`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`QUEST NETTECH CORPORATION,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00118-JRG
`
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiff Quest Nettech Corporation’s (“Quest”) Agreed Motion for an
`
`extension of time for Quest to file its Oppositions to Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to
`
`Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 19) and Apple’s Motion to
`
`Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 20). (Dkt. No. 22 [hereinafter Agreed Motion
`
`for Extensions of Time].) Having considered the same, the Court is of the opinion that the parties’
`
`Agreed Motion for Extensions of Time should be and hereby is GRANTED.
`
`It is therefore ORDERED that:
`
`• Quest’s deadline to respond to Apple’s Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 19) is EXTENDED until and including July 15,
`
`2019. Apple’s deadline to file a reply in support of the same is EXTENDED up to
`
`and including August 1, 2019; and
`
`• Quest’s deadline to responds to Apple’s Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1440(a) (Dkt. No. 20) is EXTENDED until and including July 19, 2019. Apple’s
`
`deadline to file a reply in support of the same is EXTENDED up to and including
`
`August 9, 2019.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00118-JRG Document 26 Filed 07/03/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 228
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of July, 2019.
`
`