DEVICE USA INC.,
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Electronics America, Inc.’s Motion to Shorten Time to File Response (Dkt. No. 85) (the
`
`“Motion”). In the Motion, Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc. (“Samsung”) request the Court to shorten the time for Plaintiff Gesture Technology
`
`Partners, LLC (“Gesture”) to respond to Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt. No. 84).
`
`Having considered the Motion, and noting that briefing for Defendants’ Motion for a
`
`Protective Order (Dkt. No. 84) is already complete, the Court finds that the Motion should be and
`
`hereby is DENIED AS MOOT.
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 20th day of January, 2022.
`
`