Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 8947
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§§§
`
`§§§§
`
` Case No.: 2:19-cv-00237-J RG-RSP
`§ Case No.: 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP
`§ Case No.: 2:19-cv-00311-JRG-RSP
`
` JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`GREE, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SUPERCELL OY,
`
`Defendant.
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you
`
`are to follow all the instructions I have given you in the Court s Final Jury
`
`Instructions. Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final
`
`Juiy Instructions. You should refer to and consider the Final Jury Instructions as you
`
`answer the questions in this Verdict Form.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 8948
`
`As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
`
`• GREE or Plaintiff refers to GREE, Inc.
`
`• “Supercell or “Defendant refers to Supercell Oy
`
`• The “ 346 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,328,346
`
`• The “’689 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,335,689
`
`• The “’708 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,076,708
`
`• The “’832 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,413,832
`
`• The “’107 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 9,079,107
`
`• The “’439 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 9,561,439
`
`• The “Asserted Claims refers collectively to Claim 3 of the ’346 Patent; Claim
`
`8 of the ’689 Patent; Claim 1 of the ’708 Patent; Claims 2 and 3 of the
`
`’832 Patent; Claims 1 and 6 of the ’107 Patent; and Claims 1 and 5 of the ’439
`
`Patent.
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 8949
`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 3 of 10 PagelD#: 8949
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`
`-3 -
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 8950
`
`QUESTION 1 - INFRINGEMENT
`
`Did GREE prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Supercell infringed ANY
`
`of the Asserted Claims?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`-4-
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 8951
`
`You MUST answer Question 2A REGARDLESS of your answer to Question
`No. 1. If your answer to Question No. 1 was YES or if it was NO, ou must still
`answer Question No. 2A,
`
`QUESTION 2A - VALIDITY OF THE 346 and 689 PATENTS
`
`Did Supercell prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following
`
`Asserted Claims are invalid?
`
`Answer Yes or No for each Asserted Claim listed below:
`
`346 Patent
`
`Claim 3: Yes: No:
`
`’689 Patent
`
`Claim 8: Yes: No:
`
`-5-
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 8952
`
`Answer Question No. 2B ONLY if you answered YES to Question No. 1. If you
`answered NO to Question No. 1, then DO NOT answer Question No. 2B.
`
`QUESTION 2B - VALIDITY OF THE 107 and 439 PATENTS
`
`Did Supercell prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following
`
`Asserted Claims are invalid?
`
`Answer Yes or “No for each Asserted Claim listed below:
`
`107 Patent
`
`Claim 1: Yes:
`
`Claim 6: Yes:
`
`439 Patent
`
`Claim 1: Yes:
`
`Claim 5: Yes:
`
`-6-
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 8953
`
`If you answered NO to Question No. 1 then DO NOT answer Question No. 3.
`
`Answer Question No. 3 ONLY as to any sserted Claim that you have found
`BOTH to be INFRINGED and NOT INVALID.
`
`QUESTION NO. 3
`
`Did GREE prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Supercell willfully
`
`infringed ANY of the Asserted Claims that you found were infringed?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`-7-
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 8954
`
`If you answered NO to Question No. 1 then DO NOT answer Question No. 4A
`or 4B.
`
`Answer Question No. 4A and 4B ONLY as to any Asserted Claim that you have
`found BOTH to be INFRINGED and NOT INVALID.
`
`QUESTION NO. 4A:
`
`What sum of money, if any, paid now in cash, has GREE proven by a preponderance
`
`of the evidence would compensate GREE for its damages resulting from any
`
`infringement you have found?
`
`Answer in United States Dollars and Cents, if any:
`
`$
`
`-8-
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 8955
`
`QUESTION NO. 4B:
`
`Is the total amount you awarded in Question No. 4A a lump-sum representing
`
`damages for past and future sales, or is it a running royalty for past sales only?
`
`Check one of the following:
`
`Lump-sum
`
`OR
`
`Runnin Royalty
`
`-9-
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00310-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 05/07/21 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 8956
`
`FINAL PAGE OF JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Form and should review it to ensure it
`
`
`
`accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Jury Foreperson should
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`then sign and date the Verdict Form in the spaces below. Once this is done, notify
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The Jury Foreperson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`should keep the Verdict Form and bring it when the jury is brought back into the
`
`courtroom.
`
`this 7-rh day of May, 2021.
`Signed
`
`Jury Foreperson
`
`- 10 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.