`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 1 of 14 PagelD #: 6687
`
`EXHIBIT 11
`EXHIBIT 11
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 2 of 14 PageID #: 6688
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto,gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`90/014,903
`
`11/11/2021
`
`8878949
`
`752891.00085
`
`2469
`
`12/02/2021
`7590
`184036
`Williams Simons & Landis PLLC/ GTP
`The Littlefield Building
`60 I Congress Ave., Suite 600
`Austin, TX 7870 I
`
`EXAMINER
`
`MENEFEE, JAMES A
`
`ART UNIT
`
`3992
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`12/02/2021
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 3 of 14 PageID #: 6689
`
`Order Granting Request For
`Ex Parle Reexamination
`
`Control No.
`
`90/014,903
`
`Examiner
`
`Patent Under Reexamination
`
`8878949
`
`Art Unit
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`
`James Menefee
`
`3992
`
`No
`
`--The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address--
`
`The request for ex parte reexamination filed 11/11/2021 has been considered and a determination has
`been made. An identification of the claims, the references relied upon, and the rationale supporting the
`determination are attached.
`
`Attachments: a)O PTO-892,
`
`b)0
`
`PTO/SB/08,
`
`c)O Other:
`
`1. 0
`
`The request for ex parte reexamination is GRANTED.
`
`RESPONSE TIMES ARE SET AS FOLLOWS:
`
`For Patent Owner's Statement (Optional): TWO MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication
`(37 CFR 1.530 (b)). EXTENSIONS OF TIME ARE GOVERNED BY 37 CFR 1.550(c).
`
`For Requester's Reply (optional): TWO MONTHS from the date of service of any timely filed
`Patent Owner's Statement (37 CFR 1.535). NO EXTENSION OF THIS TIME PERIOD IS PERMITTED.
`If Patent Owner does not file a timely statement under 37 CFR 1.530(b ), then no reply by requester
`is permitted.
`
`cc:Requester ( if third party requester )
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-471G(Rev. 01-13)
`
`Office Action In Ex Parte Reexamination
`
`Part of Paper No. 20211116
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 4 of 14 PageID #: 6690
`
`Application/Control Number: 90/014,903
`Art Unit: 3992
`
`Page 2
`
`ORDER GRANTING REEXAMINATION REQUEST
`
`A substantial new question ofpatentability ("SNQ") affecting claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,878,949 ("the '949 patent") is raised by the reexamination request filed 11/11/2021
`
`("Request"). The '949 patent was filed before March 16, 2013, and is being examined under the
`
`pre-AIA first to invent regime.
`
`Based on the specific reference to earlier applications and the O day patent tenn
`
`adjustment on the face of the patent, the '949 patent is expired. This proceeding therefore will
`
`use the ordinary and customary meaning claim construction standard set forth in Phillips v. A WH
`
`Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005). MPEP 2258 I.G. Furthermore, no amendments other than
`
`the cancellation of claims will be permitted in this proceeding. 37 CFR 1.530G).
`
`References Cited as Raising SNQs
`
`U.S. Patent 6,115,482 to Sears et al. ("Sears")
`
`U.S. Patent 6,198,485 to Mack et al. ("Mack")
`
`Prosecution History
`
`The '949 patent is drawn to a camera that is configured to automatically take pictures
`
`when a person makes a gesture, such as raising one's right hand. There is a camera for taking the
`
`picture, and there is a separate camera or sensor in the same housing for sensing the gestures.
`
`The '949 patent was filed on 8/7/2013 as application 13/961,452 and is part ofa chain of several
`
`continuation application. In the first Office action on the merits the claims were rejected on
`
`several different grounds of double patenting, and also as anticipated or obvious over a reference
`
`to Sengupta. In a response filed 3/27/2014 the applicant amended some claims, filed a terminal
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 5 of 14 PageID #: 6691
`
`Application/Control Number: 90/014,903
`Art Unit: 3992
`
`Page 3
`
`disclaimer to overcome the double patenting rejections, and argued that Sengupta did not show
`
`that the camera and sensor be disposed in the same housing. The tenninal disclaimers were not
`
`approved as they identified a party who is not the applicant, and in a final rejection mailed
`
`5/14/2014 the examiner maintained the double patenting and art rejections, arguing that the
`
`distinguishing features were not claimed.
`
`On 8/14/2014 applicant filed a request for continued examination with new terminal
`
`disclaimers and claim amendments. The terminal disclaimers were again not approved for the
`
`same reason. In a non-final action mailed 8/26/2014 the examiner maintained the double
`
`patenting rejections but withdrew the art rejections without comment. Applicant filed new
`
`terminal disclaimers on 8/26/2014 that were subsequently approved. A notice of allowance was
`
`mailed 9/18/2014 without reasons for allowance.
`
`Turning back to the 8/14/2014 amendments, applicant added the requirement that the
`
`housing/device encompasses the electro-optic sensor and digital camera, that the processing unit
`
`is adapted to determine a gesture has been performed in the sensor field of view based on the
`
`sensor output, and that the gesture corresponds to an image capture command that causes the
`
`digital camera to store an image to memory. Applicant argued that Sengupta hands off between
`
`separate cameras and therefore lacked a housing encompassing the sensor and camera. Applicant
`
`also argued that Sengupta merely reports the location of moving objects and does not determine
`
`that a gesture corresponds to an image capture command. Applicant stated that the examiner had
`
`agreed in a 8/7/2014 interview that these changes would overcome the rejections based on
`
`Sengupta. Accordingly, it is apparent the claims were allowable over the art due to these features
`
`that were lacking in Sengupta. These technical teachings were missing from the a1i during the
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 6 of 14 PageID #: 6692
`
`Application/Control Number: 90/014,903
`Art Unit: 3992
`
`Page4
`
`original prosecution, and art showing such features would have been important to a reasonable
`
`examiner in determining the patentability of the claims.
`
`The '949 patent is also subject to currently pending IPRs IPR2021-00921 and IPR2022-
`
`00092. As of this writing a decision on institution has not yet been made in those proceedings
`
`and the petitioners used different art than that relied upon herein. These proceedings therefore
`
`are not a final decision or concluded review affecting the SNQ analysis.
`
`The '949 patent has also been subject to a number of litigation proceedings, as set forth in
`
`the litigation search in the file and also in the Request. As far as the examiner can tell, none of
`
`these proceedings resulted in any final determination as to the validity of any of the patent
`
`claims. These proceedings therefore do not affect the SNQ analysis.
`
`Proposed SNQs
`
`Requester proposes the following SNQs:
`
`1. Claims 1-18 are obvious over Sears.
`
`2. Claim 11 is obvious over Sears in view of Mack.
`
`As described in the Request, Sears is a print reading device with voice output, so that
`
`people with impaired vision or difficulty reading may have words read to them by a computer.
`
`The user performs hand gestures that perform various commands on the system, such as to begin
`
`reading an entire page, speeding up or slowing down, stopping, etc. There is a camera that reads
`
`the text and also a sensor that interprets the gestures, and these may be in the same housing. This,
`
`a single housing including a camera that takes pictures and a sensor that interprets gestures is one
`
`of the features that was missing during the original prosecution. The text is further stored in
`
`memory so that it can be OCR' d, therefore the gestures might be considered to cause an image
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 7 of 14 PageID #: 6693
`
`Application/Control Number: 90/014,903
`Art Unit: 3992
`
`Pages
`
`capture command to store an image in memory. This is another feature that was missing during
`
`the original prosecution.
`
`Sears therefore provides a new technical teaching that was not present during the original
`
`prosecution, and a reasonable examiner would have found the reference important in considering
`
`the patentability of the claims. A SNQ is raised by Sears alone. Mack is additionally provided to
`
`show that it was known for an electro-optic sensor to have first and second sensors fixed relative
`
`to a camera, as an alternative rejection of claim 11. The combination of Sears and Mack
`
`therefore provides a new technical teaching for the same reasons as Sears alone, and the
`
`combination would have been important to a reasonable examiner in considering the
`
`patentability of claim 11. A SNQ is raised by the combination of Sears and Mack.
`
`The teachings of these references as discussed in the Request are not cumulative to any
`
`written discussion on the record of the teachings of the prior art, were not previously considered
`
`nor addressed during a prior examination, and the same question was not the subject of a final
`
`holding of invalidity in the Federal Courts.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Patent owner is reminded of the continuing responsibility under 37 CFR l.565(a) to
`
`apprise the Office of any prior or concurrent proceeding involving the '949 patent. See MPEP § §
`
`2207, 2282 & 2286. Requester may also notify the Office of such proceedings.
`
`All correspondence relating to this ex parte reexam proceeding should be directed as follows:
`
`By U.S. Postal Service Mail to:
`
`Mail Stop Ex Parte Reexam
`ATTN: Central Reexamination Unit
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 8 of 14 PageID #: 6694
`
`Page 6
`
`Application/Control Number: 90/014,903
`Art Unit: 3992
`
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`ByFAXto:
`
`(571)273-9900
`Central Reexamination Unit
`
`By hand to: Customer Service Window
`Randolph Building
`401 Dulany St.
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`Registered users ofEFS-Web may alternatively submit correspondence via the electronic
`
`filing system at https://efs.uspto.gov/efile/myportal/efs-registered
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or as to the status of this proceeding, should
`
`be directed to the Central Reexamination Unit at telephone number (571) 272-7705.
`
`Signed:
`
`/JAMES A MENEFEE/
`Reexamination Specialist, Art Unit 3992
`(571) 272-1944
`December 1, 2021
`
`Conferees:
`
`/LINH M NGUYEN/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992
`
`/HETUL B PATEL/
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3992
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 9 of 14 PageID #: 6695
`PTO/SB/0Ba (01-10)
`Doc code: IDS
`Approved for use through 07/31/2012. 0MB 0651-0031
`Doc description: Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid 0MB control number.
`
`.,...,, V.L"S f JV . J
`
`Application Number
`
`3961452
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`( Not for submission under 37 CFR 1.991
`
`Filing Date
`
`First Named Inventor 1 fnmothy R. Pryor
`
`013-08-07
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`l
`
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`Examiner Cite
`Initial*
`No
`
`Patent Number
`
`Kind
`Code1
`
`Issue Date
`
`Name of Patentee or Applicant
`of cited Document
`
`Pages,Columns,Lines where
`Relevant Passages or Relevant
`Figures Appear
`
`U.S.PATENTS
`
`I Remove I
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`i982853
`
`999-11-09
`
`.iebermann
`
`115482
`
`'000-09-05
`
`,ears et al.
`
`0622015
`
`2003-09-16
`
`Himmel et al.
`
`,434403
`
`~002-08-13
`
`l\usems et al.
`
`5594469
`
`997-01-14
`
`creeman et al.
`
`l144366
`
`'000-11-07
`
`~umazaki et al.
`
`0256033
`
`001-07-03
`
`Nguyen
`
`,454043
`
`995-09-26
`
`reeman
`
`EFS Web 2.1.17
`
`--- -------·--- ----------- ------- ··----- ------ ----------
`
`,_ - __ ,
`
`
`
`.,...,,_...,..,_.t"'"'
`....,..._ '"'"-' •
`.a.,._ I
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 10 of 14 PageID #: 6696
`'
`13961452
`Application Number
`
`,._,._I .._ ...,.._ ,._
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`( Not for submission under 37 CFR 1.99)
`
`Filing Date
`
`2013-08-07
`
`First Named Inventor l Timothy R. Pryor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`I
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`9
`
`4988981
`
`1991-01-29
`
`"Immerman et al.
`
`10
`
`147678
`
`2000-11-14
`
`Kumar et al.
`
`11
`
`,748326
`
`998-05-05
`
`"hompson-Bell et al.
`
`12
`
`262767
`
`2001-07-17
`
`Nakui
`
`13
`
`677996
`
`,004-01-13
`
`Chung et al.
`
`14
`
`534921
`
`h996-07-09
`
`13awanobori
`
`15
`
`249053
`
`993-09-28
`
`!Jain
`
`16
`
`3198485
`
`2001-03-06
`
`Vlack et al.
`
`17
`
`475427.
`
`1995-12-12
`
`f-lorowilz
`
`If you wish to add additional U.S. Patent citation information please click the Add button.
`U.S.PATENT APPLICATION PUBLICATIONS
`
`I
`I Add
`I Remove I
`
`Examiner
`Initial*
`
`Cite No
`
`Publication
`Number
`
`Kind Publication
`Code1 Date
`
`Name of Patentee or Applicant
`of cited Document
`
`Pages,Columns,Lines where
`Relevant Passages or Relevant
`Figures Appear
`
`EFSWeb2.1.17
`
`__ -
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • • - - - - - - - - - - - •
`
`I -
`
`-
`
`• • I
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 11 of 14 PageID #: 6697
`13961452
`Application Number
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`( Not for submission under 37 CFR 1.99)
`
`2013-08-07
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor I Timothy R. Pryor
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`I
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`1
`
`I
`If you wish to add additional U.S. Published Application citation information please click the Add button.I Add
`IRemovel
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Examiner Cite Foreign Document
`No Number3
`Initial*
`
`Country
`Code2i
`
`Kind Publication
`Code4 Date
`
`Name of Patentee or
`Applicant of cited
`Document
`
`Pages,Columns,Lines
`where Relevant
`Passages or Relevant
`Figures Appear
`
`T5
`
`1
`
`175288
`
`;A
`
`1997-10-30
`
`lushnag
`
`If you wish to add additional Foreign Patent Document citation information please click the Add button I Add I
`IRemovel
`NON-PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`Examiner Cite
`Initials* No
`
`Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when appropriate), title of the item
`(book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog, etc), date, pages(s), volume-issue number(s),
`publisher, city and/or country where published.
`
`T5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`i11ICROSOFT, Microsoft Announces Release of Windows CE 2.0 - Stories, Sept. 29, 1997.
`
`V. PAVLOVIC et al., Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Human-Computer Interaction: A Review, 19 IEEE
`RANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 677 (1997).
`
`3
`
`3ony DXC-LS1 Brochure, 1997.
`
`4
`
`lushnag Bibliographic Summary, Canadian Patents Database, accessed August 2021.
`
`If you wish to add additional non-patent literature document citation information please click the Add button I Add
`EXAMINER SIGNATURE
`
`I
`
`Examiner Signature 11
`
`/JAMES A MENEFEE/
`
`11/17/2021
`
`I Date Considered
`11
`*EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through a
`citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`
`EFSWeb2.1.17
`
`- - - - - - - - - • • - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - • • - - - - • • • • - - - - - • • - - - • • - - • • - • •
`
`I - -
`
`• • I
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 12 of 14 PageID #: 6698
`13961452
`Application Number
`
`.;,,\,If U.L'""' f JU . . J
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`( Not for submission under 37 CFR 1.991
`
`Filing Date
`
`First Named Inventor l Timothy R. Pryor
`
`2013-08-07
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`I
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`1 See Kind Codes of USPTO Patent Documents at www.USPTO.GOV or MPEP 901.04. 2 Enter office that Issued the document, by the two-letter code (WIPO
`Standard ST.3). 3 For Japanese patent documents, the Indication of the year of the reign of the Emperor must precede the serial number of the patent document.
`4 Kind of document by the appropriate symbols as indicated on the document under WIPO Standard ST.16 if possible. 5 Applicant is to place a check mark here i
`English language translation is attached.
`
`EFS Web 2.1.17
`
`--- ----------- ----------- ------- ------- - ----- ----------
`
`I
`
`-
`
`-
`
`• • I
`
`
`
`.................. .t"...
`
`.......... ...... •
`
`... ... ,
`
`...... , ... ,.,, ......
`
`_,,.,,, ,.,, ....... , _,,.,,_,
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 13 of 14 PageID #: 6699
`13961452
`Application Number
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`( Not for submission under 37 CFR 1.99)
`
`Filing Date
`
`First Named Inventor I Timothy R. Pryor
`
`2013-08-07
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`I
`
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
`
`Please see 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98 to make the appropriate selection(s):
`
`That each item of information contained in the information disclosure statement was first cited in any communication
`from a foreign patent office in a counterpart foreign application not more than three months prior to the filing of the
`information disclosure statement. See 37 CFR 1.97(e)(1).
`
`OR
`
`That no item of information contained in the information disclosure statement was cited in a communication from a
`foreign patent office in a counterpart foreign application, and, to the knowledge of the person signing the certification
`after making reasonable inquiry, no item of information contained in the information disclosure statement was known to
`D any individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) more than three months prior to the filing of the information disclosure
`statement. See 37 CFR 1.97(e)(2).
`
`See attached certification statement.
`
`The fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17 (p) has been submitted herewith.
`X A certification statement is not submitted herewith.
`
`SIGNATURE
`A signature of the applicant or representative is required in accordance with CFR 1.33, 10.18. Please see CFR 1.4(d) for the
`form of the signature.
`
`Signature
`
`Name/Print
`
`/Joseph E. Palys/
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`
`Date (YYYY-MM-DD)
`
`2021-11-11
`
`Registration Number
`
`~6508
`
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the
`public which is to file (and by the US PTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR
`1.14. This collection is estimated to take 1 hour to complete, including gathering, preparing and submitting the completed
`application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you
`require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S.
`Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND
`FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria,
`VA 22313-1450.
`
`EFSWeb2.1.17
`
`_ _ _
`
`_ __________ - - - - - - - - - - - - • • - - - - - - - • - - - - - • - - - - • • - - - - - • -
`
`l
`
`-
`
`-
`
`• • l
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 157-11 Filed 12/16/21 Page 14 of 14 PageID #: 6700
`
`.., .._..., f .;;v..,
`
`.;; v I
`
`Privacy Act Statement
`
`The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with your submission of the
`attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to the requirements of the Act, please be advised
`that: (1) the general authority for the collection of this information is 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited
`is voluntary; and (3) the principal purpose for which the information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to
`process and/or examine your submission related to a patent application or patent. If you do not furnish the requested
`information, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may not be able to process and/or examine your submission, which may
`result in termination of proceedings or abandonment of the application or expiration of the patent.
`
`The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the Freedom of Information Act
`(5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a). Records from this system of records may be disclosed to the
`Department of Justice to determine whether the Freedom of Information Act requires disclosure of these record s.
`
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of presenting evidence to a
`court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to opposing counsel in the course of settlement
`negotiations.
`
`A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of Congress submitting a
`request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the individual has requested assistance from the
`Member with respect to the subject matter of the record.
`
`A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the Agency having need for
`the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of information shall be required to comply with the
`requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).
`
`A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in this system of records
`may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization, pursuant
`to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
`
`A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal agency for purposes of
`National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 218(c)).
`
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator, General Services, or
`his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA as part of that agency's responsibility to
`recommend improvements in records management practices and programs, under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and
`2906. Such disclosure shall be made in accordance with the GSA regulations governing inspection of records for this
`purpose, and any other relevant (i.e., GSA or Commerce) directive. Such disclosure shall not be used to make
`determinations about individuals.
`
`8.
`
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after either publication of
`the application pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b) or issuance of a patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 151. Further, a record
`may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of 37 CFR 1.14, as a routine use, to the public if the record was filed in
`an application which became abandoned or in which the proceedings were terminated and which application is
`referenced by either a published application, an application open to public inspections or an issued patent.
`
`9.
`
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal, State, or local law
`enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or regulation.
`
`EFSWeb2.1.17
`
`-- - ------·---- ------------ -·----- --·---- - ----- -----------
`
`' - - -- ,
`
`