`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`§
`
`§
`Case No.
`§
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`d/b/a UBER,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff, AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software” or “Plaintiff”) files this
`
`original Complaint against Defendant Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber (“Uber” or “Defendant”)
`
`for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and alleges as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software is a limited liability company organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Texas and maintains its principal place of business at 100 W.
`
`Houston Street, Marshall, Texas 75670. AGIS Software is the owner of all right, title, and
`
`interest in and to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,031,728, 7,630,724, 8,213,970, 10,299,100, 10,341,838 and
`
`(the “Patents-in-Suit”).
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Uber is a Delaware corporation and maintains its principal place of
`
`business at 1455 Market Street, #400, San Francisco, California 94103, and may be served with
`
`process via its registered agent, Corporation Service Company at 251 Little Falls Drive,
`
`Wilmington, Delaware 19808. Upon information and belief, Uber does business in Texas,
`
`directly or through intermediaries, and offers its products and/or services, including those
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 53 PageID #: 2
`
`accused herein of infringement, to customers and potential customers located in Texas, including
`
`in the judicial Eastern District of Texas.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a), and 1367.
`
`4.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Uber in this action because Uber has
`
`committed acts within the Eastern District of Texas giving rise to this action and has established
`
`minimum contacts with this forum such that the exercise of jurisdiction over Uber would not
`
`offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Uber conducts business and has
`
`committed acts of patent infringement and/or has induced acts of patent infringement by others
`
`in this Judicial District and/or has contributed to patent infringement by others in this Judicial
`
`District, the State of Texas, and elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, offering
`
`to sell and selling products and/or services that infringe the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and
`
`1400(b). Uber is registered to do business in Texas and, upon information and belief, Uber has
`
`transacted business in the Eastern District of Texas, and has committed acts of direct and indirect
`
`infringement in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`Uber Greenlight
`
`6.
`
`For example, venue is proper because Uber maintains a regular and established
`
`place of business in this District with an Uber Greenlight Hub at 2301 North Central
`
`Expressway, Suite 145, Plano, Texas 75075. The Greenlight Hub at this location is a physical
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 53 PageID #: 3
`
`location of Uber in this District, from which Uber’s employees and/or agents conduct its
`
`business:
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 53 PageID #: 4
`Case 2:21-cv-00026—JRG Document 1
`Fl e 01 29 21 Page 4 o 53 PageID #: 4
`
`1
`
`
`
`2
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 53 PageID #: 5
`
`7.
`
`Upon information and belief, the Uber Greenlight Hub at 2301 North Central
`
`Expressway, Suite 145, Plano, Texas 75075 has continued to operate throughout the duration of
`
`the COVID-19 pandemic, either regularly or by appointment:
`
`
`
`
`1 https://www.google.com/maps/place/Uber+Greenlight/@33.0301283,-
`96.7093791,3a,75y/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipOkLpyQMzIEpxtBcxA4O2oatPlBhMu7D0s
`2hyHz!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipOkLpyQMzIE
`pxtBcxA4O2oatPlBhMu7D0s2hyHz%3Dw203-h270-k-
`no!7i3120!8i4160!4m8!1m2!2m1!1suber+greenlight!3m4!1s0x0:0x1a6b77e198ba1b5!8m2!3d3
`3.0308295!4d-96.7095566
`2 https://www.google.com/maps/place/Uber+Greenlight/@33.0301283,-
`96.7093791,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipOWt1SM6YgeiSh34D-
`52BLbhje5C4mB5bFBJ7ci!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FA
`F1QipOWt1SM6YgeiSh34D-52BLbhje5C4mB5bFBJ7ci%3Dw203-h114-k-
`no!7i4032!8i2268!4m8!1m2!2m1!1suber+greenlight!3m4!1s0x0:0x1a6b77e198ba1b5!8m2!3d3
`3.0308295!4d-96.7095566
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 6 of 53 PageID #: 6
`
`8.
`
`Uber’s Greenlight Hub provides support services to its drivers in this District.3
`
`For example, Uber drivers may visit a Greenlight Hub for onboarding, to activate their account,
`
`to have their profile pictures taken, for help with fares and payment, to change or remove a
`
`“partner,” for assistance after an accident or complaint, to return a lost item, for help operating
`
`the Uber application, and for help deleting their account.4
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, Uber’s Greenlight Hub, including the one in this
`
`District, is staffed by employees and/or agents of Uber. Those employees and/or agents carry
`
`out Uber’s business in this District by supporting the drivers responsible for its transportation
`
`and delivery service. The Uber Greenlight Hub is further regularly visited by Uber drivers, who
`
`are also Uber’s employees and/or agents that conduct its business in this District.
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, Uber also regularly establishes “Uber Spot”
`
`locations in this District.5 Uber Spots are “pop-up” locations from which Uber provides similar
`
`services to those provided through the Greenlight Hub. 6
`
`Uber Vehicles in this District
`
`11.
`
`Venue is also proper because the vehicles of Uber Drivers in this District are its
`
`regular and established places of business. The vehicles of Uber drivers in this District are
`
`physical locations of Uber that are regularly visited by agents or employees of Uber and are
`
`responsible for conducting Uber’s business.
`
`
`3 See https://help.uber.com/riders/article/greenlight-activation?nodeId=bccdc71d-b47a-44d9-
`9534-46d3d7ac69a5; see also https://www.uber.com/us/en/drive/contact/
`4 See https://help.uber.com/driving-and-delivering/section/book-an-in-person-
`appointment?nodeId=b7283a3d-1f70-48fb-a9e2-022766762104
`5 See e.g. https://www.howiuber.com/newyork
`6 Id.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 7 of 53 PageID #: 7
`
`12.
`
`Uber drivers are employees and/or agents who carry out Uber’s business from its
`
`Uber’s locations (e.g. their vehicles) in this District. Through its applications, Uber enters
`
`transactions with its passengers, drivers, and other users. Upon information and belief, Uber
`
`collects approximately a third of all payments for transportation and delivery services offered
`
`through its applications.7
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, there are over 900,000 Uber drivers in the United
`
`States.8 Uber makes its transportation and delivery services available throughout this District
`
`and maintains Uber drivers with their vehicles in this District at all times.9
`
`14.
`
`For example, Uber controls the terms on which its drivers do business through in
`
`this District, both by exercising technical control of the Uber, Uber Freight, and Uber Eats
`
`Applications, and by imposing extensive terms and conditions on its drivers.10
`
`15.
`
`For example, Uber contractually obligates its drivers to follow “Community
`
`Guidelines,” and may deactivate the account of any driver who does not comply. The
`
`Community Guidelines require that Uber’s drivers maintain clean vehicles, be respectful towards
`
`Uber’s customers, and disclose the use of video or audio recording devices, among other
`
`standards imposed by Uber.11 Uber further binds its drivers to follow its Firearms Prohibition
`
`
`7 See https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-how-much-uber-drivers-really-make-2018-05-
`15#:~:text=Uber%20drivers%20typically%20collect%20%2424.77%20per%20hour%20in%20p
`assenger%20fares.&text=From%20that%2C%20Uber%20takes%20%248.33,third%20of%20all
`%20passenger%20fares.&text=Vehicle%20expenses%20like%20gas%20and,into%20account%
`20their%20tax%20deductibility
`8 See https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/22/uber-lyft-ipo-drivers-unionize-low-
`pay-
`expenses#:~:text=According%20to%20Uber%2C%20there%20are,the%20expenses%20associat
`ed%20with%20driving
`9 See e.g. https://www.uber.com/global/en/cities/texarkana/
`10 See e.g. https://www.uber.com/legal/en/
`11 See https://www.uber.com/legal/en/document/?name=general-community-
`guidelines&country=united-states&lang=en
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 8 of 53 PageID #: 8
`
`Policy,12 Non-Discrimination Policy,13 its Refund Policy,14 its mandatory face covering policy,15
`
`its Service Animal Policy,16 and its Support Conduct Guidelines.17 Uber’s terms dictate when
`
`and how its drivers are to provide services and provide Uber the sole authority to change its
`
`policies at any time, and to terminate its drivers for virtually any reason.
`
`16.
`
`Uber also encourages drivers to mark their vehicles with Uber decals, “beacons,”
`
`and other Uber “trade dress.”18 Uber provides light-up “beacons” as “an exclusive Uber Pro
`
`Gift” to drivers in select cities, including in this District.19
`
`17.
`
`Uber compensates its drivers for following its policies both by enabling them to
`
`collect payments through the Uber and Uber Eats Applications, and by providing certain
`
`guaranteed minimum payments. For example, among other promotions, “if your guarantee offer
`
`amount is $1,000 and you earn $800 in fares, an additional $100 in tips, and an additional $50 in
`
`promotions (for a total of $950), you would receive an additional $200 because your fares didn’t
`
`meet the guarantee offer amount.”20
`
`
`12 https://www.uber.com/legal/en/document/?name=firearms-prohibition-
`policy&country=united-states&lang=en
`13 https://www.uber.com/legal/en/document/?name=non-discrimination-policy&country=united-
`states&lang=en
`14 https://www.uber.com/legal/en/document/?name=refund-policy&country=united-
`states&lang=en
`15 https://www.uber.com/blog/your-safety-during-the-new-normal/
`16 https://www.uber.com/legal/en/document/?name=service-animal-policy
`17 https://www.uber.com/legal/en/document/?name=support-conduct-guidelines
`18 See e.g. https://help.uber.com/driving-and-delivering/article/uber-decal-
`requirements?nodeId=421b14ed-0685-4188-9fa3-f2104e881c3f;
`https://ubersticker.hhglobal.com/
`19 https://www.uber.com/us/en/beacon/
`20 See https://www.uber.com/legal/en/document/?name=terms-and-conditions-of-guarantee-
`offers-for-current-drivers&country=united-states&lang=en
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 9 of 53 PageID #: 9
`
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`18.
`
`On July 3, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”) entitled “Method of Utilizing Forced Alerts
`
`for Interactive Remote Communications.” A true and correct copy of the ’970 Patent is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`19.
`
`On December 8, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 7,630,724 (the “’724 Patent”) entitled “Method of Providing a
`
`Cellular Phone/PDA Communication System.” A true and correct copy of the ’724 Patent is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`20.
`
`On April 18, 2006, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 7,031,728 (the “’728 Patent”) entitled “Cellular Phone/PDA
`
`Communication System.” A true and correct copy of the ’728 Patent is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit C.
`
`21.
`
`On May 21, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 10,299,100 (the “’100 Patent”), entitled “Method to Provide Ad Hoc and
`
`Password Protected Digital and Voice Networks. A true and correct copy of the ’100 Patent is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit D.
`
`22.
`
`On July 2, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally
`
`issued U.S. Patent No. 10,341,838 (the “’838 Patent”), entitled “Method to Provide Ad Hoc and
`
`Password Protected Digital and Voice Networks. A true and correct copy of the ’838 Patent is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit E.
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 10 of 53 PageID #: 10
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`23. Malcolm K. “Cap” Beyer, Jr., a graduate of the United States Naval Academy and
`
`a former U.S. Marine, is the CEO of AGIS Software and a named inventor of the AGIS patent
`
`portfolio. Mr. Beyer founded Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. (“AGIS, Inc.”)
`
`shortly after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks because he believed that many first
`
`responder and civilian lives could have been saved through the implementation of a better
`
`communication system. He envisioned and developed a new communication system that would
`
`use integrated software and hardware components on mobile devices to give users situational
`
`awareness superior to systems provided by conventional military and first responder radio
`
`systems.
`
`24.
`
`AGIS, Inc. developed prototypes that matured into its LifeRing system. LifeRing
`
`provides first responders, law enforcement, and military personnel with what is essentially a
`
`tactical operations center built into hand-held mobile devices. Using GPS-based location
`
`technology and existing or special-purpose cellular communication networks, LifeRing users can
`
`exchange location, heading, speed, and other information with other members of a group, view
`
`each other’s locations on maps and satellite images, and rapidly communicate and coordinate
`
`their efforts.
`
`25.
`
`AGIS Software licenses its patent portfolio, including the ’970, ’724, ’728, ’838,
`
`and ’100 Patents, to AGIS, Inc. AGIS, Inc.’s LifeRing product practices one or more of the
`
`patents in the AGIS portfolio and AGIS, Inc. has marked its products accordingly. AGIS
`
`Software and all previous assignees of the Patents-in-Suit have complied with the requirements
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 287(a).
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 11 of 53 PageID #: 11
`
`26.
`
`Uber has manufactured, used, marketed, distributed, sold, offered for sale, and
`
`exported from and imported into the United States products and software that infringe the
`
`Patents-in-Suit, e.g., the Uber, Uber Driver, Uber Eats, Uber Fleet, Uber Freight, Uber Eats
`
`Orders, and Uber Eats Manger Applications and the related services and/or servers for the
`
`applications (collectively, the “Accused Products”). The Accused Products infringe each of the
`
`Asserted Patents.
`
`27.
`
`The Accused Products include functionalities that allow users to form and/or join
`
`networks or groups, share and view locations with other users, display symbols corresponding to
`
`locations (including locations of other users) on a map, and communicate with other users via
`
`text, voice, and multimedia-based communication. Additionally, the Accused Products include
`
`functionalities to allow users to form and/or join networks or groups to request a ride and/or to
`
`schedule a delivery. The Accused Products include functionalities to display map information,
`
`including symbols corresponding with users (e.g. drivers and/or passengers), entities, and
`
`locations. The Accused Products include functionalities to send a forced message alert to which
`
`a required response must be transmitted, such as when a driver receives a request for a ride. The
`
`Accused Products include functionalities to enable communications, such as voice calls between
`
`users such as riders and drivers. The Accused Products practice the claims of the Asserted
`
`Patents to improve rider and driver experiences and to improve Uber’s position in the market.
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 12 of 53 PageID #: 12
`
`21
`
`
`21 https://media.rideguru.com/uploads/driver-pickup-request.png
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 13 of 53 PageID #: 13
`
`22
`
`
`22 https://pageflows.com/media/videos/screenie_571b9f10-8912-43c0-949e-0f62eb0cb093.jpg
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 14 of 53 PageID #: 14
`
`23
`
`COUNT I
`(Infringement of the ’970 Patent)
`
`28.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 27 are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth
`
`in their entireties.
`
`29.
`
`AGIS Software has not licensed or otherwise authorized Defendant to make, use,
`
`offer for sale, sell, or import any Accused Products and/or products that embody the inventions
`
`of the ’970 Patent.
`
`30.
`
`Defendant infringes, contributes to the infringement of, and/or induces
`
`infringement of the ’970 Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, distributing,
`
`
`23 https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yfeCBIk7Yl4/XGPz-sZI-
`bI/AAAAAAAAGMQ/hkmLi7M4e7A8CB6iiGnBcAJCkWMvGxBgwCLcBGAs/s1600/uber-
`voip-call.jpg
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 15 of 53 PageID #: 15
`
`exporting from, and/or importing into the United States products and/or methods covered by one
`
`or more claims of the ’970 Patent including, but not limited to, the Accused Products.
`
`31.
`
`Defendant has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 10 of the ’970
`
`Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, selling, offering for
`
`sale, distributing, exporting from, and/or importing into the United States the Accused Products
`
`without authority and in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`32.
`
`Defendant has and continues to indirectly infringe at least claim 10 of the ’970
`
`Patent by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing others to directly infringe, either
`
`literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, selling, offering for sale,
`
`distributing, exporting from, and/or importing into the United States the infringing Accused
`
`Products, and by instructing users of the Accused Products to perform at least the method of
`
`claim 10 in the ’970 Patent. For example, Defendant, with knowledge that the Accused Products
`
`infringe the ’970 Patent at least as of the date of this Complaint, actively, knowingly, and
`
`intentionally induced, and continues to actively, knowingly, and intentionally induce direct
`
`infringement of at least claim 10 of the ’970 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`33.
`
`For example, Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly
`
`infringe at least claim 10 of the ’970 Patent in the United States because Defendant’s customers
`
`use such Accused Products, including at least the Uber, Uber Driver, Uber Eats, Uber Fleet, Uber
`
`Freight, Uber Eats Orders, and Uber Eats Manger Applications alone or in conjunction with
`
`additional Accused Products (e.g. supporting hardware and software), in accordance with
`
`Defendant’s instructions and thereby directly infringe at least claim 10 of the ’970 Patent in
`
`violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. For example, Uber directly and/or indirectly intentionally instructs
`
`its customers to infringe through training videos, demonstrations, brochures, installations and/or
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 16 of 53 PageID #: 16
`
`user guides, such as those located at one or more of the following:
`
`https://www.uber.com/us/en/drive/basics/?city=dallas; https://help.uber.com/riders/section/a-
`
`guide-to-uber?nodeId=5a9e5cd6-88f4-4597-b29a-4feb67d407c2; and Uber agents and
`
`representatives located within this Judicial District. Defendant is thereby also liable for
`
`infringement of the ’970 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`34.
`
`Defendant directly infringes and/or indirectly infringes by practicing a method of
`
`receiving, acknowledging, and responding to a forced message alert from a sender PDA/cell
`
`phone to a recipient PDA/cell phone, wherein the receipt, acknowledgment, and response to said
`
`forced message alert is forced by a forced message alert software application program. For
`
`example, the Uber driver application is a forced message alert software application, which
`
`requires acknowledgement of forced message alerts (e.g. ride requests).
`
`35.
`
`Defendant directly infringes and/or indirectly infringes by receiving an
`
`electronically transmitted electronic message; identifying said electronic message as a forced
`
`message alert, wherein said forced message alert comprises a voice or text message and a forced
`
`message alert application software packet, which triggers the activation of the forced message
`
`alert software application program within the recipient PDA/cell phone. For example, the Uber
`
`Driver Application receives an electronically transmitted request for a ride which triggers a
`
`forced message alert that locks the device for a period of time until the user sends a response
`
`message (decline or accept) to clear the locked display:
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 17 of 53 PageID #: 17
`
`24
`
`36.
`
`Defendant directly and/or indirectly infringes by transmitting an automatic
`
`acknowledgment of receipt to the sender PDA/cell phone, which triggers the forced message
`
`alert software application program to take control of the recipient PDA/cell phone and show the
`
`content of the text message and a required response list on the display recipient PDA/cell phone
`
`or to repeat audibly the content of the voice message on the speakers of the recipient PDA/cell
`
`phone and show the required response list on the display recipient PDA/cell phone. For
`
`example, receipt of a ride request takes control of the Uber Driver’s cell phone, displays a
`
`message with at least a pickup location, and plays an alert until a required response is selected.
`
`
`24 https://media.rideguru.com/uploads/driver-pickup-request.png
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 18 of 53 PageID #: 18
`
`37.
`
`Defendant directly and/or indirectly infringes by transmitting a selected required
`
`response from the response list in order to allow the message required response list to be cleared
`
`from the recipient’s cell phone display, whether said selected response is a chosen option from
`
`the response list, causing the forced message alert software to release control of the recipient
`
`PDA/cell phone and stop showing the content of the text message and a response list on the
`
`display recipient PDA/cell phone, and/or stop repeating the content of the voice message on the
`
`speakers of the recipient PDA/cell phone. For example, the Uber Driver Application requires
`
`tapping to accept or dismiss a ride request to release control of the recipient cell phone.
`
`38.
`
`Defendant directly and/or indirectly infringes by displaying the response received
`
`from the PDA cell phone that transmitted the response on the sender of the forced alert PDA/cell
`
`phone. For example, The Uber Application displays a driver’s response when a request for a ride
`
`is accepted.
`
`39.
`
`Defendant has had knowledge and notice of the ’970 Patent at least as of the filing
`
`of the Complaint.
`
`40.
`
`Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe one or
`
`more claims of the ’970 Patent, as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by inducing infringement by
`
`others, such as Defendant’s customers and end-users, in this District and elsewhere in the United
`
`States. For example, Defendant’s customers and end-users directly infringe, either literally or
`
`under the doctrine of equivalents, through their use of the inventions claimed in the ’970 Patent.
`
`Defendant induces this direct infringement through its affirmative acts of manufacturing, selling,
`
`distributing, and/or otherwise making available the Accused Products, and providing
`
`instructions, documentation, and other information to customers and end-users suggesting that
`
`they use the Accused Products in an infringing manner, including technical support, marketing,
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 19 of 53 PageID #: 19
`
`product manuals, advertisements, and online documentation. Because of Defendant’s
`
`inducement, Defendant’s customers and end-users use Accused Products in a way Defendant
`
`intends and directly infringe the ’970 Patent. Defendant performs these affirmative acts with
`
`knowledge of the ’970 Patent and with the intent, or willful blindness, that the induced acts
`
`directly infringe the ’970 Patent.
`
`41.
`
`Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe one or
`
`more claims of the ’970 Patent, as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), by contributing to direct
`
`infringement by others, such as customers and end-users, in this District and elsewhere in the
`
`United States. Defendant’s affirmative acts of selling and offering to sell the Accused Products
`
`in this District and elsewhere in the United States and causing the Accused Products to be
`
`manufactured, used, sold, and offered for sale contributes to others’ use and manufacture of the
`
`Accused Products such that the ’970 Patent is directly infringed by others. The accused
`
`components within the Accused Products are material to the invention of the ’970 Patent, are not
`
`staple articles or commodities of commerce, have no substantial non-infringing uses, and are
`
`known by Defendant to be especially made or adapted for use in the infringement of the ’970
`
`Patent. Defendant performs these affirmative acts with knowledge of the ’970 Patent and with
`
`intent, or willful blindness, that they cause the direct infringement of the ’970 Patent.
`
`42.
`
`AGIS Software has suffered damages as a result of Defendant’s direct and
`
`indirect infringement of the ’970 Patent in an amount to be proved at trial.
`
`43.
`
`AGIS Software has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable harm as a
`
`result of Defendant’s infringement of the ’970 Patent for which there is no adequate remedy at
`
`law, unless Defendant’s infringement is enjoined by this Court.
`
`19
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 20 of 53 PageID #: 20
`
`COUNT II
`(Infringement of the ’724 Patent)
`
`44.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 27 are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth
`
`in their entireties.
`
`45.
`
`AGIS Software has not licensed or otherwise authorized Defendant to make, use,
`
`offer for sale, sell, or import any Accused Products and/or products that embody the inventions
`
`of the ’724 Patent.
`
`46.
`
`Defendant infringes, contributes to the infringement of, and/or induces
`
`infringement of the ’724 Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, distributing,
`
`exporting from, and/or importing into the United States products and/or methods covered by one
`
`or more claims of the ’724 Patent including, but not limited to, the Accused Products.
`
`47.
`
`Defendant has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 9 of the ’724
`
`Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, selling, offering for
`
`sale, distributing, exporting from, and/or importing into the United States the Accused Products
`
`without authority and in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`48.
`
`Defendant has and continues to indirectly infringe at least claim 9 of the ’724
`
`Patent by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing others to directly infringe, either
`
`literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, selling, offering for sale,
`
`distributing, exporting from, and/or importing into the United States the Accused Products and
`
`by instructing users of the Accused Products to perform methods claimed in the ’724 Patent. For
`
`example, Defendant, with knowledge that the Accused Products infringe the ’724 Patent at least
`
`as of the date of this Complaint, actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to
`
`knowingly and intentionally induce direct infringement of the ’724 Patent in violation of 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`20
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 21 of 53 PageID #: 21
`
`49.
`
`For example, Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly
`
`infringe at least claim 9 of the ’724 Patent in the United States because Defendant’s customers
`
`use the Accused Products, including at least the Uber, Uber Driver, Uber Eats, Uber Fleet, Uber
`
`Freight, Uber Eats Orders, and Uber Eats Manger Applications, alone or in conjunction with
`
`additional Accused Products (e.g. supporting hardware and software), in accordance with
`
`Defendant’s instructions and thereby directly infringe at least claim 9 of the ’724 Patent in
`
`violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. For example, Uber directly and/or indirectly intentionally instructs
`
`its customers to infringe through training videos, demonstrations, brochures, installations and/or
`
`user guides, such as those located at one or more of the following:
`
`https://www.uber.com/us/en/drive/basics/?city=dallas; https://help.uber.com/riders/section/a-
`
`guide-to-uber?nodeId=5a9e5cd6-88f4-4597-b29a-4feb67d407c2; and Uber agents and
`
`representatives located within this Judicial District. Defendant is thereby also liable for
`
`infringement of the ’724 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`50.
`
`Defendant directly and/or indirectly infringes by practicing a method for
`
`providing a cellular phone communication network for designated participating users, each user
`
`having a similarly equipped cellular phone that includes a CPU, GPS navigational system, an
`
`interact message transmitter and receiver and a touch screen display comprising: accessing a
`
`database in each cell phone that includes a geographical map of a predetermined area for user
`
`viewing on the touch screen display; accessing an application program in each cell phone for
`
`generating one or more symbols representative of one or more participating users, each of whom
`
`have a similarly equipped cellular phone; accessing a database in each cell phone that includes
`
`cellular telephone numbers of each of the participating users having similarly equipped cellular
`
`phones, said database including the generation of one or more symbols associated with a
`
`21
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 22 of 53 PageID #: 22
`
`particular participating user; calling a participating user by touching the symbol on the map
`
`display and touching a call switch; connecting each of the cell phones to an internet connection;
`
`and exchanging IP addresses using SMS or other digital message format between and among
`
`each of the network participant users so that communications between participants is established
`
`via IP or transmission of a network participant’s IP address to a server which then transmits data
`
`to other network participants using the IP address previously.
`
`51.
`
`For example, the Uber Application runs on smart phones which include
`
`navigation systems and provides a touch screen interface with a geographic map that allows
`
`users (e.g. riders) to call other users (e.g. drivers) by touching a symbol on the map display, as
`
`depicted below. For example, the Uber and/or Uber Driver Applications connect cell phones to
`
`an internet connection and exchange IP addresses during a call.
`
`22
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 23 of 53 PageID #: 23
`
`25
`
`52.
`
`For example, the Uber, Uber Driver, and Uber Eats Applications run smart
`
`phones which include voice communication, free and operator selected text messages,
`
`photograph and video, a CPU, a GPS navigation system, and a touch screen display.
`
`53.
`
`For example, the Uber, Uber Driver, and Uber Eats Applications enable
`
`generating one or more symbols on a touch screen display, such as vehicle symbols
`
`
`25 https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fhow-
`to-contact-uber-
`driver&psig=AOvVaw2XA6rxfnh1RqVOK3xxmPim&ust=1611433798461000&source=images
`&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCNCd2eywsO4CFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD
`
`23
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-00026-JRG Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 24 of 53 PageID #: 24
`
`corresponding with the location of a