`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS,
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD., and
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`C.A. NO. 2:21-cv-00040-JRG
`
` LEAD CONSOLIDATED CASE
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`C.A. NO. 2:21-cv-00041-JRG
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY
`CERTAIN DEADLINES AND NOTICE OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiff Gesture Technology Partners, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and
`
`Defendants Huawei Device Co., Ltd. and Huawei Device USA, Inc. (“Defendants”) (collectively,
`
`the “Parties”) Joint Motion to Stay Certain Deadlines and Notice of Partial Settlement (the
`
`“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 101). In the Motion, the Parties inform the Court that they have reached a
`
`partial settlement in principle as to matters in controversy regarding claims or issues that solely
`
`relate to Defendants’ products other than the Nexus 6P, but not including any other claims or
`
`issues. The Parties request a partial stay of deadlines in the above-captioned matter, including all
`
`pending deadlines regarding claims or issues that solely relate to Defendants’ products other than
`
`the Nexus 6P, but not including or affecting any aspect of any other claims or issues, which will
`
`proceed as set forth in the previous Orders of this Court.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00040-JRG Document 101-1 Filed 10/19/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3217
`
`
`
`Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and
`
`hereby is GRANTED.
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that pending deadlines in the above-captioned matter
`
`regarding claims or issues that solely relate to Defendants’ products other than the Nexus 6P, but
`
`not including or affecting any aspect of any other claims or issues, are STAYED for thirty (30)
`
`days from the date of this Order, during which time appropriate papers shall be filed with the Court.
`
`
`
`– 2 –
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
