`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00040-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00041-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
` §
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY
`PARTNERS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY
`PARTNERS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
`OF THE COURT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER (DKT. 93) ON THE
`“FORWARD FACING” TERMS
`
`Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc.’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Claim Construction Order (Dkt. 93) on
`
`the “Forward Facing” Terms. Having considered the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court
`
`finds the motion is well taken and is hereby GRANTED. The Court thus hereby finds that “forward
`
`facing portion” and “forward facing light source” are indefinite, and that therefore Claims 1-18 of
`
`the ’949 Patent are indefinite.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`