throbber
Case 2:19-cv-00209-JRG Document 307 Filed 04/13/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 17740
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`THE HILLMAN GROUP, INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`KEYME, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NOS. 2:19-CV-00209-JRG
`
`
`
` 2:20-CV-00070-JRG
`
`









`
`
`
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`A jury trial commenced in the above-captioned consolidated cases on April 5, 2021, and
`
`on April 12, 2021, the jury reached and returned its unanimous verdict finding that Defendant
`
`KeyMe, LLC (“KeyMe”) did not infringe any of Claims 70 and 71 of U.S. Patent No. 8,979,446,
`
`Claims 9, 10, and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 9,914,179, Claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 10,400,474, Claims
`
`1, 9, 10, and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 10,577,830, Claims 1, 8, 15, and 17 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`10,628,813, and Claims 1, 5, 6, and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 10,737,336 (collectively, the “Asserted
`
`Claims”); that Claim 15 of U.S. Patent No. 9,914,179, Claims 1, 9, 10, and 12 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`10,577,830, and Claims 1, 5, 6, and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 10,737,336 are invalid; and that Claims
`
`9 and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 9,914,179 and Claim 7 of the U.S. Patent No. 10,400,474 are not
`
`invalid. (Dkt. No. 294).
`
`Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in accordance with the
`
`jury’s unanimous verdict and the entirety of the record, the Court hereby ORDERS and ENTERS
`
`JUDGMENT as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00209-JRG Document 307 Filed 04/13/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17741
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`KeyMe did not infringe any of the Asserted Claims;
`
`Claims 9 and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 9,914,179 are not invalid;
`
`Claim 15 of U.S. Patent No. 9,914,179 is invalid;
`
`Claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 10,400,474 is not invalid;
`
`Claims 1, 9, 10, and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 10,577,830 are invalid;
`
`Claims 1, 5, 6, and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 10,737,336 are invalid;
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), Local Rule CV-54, and
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1920, Defendant KeyMe is the prevailing party in these consolidated
`
`cases and shall recover its costs from Plaintiff The Hillman Group, Inc.; and
`
`8.
`
`All other requests for relief now pending and requested by either party but not
`
`specifically addressed herein are DENIED.
`
`All other requests for relief regarding the above-captioned cases, including but not limited
`
`to Motions pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, shall be filed in the Lead Case, Civil Action
`
`No. 2:19-cv-209-JRG, within 28 days of this Judgment.
`
`The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the above-referenced cases.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of April, 2021.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket