throbber
Case 2:19-cv-00209-JRG Document 137 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3821
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`









`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00209-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THE HILLMAN GROUP, INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`KEYME, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiff The Hillman Group, Inc. (“Hillman”) and Defendant KeyMe,
`
`LLC’s (“KeyMe”) (collectively, the “Parties”) Joint Motion to Amend Joint Claim Construction
`
`& Prehearing Statement and KeyMe’s Motion for Leave to Add a Claim Term for Dispute (the
`
`“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 135.) In the same, the Parties move jointly to amend the Patent Local Rule
`
`4-3 Joint Claim Construction & Prehearing Statement (Dkt. No. 116) (the “Joint Statement”) to
`
`reflect the results of the Parties’ efforts to reduce the number of claim construction disputes before
`
`this Court. Also, in the Motion, KeyMe moves for leave to propose an additional claim term—“a
`
`key duplicating system within said kiosk configured to replicate the tooth pattern of the blade of
`
`said key inserted in said key-receiving entry.” Hillman opposes the addition of this additional claim
`
`term. Having reviewed the Motion and both sides arguments, the Court finds that there is sufficient
`
`good cause therein to warrant the addition of the claim term—“a key duplicating system within
`
`said kiosk configured to replicate the tooth pattern of the blade of said key inserted in said key-
`
`receiving entry.” Thus, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion in its entirety should be and
`
`hereby is GRANTED.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00209-JRG Document 137 Filed 05/05/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3822
`
`
`
`Accordingly, the Parties are hereby granted leave to amend their Joint Statement. Further,
`
`KeyMe is granted leave to propose the additional claim term—“a key duplicating system within
`
`said kiosk configured to replicate the tooth pattern of the blade of said key inserted in said key-
`
`receiving entry.” The Parties shall work together to ensure that Hillman is given adequate time to
`
`propose its construction; however, the Court does not plan to continue or reschedule the Markman
`
`briefing schedule. It is further ORDERED that the Parties are to refile a new revised Joint
`
`Statement to reflect the new term and the Parties’ proposed constructions for the same by or before
`
`ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 5th day of May, 2020.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket