`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-514-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-517-JRG
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`§§
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§§
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`ZTE CORPORATION, ET AL.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
`SUR-SUR-REPLY BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SUR-REPLY (DKT. 52)
`IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION (DKT. 38) TO DISMISS
`PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR IMPROPER VENUE OR,
`IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER VENUE
`
`Before the Court is Defendants, ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE (TX), Inc., Opposed Motion
`
`for Leave to File a Sur-Sur-Reply Brief in Response to Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply (Dkt. 53) in
`
`Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Improper Venue or, in
`
`the Alternative, to Transfer Venue (Dkt. 38), and the Court is of the opinion that the motion,
`
`limited to three pages, should be GRANTED.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that Defendants, ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE (TX), Inc.,
`
`Opposed Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Sur-Reply Brief in Response to Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply
`
`(Dkt. 53) in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Improper
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 54-2 Filed 02/12/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 751
`
`Venue or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue (Dkt. 38), limited to three pages, is hereby
`
`Granted.
`
`
`
`2
`
`